Literature DB >> 15929654

What change detection tells us about the visual representation of shape.

Elias H Cohen1, Elan Barenholtz, Manish Singh, Jacob Feldman.   

Abstract

Many recent findings suggest that human observers are surprisingly "blind" to changes in visual displays, failing to notice when substantial scene elements are added, subtracted, or altered in successive presentations of the scene. But observers are far more sensitive to certain visual changes than others, and we suggest that which types of changes enjoy differential sensitivity can reveal a great deal about the underlying visual representations. In this study, we investigate how the human visual system represents the shape of objects by demonstrating a previously unknown influence on detection of changes in shape: the sign of contour curvature. We show that subjects are substantially more sensitive to changes in concave regions of a shape's contour than to changes in convex regions, even when these changes do not alter the number or location of parts. Further, we show that this effect is modulated by figure-ground assignment, so that changes to the same physical contour are more or less detectable, depending on the contour's perceived figural status, which determines whether the change falls in a concave or convex region. The results demonstrate a heightened sensitivity for changes at concavities that is not reducible to a sensitivity to changes in gross part structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15929654     DOI: 10.1167/5.4.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  8 in total

1.  Principles of contour information: Reply to Lim and Leek (2012).

Authors:  Manish Singh; Jacob Feldman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Concavities count for less in symmetry perception.

Authors:  Johan Hulleman; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

3.  Privileged coding of convex shapes in human object-selective cortex.

Authors:  Johannes Haushofer; Chris I Baker; Margaret S Livingstone; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Processing convexity and concavity along a 2-D contour: figure-ground, structural shape, and attention.

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

5.  Image segmentation driven by elements of form.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Syed M Rizvi; Mary M Conte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Investigating shape representation using sensitivity to part- and axis-based transformations.

Authors:  Kristina Denisova; Jacob Feldman; Xiaotao Su; Manish Singh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Perceiving parts and shapes from concave surfaces.

Authors:  Anthony D Cate; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Shape information mediating basic- and subordinate-level object recognition revealed by analyses of eye movements.

Authors:  Lina I Davitt; Filipe Cristino; Alan C-N Wong; E Charles Leek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.332

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.