Literature DB >> 20830497

The effect of the post length and cusp coverage on the cycling and static load of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.

Nicola Scotti1, Marco Scansetti, Riccardo Rota, Francesco Pera, Damiano Pasqualini, Elio Berutti.   

Abstract

In endodontically treated teeth, cuspal coverage plays a fundamental role in reducing the risk of fracture. However, the adhesive techniques with or without fiber post increased the possibilities in restoring root-filled teeth. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the fiber post and/or post length and/or cuspal coverage on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Seventy intact single-rooted maxillary premolars were selected and divided in seven groups of ten each: "intact teeth" (control), "inlay without fiber post" (G1), "inlay with long fiber post" (G2), "inlay with short fiber post" (G3), "onlay without fiber post" (G4), "onlay with long fiber post" (G5), and "onlay with short fiber post" (G6). Except for intact teeth, all specimens were prepared with a mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavity, endodontically treated and restored with or without long or short post, with or without cusp coverage. All specimens were thermal-cycled, exposed to a cyclic loading, and then submitted to the static fracture resistance test. Fracture loads and mode of failure were evaluated. A statistically significant difference in fracture resistance was found between group 1 and the other groups (p < 0.001). χ2 test showed statistically significant differences in the patterns of fractures between the groups (p < 0.001). The highest number of favorable fractures was observed in groups 3 and 4. Similar fracture resistance was detected in maxillary premolars endodontically treated with MOD cavity preparations, restored with either direct resin composite with fiber post or cusp capping. The "short post" direct restoration may be a valid alternative in the restoration of root-filled premolars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20830497     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0466-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  54 in total

1.  Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions.

Authors:  R E Kovarik; L C Breeding; W F Caughman
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Influence of endodontic treatment, post insertion, and ceramic restoration on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.

Authors:  K Bitter; H Meyer-Lueckel; N Fotiadis; U Blunck; K Neumann; A M Kielbassa; S Paris
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.264

3.  Can fiber posts increase root stresses and reduce fracture?

Authors:  A F V Santos; J B C Meira; C B Tanaka; T A Xavier; R Y Ballester; R G Lima; C S Pfeifer; A Versluis
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Mechanical interactions of cuspal-coverage designs and cement thickness in a cusp-replacing ceramic premolar restoration: a finite element study.

Authors:  Yen-Hsiang Chang; Wen-Hsueng Lin; Wen-Chieh Kuo; Chia-Yu Chang; Chun-Li Lin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  D Assif; C Gorfil
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.

Authors:  S H Siso; F Hürmüzlü; M Turgut; E Altundaşar; A Serper; K Er
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.264

7.  Clinical evaluation of the use of fiber posts and direct resin restorations for endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  Simone Grandini; Cecilia Goracci; Franklin R Tay; Romano Grandini; Marco Ferrari
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  Influence of light-curing protocols on polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage force of a dual-cured core build-up resin composite.

Authors:  Tobias T Tauböck; Tissiana Bortolotto; Wolfgang Buchalla; Thomas Attin; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.612

9.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts.

Authors:  Marcela P Newman; Peter Yaman; Joseph Dennison; Mary Rafter; Edward Billy
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.

Authors:  Paulo Vinicius Soares; Paulo Cesar Freitas Santos-Filho; Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins; Carlos Jose Soares
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.426

View more
  10 in total

1.  Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength.

Authors:  Anaïs Ramírez-Sebastià; Tissiana Bortolotto; Maria Cattani-Lorente; Lluis Giner; Miguel Roig; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  External gap progression after cyclic fatigue of adhesive overlays and crowns made with high translucency zirconia or lithium silicate.

Authors:  Andrea Baldi; Allegra Comba; Giorgio Ferrero; Edoardo Italia; Riccardo Michelotto Tempesta; Gaetano Paolone; Annalisa Mazzoni; Lorenzo Breschi; Nicola Scotti
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.040

3.  How can stress be controlled in endodontically treated teeth? A 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ihsan Yıkılgan; Oya Bala
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-07-15

4.  Fracture resistance and marginal gap formation of post-core restorations: influence of different fiber-reinforced composites.

Authors:  Márk Fráter; Lippo Lassila; Gábor Braunitzer; Pekka K Vallittu; Sufyan Garoushi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Could different direct restoration techniques affect interfacial gap and fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth?

Authors:  Allegra Comba; Andrea Baldi; Carlo Massimo Saratti; Giovanni Tommaso Rocca; Carlos Rocha Gomes Torres; Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira; Felipe Luiz Valandro; Nicola Scotti
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Patterns of Post-Endodontic Restoration: A Nationwide Survey of Dentists in Turkey.

Authors:  Sıla Nur Usta; Begüm Cömert-Pak; Eda Karaismailoğlu; Ayhan Eymirli; Derya Deniz-Sungur
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Fatigue performance of endodontically treated premolars restored with direct and indirect cuspal coverage restorations utilizing fiber-reinforced cores.

Authors:  Márk Fráter; Tekla Sáry; Janka Molnár; Gábor Braunitzer; Lippo Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu; Sufyan Garoushi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 8.  Mechanical Performance of Direct Restorative Techniques Utilizing Long Fibers for "Horizontal Splinting" to Reinforce Deep MOD Cavities-An Updated Literature Review.

Authors:  András Jakab; András Volom; Tekla Sáry; Eszter Vincze-Bandi; Gábor Braunitzer; David Alleman; Sufyan Garoushi; Márk Fráter
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.329

9.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer.

Authors:  Fereshteh Shafiei; Maryam Sadat Tavangar; Yasamin Ghahramani; Zahra Fattah
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Effect of Load Cycling on the Fracture Strength/Mode of Teeth Restored with FRC Posts or a FRC Liner and a Resin Composite.

Authors:  Maria D Gaintantzopoulou; Eleftherios T Farmakis; George C Eliades
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.