Literature DB >> 10564594

Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals.

.   

Abstract

Many animals produce and respond to signals made up of multiple components. For example, many avian sexual displays are highly extravagant combinations of visual and acoustic elements, and are described as being 'multicomponent'. One possible reason for the evolution of such complex signals is that they provide more reliable information for receivers. However, receivers also influence signal evolution in another important way, by how they perceive and process signals: signallers will be selected to produce signals that are more easily received. The potential role of receiver psychology in the evolution of multicomponent signals has not previously been considered; in this review I present psychological results that support the notion that two components are better received than one alone. Detection can be improved by producing two components together, thus reducing the reaction time, increasing the probability of detection and lowering the intensity at which detection occurs. Discriminability of multicomponent stimuli is also made easier through better recognition, faster discrimination learning and multidimensional generalization. In addition, multicomponent stimuli also improve associative learning. I show that multicomponency does indeed improve signal reception in receivers, although the benefits of producing components in two sensory modalities (bimodal multicomponent signals) may be larger and more robust than producing them in just one (unimodal multicomponent signals). This highlights the need for consideration of receiver psychology in the evolution of multicomponent signals, and suggests that where signal components do not appear to be informative, they may instead be performing an important psychological function. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10564594     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  106 in total

Review 1.  Begging and bleating: the evolution of parent-offspring signalling.

Authors:  H C Godfray; R A Johnstone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis.

Authors:  Peter M Narins; Walter Hödl; Daniela S Grabul
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Optimal assessment of multiple cues.

Authors:  Tim W Fawcett; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Avian psychology and communication.

Authors:  Candy Rowe; John Skelhorn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  A psycho-ethological approach to social signal processing.

Authors:  Marc Mehu; Klaus R Scherer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-02-11

6.  Reliability in aposematic signaling: Thoughts on evolution and aposematic life.

Authors:  Jostein Gohli; Göran Högstedt
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2010-01

7.  Flowers help bees cope with uncertainty: signal detection and the function of floral complexity.

Authors:  Anne S Leonard; Anna Dornhaus; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Female preference for multiple condition-dependent components of a sexually selected signal.

Authors:  Hannes Scheuber; Alain Jacot; Martin W G Brinkhof
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Multicomponent floral signals elicit selective foraging in bumblebees.

Authors:  Robert J Gegear
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-05-10

Review 10.  Sensory exploitation and sexual conflict.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.