Literature DB >> 23188740

Processing convexity and concavity along a 2-D contour: figure-ground, structural shape, and attention.

Marco Bertamini1, Johan Wagemans.   

Abstract

Interest in convexity has a long history in vision science. For smooth contours in an image, it is possible to code regions of positive (convex) and negative (concave) curvature, and this provides useful information about solid shape. We review a large body of evidence on the role of this information in perception of shape and in attention. This includes evidence from behavioral, neurophysiological, imaging, and developmental studies. A review is necessary to analyze the evidence on how convexity affects (1) separation between figure and ground, (2) part structure, and (3) attention allocation. Despite some broad agreement on the importance of convexity in these areas, there is a lack of consensus on the interpretation of specific claims--for example, on the contribution of convexity to metric depth and on the automatic directing of attention to convexities or to concavities. The focus is on convexity and concavity along a 2-D contour, not convexity and concavity in 3-D, but the important link between the two is discussed. We conclude that there is good evidence for the role of convexity information in figure-ground organization and in parsing, but other, more specific claims are not (yet) well supported.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23188740     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0347-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  101 in total

1.  Attention-dependent brief adaptation to contour orientation: a high-level aftereffect for convexity?

Authors:  S Suzuki
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visual comparisons within and between object parts: evidence for a single-part superiority effect.

Authors:  Elan Barenholtz; Jacob Feldman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Ordinal configural cues combine with metric disparity in depth perception.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Mary A Peterson; Stephen E Palmer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Parts, cavities, and object representation in infancy.

Authors:  Angela Hayden; Ramesh S Bhatt; Ashley Kangas; Nicole Zieber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The concavity effect is a compound of local and global effects.

Authors:  Joachim Vandekerckhove; Sven Panis; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-10

6.  The "side" matters: how configurality is reflected in completion.

Authors:  Naoki Kogo; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.065

7.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Parts of recognition.

Authors:  D D Hoffman; W A Richards
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1984-12

9.  Attentional selection and the representation of holes and objects.

Authors:  Alice R Albrecht; Alexandra List; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Infants' perception of information along object boundaries: concavities versus convexities.

Authors:  Ramesh S Bhatt; Angela Hayden; Andrea Reed; Evelin Bertin; Jane Joseph
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2006-03-03
View more
  12 in total

1.  Image segmentation driven by elements of form.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Syed M Rizvi; Mary M Conte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Spatially-global integration of closed, fragmented contours by finding the shortest-path in a log-polar representation.

Authors:  TaeKyu Kwon; Kunal Agrawal; Yunfeng Li; Zygmunt Pizlo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Multivariate Patterns in the Human Object-Processing Pathway Reveal a Shift from Retinotopic to Shape Curvature Representations in Lateral Occipital Areas, LO-1 and LO-2.

Authors:  Richard J W Vernon; André D Gouws; Samuel J D Lawrence; Alex R Wade; Antony B Morland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Perceptual influence of elementary three-dimensional geometry: (1) objectness.

Authors:  Florentin Wörgötter; Rahel M Sutterlütti; Minija Tamosiunaite
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-28

5.  Blindness to Curvature and Blindness to Illusory Curvature.

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Akiyoshi Kitaoka
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-05-24

6.  Shape representation modulating the effect of motion on visual search performance.

Authors:  Lindong Yang; Ruifeng Yu; Xuelian Lin; Na Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Perceptual influence of elementary three-dimensional geometry: (2) fundamental object parts.

Authors:  Minija Tamosiunaite; Rahel M Sutterlütti; Simon C Stein; Florentin Wörgötter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-24

8.  The lemon illusion: seeing curvature where there is none.

Authors:  Lars Strother; Kyle W Killebrew; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Shape recognition: convexities, concavities and things in between.

Authors:  Gunnar Schmidtmann; Ben J Jennings; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Faces in commonly experienced configurations enter awareness faster due to their curvature relative to fixation.

Authors:  Pieter Moors; Johan Wagemans; Lee de-Wit
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.