Literature DB >> 1820250

A proposed method for assembly and interpretation of short-term test data.

D Brusick1.   

Abstract

The genetic toxicology databases for chemicals that have been tested extensively are generally composed of inconsistent responses from a diverse set of assays. Consequently, difficulties arise when the data are evaluated for classifying the agent or for assessing the chemical's hazard potential. Several years ago, the International Commission for Protection against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens (ICPEMC) established a committee to construct a process for compiling and interpreting diverse data sets. The Committee has developed a weight-of-evidence approach that combines test data into a series of scores for test type, class, family, and a consensus score defining the relative mutagenic activity of the agent compared with other chemicals in the database. This report describes the method and preliminary results from 113 chemicals.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1820250      PMCID: PMC1568242          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9196101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  10 in total

1.  Use of computerized data listings and activity profiles of genetic and related effects in the review of 195 compounds.

Authors:  M D Waters; H F Stack; A L Brady; P H Lohman; L Haroun; H Vainio
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988 May-Aug       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  Predicting carcinogenicity with short-term tests: biological models and operational approaches.

Authors:  R Benigni; A Giuliani
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988 May-Aug       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  The carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection (CPBS) method: a Bayesian approach.

Authors:  V Chankong; Y Y Haimes; H S Rosenkranz; J Pet-Edwards
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. ICPEMC Working Paper 1/2. A multi-factor ranking scheme for comparing the carcinogenic activity of chemicals.

Authors:  S Nesnow
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Procarbazine-induced specific-locus mutations in male mice.

Authors:  U H Ehling; A Neuhäuser
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 6.  Quantification of the genetic risk of environmental mutagens.

Authors:  U H Ehling
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 7.  Mutagenic and carcinogenic potency indices and their correlation.

Authors:  S Parodi; M Taningher; P Romano; S Grilli; L Santi
Journal:  Teratog Carcinog Mutagen       Date:  1990

8.  Ranking animal carcinogens: a proposed regulatory approach.

Authors:  R A Squire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  The mouse specific-locus test with agents other than radiations: interpretation of data and recommendations for future work.

Authors:  L B Russell; P B Selby; E von Halle; W Sheridan; L Valcovic
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays.

Authors:  L S Gold; C B Sawyer; R Magaw; G M Backman; M de Veciana; R Levinson; N K Hooper; W R Havender; L Bernstein; R Peto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  The Genetic Activity Profile database.

Authors:  M D Waters; H F Stack; N E Garrett; M A Jackson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.