Literature DB >> 3990699

The carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection (CPBS) method: a Bayesian approach.

V Chankong, Y Y Haimes, H S Rosenkranz, J Pet-Edwards.   

Abstract

Recently, a large number of relatively inexpensive in vitro short-term tests have been developed to help predict the carcinogenicity of chemicals. The carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection (CPBS) method utilizes the results of such short-term tests to screen for chemicals that are most likely to cause cancer. The method is an integrated approach for analyzing large, often sparsely filled, data bases containing short-term test results, which often have only marginal representation of known non-carcinogens. The CPBS method is developed for the purpose of (i) determining the reliability and predictive capability of individual and batteries of short-term tests, and (ii) developing a strategy for formulating and selecting optimally preferred batteries of short-term tests for screening chemicals for further testing. The term 'optimally preferred' connotes the best acceptable combination of tests in terms of trade-offs among the multiple attributes of each test and resulting battery (e.g., cost, sensitivity, specificity, etc). The CPBS method consists of 5 major tasks: (1) data consolidation, (2) parameter estimation, (3) predictivity calculation, (4) battery selection and (5) risk assessment. Although there is a great need for more research and improvement, the CPBS method at its present stage should add an important method to the maze of the thousands of new chemicals that are introduced into drugs, foods, consumer goods and to the environment every year. This method should also provide an enhanced identification procedure for classifying chemicals more accurately as suspected carcinogens or non-carcinogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3990699     DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(85)90011-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  5 in total

Review 1.  Invited contribution: an objective approach to the development of short-term tests predictive of carcinogenicity.

Authors:  H S Rosenkranz; F K Ennever; V Chankong; J Pet-Edwards; Y Y Haimes
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 6.691

2.  Integrated in silico approaches for the prediction of Ames test mutagenicity.

Authors:  Sandeep Modi; Jin Li; Sophie Malcomber; Claire Moore; Andrew Scott; Andrew White; Paul Carmichael
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Prediction of the carcinogenicity of a second group of organic chemicals undergoing carcinogenicity testing.

Authors:  Y P Zhang; N Sussman; O T Macina; H S Rosenkranz; G Klopman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  A proposed method for assembly and interpretation of short-term test data.

Authors:  D Brusick
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Predicting carcinogenicity by using batteries of dependent short-term tests.

Authors:  B S Kim; B H Margolin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.