Literature DB >> 18215207

Optimal two-stage design for case-control association analysis incorporating genotyping errors.

Y Zuo1, G Zou, J Wang, H Zhao, H Liang.   

Abstract

Two-stage design is a cost effective approach for identifying disease genes in genetic studies and it has received much attention recently. In general, there are two types of two-stage designs that differ on the methods and samples used to measure allele frequencies in the first stage: (1) Individual genotyping is used in the first stage; (2) DNA pooling is used in the first stage. In this paper, we focus on the latter. Zuo et al. (2006) investigated statistical power of such a design, among other things, but the cost of the study was not taken into account. The purpose of this paper is to study the optimal design under the given overall cost. We investigate how to allocate the resources to the two stages. Note that in addition to the measurement errors associated with DNA pooling, genotyping errors are also unavoidable with individual genotyping. Therefore, we discuss the optimal design combining genotyping errors associated with individual genotyping. The joint statistical distributions of test statistics in the first and second stages are derived. For a fixed cost, our results show that the optimal design requires no additional samples in the second stage but only that the samples in the first stage be re-used. When the second stage uses an entirely independent sample, however, the optimal design under a given cost depends on the population allele frequency and allele frequency difference between the case and control groups. For the current genotyping costs, we can roughly allocate 1/3 to 1/2 of the total sample size to the first stage for screening.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18215207      PMCID: PMC2836813          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2007.00419.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Genet        ISSN: 0003-4800            Impact factor:   1.670


  36 in total

1.  Power loss for multiallelic transmission/disequilibrium test when errors introduced: GAW11 simulated data.

Authors:  D Gordon; T C Matise; S C Heath; J Ott
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics.

Authors:  Eric Sobel; Jeanette C Papp; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?

Authors:  Sun Jung Kang; Derek Gordon; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Haplotype frequency estimation in the presence of genotyping errors.

Authors:  Guohua Zou; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.444

5.  Detection of genotyping errors by Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium testing.

Authors:  Louise Hosking; Sheena Lumsden; Karen Lewis; Astrid Yeo; Linda McCarthy; Aruna Bansal; John Riley; Ian Purvis; Chun-Fang Xu
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Optimal two-stage genotyping designs for genome-wide association scans.

Authors:  Hansong Wang; Duncan C Thomas; Itsik Pe'er; Daniel O Stram
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 7.  Factors affecting statistical power in the detection of genetic association.

Authors:  Derek Gordon; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 8.  The relative power of family-based and case-control designs for linkage disequilibrium studies of complex human diseases I. DNA pooling.

Authors:  N Risch; J Teng
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 9.  Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium.

Authors:  N J Risch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Two-stage designs for gene-disease association studies with sample size constraints.

Authors:  Jaya M Satagopan; E S Venkatraman; Colin B Begg
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  9 in total

1.  Incorporating duplicate genotype data into linear trend tests of genetic association: methods and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Bryce Borchers; Marshall Brown; Brian McLellan; Airat Bekmetjev; Nathan L Tintle
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-05-05

2.  Optimal 2-stage design with given power in association studies.

Authors:  Jiexun Wang; Hua Liang; Guohua Zou
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  The efficacy of detecting variants with small effects on the Affymetrix 6.0 platform using pooled DNA.

Authors:  Charleston W K Chiang; Zofia K Z Gajdos; Joshua M Korn; Johannah L Butler; Rachel Hackett; Candace Guiducci; Thutrang T Nguyen; Rainford Wilks; Terrence Forrester; Katherine D Henderson; Loic Le Marchand; Brian E Henderson; Christopher A Haiman; Richard S Cooper; Helen N Lyon; Xiaofeng Zhu; Colin A McKenzie; Mark R Palmert; Joel N Hirschhorn
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Interleukin-1β gene variants are associated with QTc interval prolongation following cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Miklos D Kertai; Yunqi Ji; Yi-Ju Li; Joseph P Mathew; James P Daubert; Mihai V Podgoreanu
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Design of association studies with pooled or un-pooled next-generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Su Yeon Kim; Yingrui Li; Yiran Guo; Ruiqiang Li; Johan Holmkvist; Torben Hansen; Oluf Pedersen; Jun Wang; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  The cost effectiveness of duplicate genotyping for testing genetic association.

Authors:  Nathan Tintle; Derek Gordon; Dirk Van Bruggen; Stephen Finch
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 1.670

7.  Identifying Potential Regions of Copy Number Variation for Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Yi-Hsuan Chen; Ru-Band Lu; Hung Hung; Po-Hsiu Kuo
Journal:  Microarrays (Basel)       Date:  2014-02-28

8.  Emilin1 gene and essential hypertension: a two-stage association study in northern Han Chinese population.

Authors:  Chong Shen; Xiangfeng Lu; Yun Li; Qi Zhao; Xiaoli Liu; Liping Hou; Laiyuan Wang; Shufeng Chen; Jianfeng Huang; Dongfeng Gu
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.103

9.  Impact of genotypic errors with equal and unequal family contribution on accuracy of genomic prediction in aquaculture using simulation.

Authors:  N Khalilisamani; P C Thomson; H W Raadsma; M S Khatkar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.