Literature DB >> 17242914

Grasping at 'thin air': multimodal contact cues for reaching and grasping.

Mihaela A Zahariev1, Christine L MacKenzie.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the effects of haptic, auditory and graphic contact cues on reaching to grasp augmented objects (physical and graphic) and virtual objects (graphic only) of various sizes. In Experiment 1, auditory contact cues were presented either to enhance or to replace natural haptic contact cues in grasping. In Experiment 2, graphic contact cues were presented alone or in combination with auditory cues, and were provided either to enhance or to replace haptic contact information. Visual information of the hand was not available. Experiment 1 showed that enhancing haptic contact information with redundant auditory cues (augmented object) led to faster movement times than haptic cues alone. When haptic information was not available (virtual object), it could be replaced to some extent by auditory contact cues. In Experiment 2 movement times were fastest when both auditory and graphic cues were provided, and slowest when no contact cues were provided. Further, movement times were scaled to target width when reaching to grasp augmented objects, thus following Fitts' law. In contrast, movement times showed a less pronounced decrease with increasing object size for virtual objects. However, even in the absence of haptic information, movement times showed a more pronounced scaling to object size when auditory contact cues were provided. These results emphasize the importance of contact information, especially haptic and auditory information, for planning and control of reaching and grasping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17242914     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0845-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  27 in total

Review 1.  Motor prediction.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; J R Flanagan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-06

Review 3.  Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers; Pierre Baraduc; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The timing of natural prehension movements.

Authors:  M Jeannerod
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  A cross-modal interference effect in grasping objects.

Authors:  Sandhiran Patchay; Umberto Castiello; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

6.  Multisensory integration. Neural and behavioral solutions for dealing with stimuli from different sensory modalities.

Authors:  B E Stein; M A Meredith
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Cognitive salience of haptic object properties: role of modality-encoding bias.

Authors:  S J Lederman; C Summers; R L Klatzky
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Parchment-skin illusion: sound-biased touch.

Authors:  V Jousmäki; R Hari
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-03-12       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Sound alters visual motion perception.

Authors:  R Sekuler; A B Sekuler; R Lau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Auditory texture perception.

Authors:  S J Lederman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  7 in total

1.  Auditory contact cues improve performance when grasping augmented and virtual objects with a tool.

Authors:  Mihaela A Zahariev; Christine L Mackenzie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements in immersive haptic-free virtual reality.

Authors:  Madhur Mangalam; Mathew Yarossi; Mariusz P Furmanek; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of auditory feedback on movements with two-segment sequence and eye-hand coordination.

Authors:  Miya K Rand
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A practical system for recording instrument interactions during live robotic surgery.

Authors:  William McMahan; Ernest D Gomez; Liting Chen; Karlin Bark; John C Nappo; Eza I Koch; David I Lee; Kristoffel R Dumon; Noel N Williams; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-04-05

5.  Exploring the bases for a mixed reality stroke rehabilitation system, part I: a unified approach for representing action, quantitative evaluation, and interactive feedback.

Authors:  Nicole Lehrer; Suneth Attygalle; Steven L Wolf; Thanassis Rikakis
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 6.  Reach-to-Grasp: A Multisensory Experience.

Authors:  Sonia Betti; Umberto Castiello; Chiara Begliomini
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-09

7.  The grasping side of odours.

Authors:  Federico Tubaldi; Caterina Ansuini; Roberto Tirindelli; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.