OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the biomechanical interactions among restorative materials, cuspal preparation designs, and cement thickness in a cusp-replacing adhesive premolar restoration. METHODS: Twenty-seven, 3D finite element (FE) models designed in a typical MODL restoration with three restorative materials (CAD/CAM ceramic block, indirect resin composite and glass-ceramic), three cavity preparation designs (buccal cuspal reduction of 1.0mm, 1.5mm and 2.0mm in cuspal height) and three cement thicknesses (50 microm, 100 microm and 150 microm) were constructed to perform the simulations. The ANOVA test was performed to determine the relative importance of the investigated factors and main effects for each of the three investigated factor levels (restorative material, preparation design and cement thickness) in terms of the principal stress values. RESULTS: The results indicated that the stress value in the restorative material was influenced primarily by the restorative material itself (95.49%). Preparation design was found as the major factor (>80%) affecting the stress values in the remaining tooth and luting cement. CONCLUSIONS: Using a low modulus restorative material presented more favorable biomechanical performance and the cuspal height might be at least 1.5mm to critically reduce the stress values when cuspal-coverage treatment is considered. The investigated cement thickness only slightly affected the mechanical behavior of the cuspal replacement restoration.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the biomechanical interactions among restorative materials, cuspal preparation designs, and cement thickness in a cusp-replacing adhesive premolar restoration. METHODS: Twenty-seven, 3D finite element (FE) models designed in a typical MODL restoration with three restorative materials (CAD/CAM ceramic block, indirect resin composite and glass-ceramic), three cavity preparation designs (buccal cuspal reduction of 1.0mm, 1.5mm and 2.0mm in cuspal height) and three cement thicknesses (50 microm, 100 microm and 150 microm) were constructed to perform the simulations. The ANOVA test was performed to determine the relative importance of the investigated factors and main effects for each of the three investigated factor levels (restorative material, preparation design and cement thickness) in terms of the principal stress values. RESULTS: The results indicated that the stress value in the restorative material was influenced primarily by the restorative material itself (95.49%). Preparation design was found as the major factor (>80%) affecting the stress values in the remaining tooth and luting cement. CONCLUSIONS: Using a low modulus restorative material presented more favorable biomechanical performance and the cuspal height might be at least 1.5mm to critically reduce the stress values when cuspal-coverage treatment is considered. The investigated cement thickness only slightly affected the mechanical behavior of the cuspal replacement restoration.
Authors: Bogna Stawarczyk; Andreas Ender; Albert Trottmann; Mutlu Özcan; Jens Fischer; Christoph H F Hämmerle Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli; Sérgio Kiyoshi Ishikiriama; Otávio de Oliveira Filho; José Mondelli Journal: J Appl Oral Sci Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.698