Literature DB >> 18198150

Multimodal signals enhance decision making in foraging bumble-bees.

Ipek G Kulahci1, Anna Dornhaus, Daniel R Papaj.   

Abstract

Multimodal signals are common in nature and have recently attracted considerable attention. Despite this interest, their function is not well understood. We test the hypothesis that multimodal signals improve decision making in receivers by influencing the speed and the accuracy of their decisions. We trained bumble-bees (Bombus impatiens) to discriminate between artificial flowers that differed either in one modality, visual (specifically, shape) or olfactory, or in two modalities, visual plus olfactory. Bees trained on multimodal flowers learned the rewarding flowers faster than those trained on flowers that differed only in the visual modality and, in extinction trials, visited the previously rewarded flowers at a higher rate than bees trained on unimodal flowers. Overall, bees showed a speed-accuracy trade-off; bees that made slower decisions achieved higher accuracy levels. Foraging on multimodal flowers did not affect the slope of the speed-accuracy relationship, but resulted in a higher intercept, indicating that multimodal signals were associated with consistently higher accuracy across range of decision speeds. Our results suggest that bees make more effective decisions when flowers signal in more than one modality, and confirm the importance of studying signal components together rather than separately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18198150      PMCID: PMC2596894          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  22 in total

1.  Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Psychophysics: bees trade off foraging speed for accuracy.

Authors:  Lars Chittka; Adrian G Dyer; Fiola Bock; Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision.

Authors:  John Palmer; Alexander C Huk; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  When is enough enough?

Authors:  Roozbeh Kiani; Timothy D Hanks; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  Neural mechanisms for synthesizing sensory information and producing adaptive behaviors.

Authors:  B E Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Priority of color over scent during flower visitation by adult Vanessa indica butterflies.

Authors:  Hisashi Omura; Keiichi Honda
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Novelty effects in a multimodal warning signal.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Maintaining accuracy at the expense of speed: stimulus similarity defines odor discrimination time in mice.

Authors:  Nixon M Abraham; Hartwig Spors; Alan Carleton; Troy W Margrie; Thomas Kuner; Andreas T Schaefer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Differential parallel processing of olfactory information in the honeybee, Apis mellifera L.

Authors:  D Müller; R Abel; R Brandt; M Zöckler; R Menzel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Odor-sampling time of mice under different conditions.

Authors:  Burton Slotnick
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 3.160

View more
  49 in total

1.  Flower constancy in insect pollinators: Adaptive foraging behaviour or cognitive limitation?

Authors:  Christoph Grüter; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-11-01

2.  Flowers help bees cope with uncertainty: signal detection and the function of floral complexity.

Authors:  Anne S Leonard; Anna Dornhaus; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Female preference for multi-modal courtship: multiple signals are important for male mating success in peacock spiders.

Authors:  Madeline B Girard; Damian O Elias; Michael M Kasumovic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Long-distance communication facilitates cooperation among wild spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta.

Authors:  Andrew S Gersick; Dorothy L Cheney; Jennifer M Schneider; Robert M Seyfarth; Kay E Holekamp
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Learning from learning and memory in bumblebees.

Authors:  Andre J Riveros; Wulfila Gronenberg
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009-09

6.  Interaction between visual and olfactory cues during host finding in the tomato fruit fly Neoceratitis cyanescens.

Authors:  Thierry Brévault; Serge Quilici
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Pollinator Preferences for Floral Volatiles Emitted by Dimorphic Anthers of a Buzz-Pollinated Herb.

Authors:  L Solís-Montero; S Cáceres-García; D Alavez-Rosas; J F García-Crisóstomo; M Vega-Polanco; J Grajales-Conesa; L Cruz-López
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  The innate responses of bumble bees to flower patterns: separating the nectar guide from the nectary changes bee movements and search time.

Authors:  Eben Goodale; Edward Kim; Annika Nabors; Sara Henrichon; James C Nieh
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-05-31

9.  Plasticity of the worker bumblebee brain in relation to age and rearing environment.

Authors:  Beryl M Jones; Anne S Leonard; Daniel R Papaj; Wulfila Gronenberg
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 1.808

10.  Photoreceptor spectral sensitivity in the bumblebee, Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae).

Authors:  Peter Skorupski; Lars Chittka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.