Literature DB >> 19466244

Fracture resistance of weakened teeth restored with condensable resin with and without cusp coverage.

Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli1, Sérgio Kiyoshi Ishikiriama, Otávio de Oliveira Filho, José Mondelli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study evaluated the fracture resistance of weakened human premolars (MOD cavity preparation and pulp chamber roof removal) restored with condensable resin composite with and without cusp coverage.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty human maxillary premolars were divided into three groups: Group A (control), sound teeth; Group B, wide MOD cavities prepared and the pulp chamber roof removed and restored with resin composite without cusp coverage; Group C, same as Group B with 2.0 mm of buccal and palatal cusps reduced and restored with the same resin. The teeth were included in metal rings with self-curing acrylic resin, stored in water for 24 h and thereafter subjected to a compressive axial load in a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min.
RESULTS: The mean fracture resistance values +/- standard deviation (kgf) were: group A: 151.40 +/- 55.32, group B: 60.54 +/- 12.61, group C: 141.90 +/- 30.82. Statistically significant differences were found only between Group B and the other groups (p<0.05). The condensable resin restoration of weakened human premolars with cusp coverage significantly increased the fracture resistance of the teeth as compared to teeth restored without cusp coverage.
CONCLUSION: The results showed that cusp coverage with condensable resin might be a safe option for restoring weakened endodontically treated teeth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19466244      PMCID: PMC4399525          DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000300006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci        ISSN: 1678-7757            Impact factor:   2.698


  30 in total

1.  Fracture strength of weakened human premolars restored with amalgam with and without cusp coverage.

Authors:  R F Mondelli; W F Barbosa; J Mondelli; E B Franco; R M Carvalho
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.522

2.  Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle?

Authors:  C M Sedgley; H H Messer
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.171

3.  Can internal stresses explain the fracture resistance of cusp-replacing composite restorations?

Authors:  W M M Fennis; R H Kuijs; M Barink; C M Kreulen; N Verdonschot; N H J Creugers
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.612

4.  Remaining tooth structure associated with various preparation designs for the endodontically treated maxillary second premolar.

Authors:  Liang Lin Seow; Chooi Gait Toh; Nairn H E Wilson
Journal:  Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent       Date:  2005-06

5.  Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test.

Authors:  Linda Wang; Fernanda Cristina Pimentel Garcia; Paulo Amarante de Araújo; Eduardo Batista Franco; Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.843

6.  Effect of restorative materials on cuspal flexure.

Authors:  J Medige; Y Deng; X Yu; E L Davis; R B Joynt
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.677

7.  An in vivo study of cuspal fracture.

Authors:  W T Cavel; W P Kelsey; R J Blankenau
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Management of the endodontically treated tooth. Part I: concept for restorative designs.

Authors:  A C Goerig; L A Mueninghoff
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  Coronal fractures in posterior teeth.

Authors:  P Lagouvardos; P Sourai; G Douvitsas
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.440

10.  Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.

Authors:  Paulo Vinicius Soares; Paulo Cesar Freitas Santos-Filho; Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins; Carlos Jose Soares
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.426

View more
  12 in total

1.  The effect of the post length and cusp coverage on the cycling and static load of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.

Authors:  Nicola Scotti; Marco Scansetti; Riccardo Rota; Francesco Pera; Damiano Pasqualini; Elio Berutti
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with cervical defects using different restorative treatments.

Authors:  Yi-Bai Guo; Wei Bai; Yu-Hong Liang
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.719

3.  Fracture Resistance of Endodontically-treated Maxillary Premolars Restored with Composite Resin along with Glass Fiber Insertion in Different Positions.

Authors:  Elmira Jafari Navimipour; Mohammad Esmaeel Ebrahimi Chaharom; Parnian Alizadeh Oskoee; Narmin Mohammadi; Mahmoud Bahari; Maryam Firouzmandi
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2012-11-12

4.  Influence of cavity design preparation on stress values in maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ivana Kantardzić; Darko Vasiljević; Larisa Blazić; Ognjan Luzanin
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.351

5.  Reinforcement of unsupported enamel by restorative materials and dentin bonding agents: an in vitro study.

Authors:  M Mirzaei; M Ghavam; T Rostamzadeh
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2010-06-30

6.  How can stress be controlled in endodontically treated teeth? A 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ihsan Yıkılgan; Oya Bala
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-07-15

7.  Effects of resin luting agents and 1% NaOCl on the marginal fit of indirect composite restorations in primary teeth.

Authors:  Ana Flávia Sanches Borges; Luciana Estevam Simonato; Fernanda Miori Pascon; Kamila Rosamiglia Kantowitz; Regina Maria Puppin Rontani
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with different direct corono-radicular restoration methods.

Authors:  Horieh Moosavi; Safora Afshari; Fatemeh Manari
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-03-01

9.  Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored by Various Direct Filling Materials: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Jozef Mincik; Daniel Urban; Silvia Timkova; Renata Urban
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2016-08-30

10.  Effect of cusp coverage and water storage on compressive strength of composite restorations of premolars.

Authors:  Shila Emamieh; Parvaneh Hojati; Amir Ghasemi; Hasan Torabzadeh
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.