Literature DB >> 18218519

Parameter estimation and tissue segmentation from multispectral MR images.

Z Liang1, J R Macfall, D P Harrington.   

Abstract

A statistical method is developed to classify tissue types and to segment the corresponding tissue regions from relaxation time T(1 ), T(2), and proton density P(D) weighted magnetic resonance images. The method assumes that the distribution of image intensities associated with each tissue type can be expressed as a multivariate likelihood function of three weighted signal intensity values (T(1), T(2), P(D)) at each location within that tissue regions. The method further assumes that the underlying tissue regions are piecewise contiguous and can be characterized by a Markov random field prior. In classifying the tissue types, the method models the likelihood of realizing the images as a finite multivariate-mixture function. The class parameters associated with the tissue types (i.e. the weighted intensity means, variances and correlation coefficients of the multivariate function, as well as the number of voxels within regions of the tissue types of are estimated by maximum likelihood. The estimation fits the class parameters to the image data via the expectation-maximization algorithm. The number of classes associated with the tissue types is determined by the information criterion of minimum description length. The method segments the tissue regions, given the estimated class parameters, by maximum a posteriori probability. The prior is constructed by the tissue-region membership of the first- and second-order neighborhood. The method is tested by a few sets of T(1), T(2), and P(D) weighted images of the brain acquired with a 1.5 Tesla whole body scanner. The number of classes and the associated class parameters are automatically estimated. The regions of different brain tissues are satisfactorily segmented.

Year:  1994        PMID: 18218519     DOI: 10.1109/42.310875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  10 in total

1.  Quantitative MRI assessment of leukoencephalopathy.

Authors:  Wilburn E Reddick; John O Glass; James W Langston; Kathleen J Helton
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Virtual colonoscopy vs optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Zhengrong Liang; Robert Richards
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2010-03-01

3.  Semi-automatic segmentation for 3D motion analysis of the tongue with dynamic MRI.

Authors:  Junghoon Lee; Jonghye Woo; Fangxu Xing; Emi Z Murano; Maureen Stone; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Partial volume segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images based on maximum a posteriori probability.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Lihong Li; Hongbing Lu; Zhengrong Liang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Quantification and Segmentation of Brain Tissues from MR Images: A Probabilistic Neural Network Approach.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Tülay Adalý; Sun-Yuan Kung; Zsolt Szabo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  QUANTITATIVE MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGE ANALYSIS VIA THE EM ALGORITHM WITH STOCHASTIC VARIATION.

Authors:  Xiaoxi Zhang; Timothy D Johnson; Roderick J A Little; Yue Cao
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Simultaneous Estimation of Elasticity for Multiple Deformable Bodies.

Authors:  Shan Yang; Ming Lin
Journal:  Comput Animat Virtual Worlds       Date:  2015 May-Aug       Impact factor: 1.020

8.  Intensity Standardization Simplifies Brain MR Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Ying Zhuge; Jayaram K Udupa
Journal:  Comput Vis Image Underst       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Automated segmentation and shape characterization of volumetric data.

Authors:  Vitaly L Galinsky; Lawrence R Frank
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Automated segmentation tool for brain infusions.

Authors:  Kathryn Hammond Rosenbluth; Francisco Gimenez; Adrian P Kells; Ernesto A Salegio; Gabriele M Mittermeyer; Kevin Modera; Anmol Kohal; Krystof S Bankiewicz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.