Literature DB >> 27001874

A practical system for recording instrument interactions during live robotic surgery.

William McMahan1, Ernest D Gomez2, Liting Chen2, Karlin Bark3, John C Nappo3, Eza I Koch3, David I Lee2, Kristoffel R Dumon2, Noel N Williams2, Katherine J Kuchenbecker3.   

Abstract

We have developed a system for measuring and recording the high-frequency vibrations that characterize instrument interactions during minimally invasive robotic surgery. Consisting of simple circuitry and a DVD recorder, this system is low-cost and easily implementable, requires no sterilization, and enables measurement of a validated, objective technical skill metric in both the simulated setting and the operating room. The vibration recordings of fourteen sleeve gastrectomies were processed by segmenting the operation into seven phases and calculating the root mean square (RMS) vibration within each phase. Statistical analysis showed that the observed differences match expectations drawn from knowledge of the operation, substantiating the premise that RMS vibration provides a good measure of the intensity of instrument interactions during live robotic surgery.

Keywords:  Haptics; Instrument interactions; Robotic/instrumentation; Sensors; Technology assessment; Training; Vibrotactile feedback

Year:  2013        PMID: 27001874     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-013-0399-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  19 in total

1.  The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model.

Authors:  V Datta; S Mackay; M Mandalia; A Darzi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills.

Authors:  Alvin C Goh; David W Goldfarb; James C Sander; Brian J Miles; Brian J Dunkin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review.

Authors:  H W R Schreuder; R Wolswijk; R P Zweemer; M P Schijven; R H M Verheijen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Feeling what you hear: auditory signals can modulate tactile tap perception.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Marc O Ernst; Knut Drewing; Guillaume Bouyer; Vincent Maury; Abderrahmane Kheddar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Auditory contact cues improve performance when grasping augmented and virtual objects with a tool.

Authors:  Mihaela A Zahariev; Christine L Mackenzie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The qualities and conduct of an English surgeon in 1446: as described in a manuscript attributed to Thomas Morstede.

Authors:  J J Kirkpatrick; I L Naylor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  In vivo validation of a system for haptic feedback of tool vibrations in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Karlin Bark; William McMahan; Austin Remington; Jamie Gewirtz; Alexei Wedmid; David I Lee; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Tool Contact Acceleration Feedback for Telerobotic Surgery.

Authors:  W McMahan; J Gewirtz; D Standish; P Martin; J A Kunkel; M Lilavois; A Wedmid; D I Lee; K J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.487

9.  Teaching and testing technical skills.

Authors:  R K Reznick
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Grasping at 'thin air': multimodal contact cues for reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Mihaela A Zahariev; Christine L MacKenzie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 2.064

View more
  2 in total

1.  Objective assessment of robotic surgical skill using instrument contact vibrations.

Authors:  Ernest D Gomez; Rajesh Aggarwal; William McMahan; Karlin Bark; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Surgeons and non-surgeons prefer haptic feedback of instrument vibrations during robotic surgery.

Authors:  Jacqueline K Koehn; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.