Literature DB >> 18214451

Auditory contact cues improve performance when grasping augmented and virtual objects with a tool.

Mihaela A Zahariev1, Christine L Mackenzie.   

Abstract

This experiment investigated the roles of haptic and auditory contact information for the control and execution of reaching to grasp augmented (physical plus graphic) and virtual (graphic only) objects of different sizes using a tool. Haptic contact information was present when grasping augmented objects only. In half of the trials, auditory cues were provided when contact was made between the tip of the tool and the target object. Transport and grasp kinematics, as well as on spatial errors at the end of the movement were examined. Providing auditory cues at contact led to faster movements; moreover, when haptic information was not available (when grasping virtual objects), auditory cues improved spatial accuracy. Movement times increased as the object size decreased for the augmented objects, when haptic information was available, and also for the virtual objects when auditory contact cues were provided, thus following Fitts' law. However, movement times were similar for all object sizes when neither haptic nor auditory contact information was provided. These results emphasize the importance of contact information when grasping with a tool, and the benefits of auditory contact cues for improving performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18214451     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1269-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  9 in total

1.  Sensitivity of laparoscopic dissectors. What can you feel?

Authors:  K T den Boer; J L Herder; W Sjoerdsma; D W Meijer; D J Gouma; H G Stassen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The timing of natural prehension movements.

Authors:  M Jeannerod
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Grasping an object naturally or with a tool: are these tasks guided by a common motor representation?

Authors:  Maurizio Gentilucci; Alice C Roy; Silvia Stefanini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The influence of visual target and limb information on manual aiming.

Authors:  D Elliott
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1988-03

5.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; M Jeannerod; S Athenes; C Dugas
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-09

6.  Auditory texture perception.

Authors:  S J Lederman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target. II. Static and dynamic visual cues in the control of hand movement.

Authors:  C Prablanc; J E Echallier; M Jeannerod; E Komilis
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  The role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements: a kinematic study in a peripherally deafferented patient and in normal subjects.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; I Toni; S Chieffi; G Pavesi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Grasping at 'thin air': multimodal contact cues for reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Mihaela A Zahariev; Christine L MacKenzie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 2.064

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements in immersive haptic-free virtual reality.

Authors:  Madhur Mangalam; Mathew Yarossi; Mariusz P Furmanek; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of auditory feedback on movements with two-segment sequence and eye-hand coordination.

Authors:  Miya K Rand
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A practical system for recording instrument interactions during live robotic surgery.

Authors:  William McMahan; Ernest D Gomez; Liting Chen; Karlin Bark; John C Nappo; Eza I Koch; David I Lee; Kristoffel R Dumon; Noel N Williams; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-04-05

4.  When ears drive hands: the influence of contact sound on reaching to grasp.

Authors:  Umberto Castiello; Bruno L Giordano; Chiara Begliomini; Caterina Ansuini; Massimo Grassi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.