Literature DB >> 15007584

Grasping an object naturally or with a tool: are these tasks guided by a common motor representation?

Maurizio Gentilucci1, Alice C Roy, Silvia Stefanini.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine whether kinematic parameters of the grasping motor act are controlled independently of the biomechanical features of the grasping effector. With this purpose in mind, we compared grasping movements performed naturally or using a tool. The tool consisted of two mechanical fingers whose opening and closing phases required squeezing (flexion of the biological fingers) and releasing (extension of the biological fingers) of a handle, respectively. The forces required for opening and closing the mechanical fingers were, respectively, greater and smaller than those used to grasp the objects naturally. In a control experiment the participants grasped with their thumb and index finger the same objects grasped with the tool. The kinematics of the mechanical and biological fingers as well as those of the arm in the two experiments were compared with each other. Grasping an object with the tool showed some kinematic characteristics strikingly similar to those of the natural grasp, whereas others were different. Like the natural grasp, the tool grasp consisted of a finger opening and closing phase. The scaling of both peak velocity of aperture and maximal aperture of the mechanical fingers as a function of object size was the same as that of the biological fingers. In contrast, the tool grasp differed from the natural one for the temporal aspects of the movement. Finally, the initial reach (i.e. the acceleration phase) was poorly influenced by the tool use whereas the final reach (i.e. the deceleration phase) was lengthened and more sensitive to object size. We discuss the results of the present study as being in favour of the hypothesis that some features of the grasp motor representation are coded in cortical areas independently of the used effector. In addition, they suggest a partial independence between the reach and the grasp components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15007584     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1863-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

Review 1.  A new view on grasping.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Body-scaled transitions in human grip configurations.

Authors:  P Cesari; K M Newell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Patterns of hand motion during grasping and the influence of sensory guidance.

Authors:  Marco Santello; Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Macaque prefrontal activity associated with extensive tool use.

Authors:  Shigeru Obayashi; Tetsuya Suhara; Yuji Nagai; Jun Maeda; Sayaka Hihara; Atsushi Iriki
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-12-03       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Object familiarity affects finger shaping during grasping of fruit stalks.

Authors:  Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; U Castiello; M L Corradini; M Scarpa; C Umiltà; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Common organization for unimanual and bimanual reach-to-grasp tasks.

Authors:  J R Tresilian; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; R Camarda; L Fogassi; M Gentilucci; G Luppino; M Matelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Finger control in the tripod grasp.

Authors:  Maurizio Gentilucci; Luana Caselli; Claudio Secchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension.

Authors:  M A Goodale; J P Meenan; H H Bülthoff; D A Nicolle; K J Murphy; C I Racicot
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  18 in total

1.  Grab an object with a tool and change your body: tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action.

Authors:  Lucilla Cardinali; Stéphane Jacobs; Claudio Brozzoli; Francesca Frassinetti; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic study.

Authors:  Alexandra Grosskopf; Johann P Kuhtz-Buschbeck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Collision judgment of objects approaching the head.

Authors:  E Poljac; B Neggers; A V van den Berg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Auditory contact cues improve performance when grasping augmented and virtual objects with a tool.

Authors:  Mihaela A Zahariev; Christine L Mackenzie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hand-use and tool-use in grasping control.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Itaguchi; Kazuyoshi Fukuzawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Decoding the neural mechanisms of human tool use.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; D Adam McLean; Kenneth F Valyear; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Online kinematic regulation by visual feedback for grasp versus transport during reach-to-pinch.

Authors:  Raviraj Nataraj; Cristian Pasluosta; Zong-Ming Li
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 8.  Tool use and the distalization of the end-effector.

Authors:  Michael A Arbib; James B Bonaiuto; Stéphane Jacobs; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-04-04

9.  Coordination deficits during trunk-assisted reach-to-grasp movements in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Arend W A Van Gemmert; Abul B M I Hossain; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The heavier the arm, the higher the action: the effects of forearm-weight changes on reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Luna Ando; Yoshihiro Itaguchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.