Literature DB >> 18196257

Myringoplasty: surgical outcomes and hearing improvement: is it worth performing to improve hearing?

M Karela1, Sandeep Berry, A Watkins, J J Phillipps.   

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to determine the success rate of myringoplasty in adults and children and to examine whether the hearing improvement is a potential indication for surgery. We performed a 6-year prospective audit study in a cohort of patients undergoing myringoplasty at the University Teaching Hospital, Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Two hundred and eleven patients who underwent myringoplasties were included in the study. All were performed by a postaural approach using autologous temporalis fascia and underlay technique. The total success rate, in terms of graft uptake at 3-6 months, was 91.5% and an overall hearing improvement was achieved in 91.5% of cases. This was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Only weak correlation was found between hearing improvement and age (Pearson's r = 0.175, P = 0.024), and there was no significant difference in hearing improvement across gender (P = 0.164), size (P = 0.198) or site (P = 0.447) of the perforation. Myringoplasty is an operation that can improve hearing in many cases independently of age, gender and the size and site of the perforation. Patients who undergo myringoplasty should be advised whilst been consented that there is a good chance of hearing improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18196257     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-007-0570-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  13 in total

1.  A new system of tympanoplasty using vein graft.

Authors:  D F AUSTIN; J J SHEA
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1961-06       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  The principles of plastic surgery of the sound-conducting apparatus.

Authors:  F ZOLLNER
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1955-10       Impact factor: 1.469

3.  Theory and practice of tympanoplasty.

Authors:  H WULLSTEIN
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1956-08       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  A long term view of myringoplasty in children.

Authors:  J D Blanshard; A K Robson; I Smith; A R Maw
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  Tympanoplasty with the interior fascial graft technique and ossicular reconstruction.

Authors:  J V Hough
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Myringoplasty for subtotal perforation.

Authors:  M W Yung
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1995-06

7.  Myringoplasty: does the size of the perforation matter?

Authors:  P Lee; G Kelly; R P Mills
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2002-10

8.  Retrospective analysis of surgical outcome, symptom changes, and hearing improvement following myringoplasty.

Authors:  N A Bhat; R De
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  2000-08

9.  Myringoplasty: is it worth performing in children?

Authors:  N Umapathy; P J Dekker
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-10

10.  Myringoplasty--effects on hearing and contributing factors.

Authors:  J H Black; P J Wormald
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1995-01
View more
  14 in total

1.  Treatment of Large Tympanic Membrane Perforations: Medial to Malleus Versus Lateral to Malleus.

Authors:  Erkan Kulduk; Rıza Dundar; Fatih Kemal Soy; Osman Kadir Guler; Ahmet Yukkaldiran; Ismail Iynen; Ferhat Bozkus
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-04-28

2.  Heparin binding-epidermal growth factor-like growth factor for the regeneration of chronic tympanic membrane perforations in mice.

Authors:  Peter Luke Santa Maria; Sungwoo Kim; Yasin Kursad Varsak; Yunzhi Peter Yang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Ear surgery without microscope; is it possible.

Authors:  Satyawati Mohindra; Naresh K Panda
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-09-24

4.  [Functional and audiological results of tympanoplasty type I using pure perichondrial grafts].

Authors:  A Haisch; J Harder; W Hopfenmüller; B Sedlmaier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Outcome of Interlay Grafting in Type 1 Tympanoplasty for Large Central Perforation.

Authors:  B C Patil; P R Misale; R S Mane; A A Mohite
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-06-24

6.  Heparin Binding Epidermal Growth Factor-Like Growth Factor Heals Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforations With Advantage Over Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 and Epidermal Growth Factor in an Animal Model.

Authors:  Peter Luke Santa Maria; Kendall Weierich; Sungwoo Kim; Yunzhi Peter Yang
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Scaffolds for tympanic membrane regeneration in rats.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Sharon Leanne Redmond; Bing Mei Teh; Sheng Yan; Yan Wang; Lin Zhou; Charley A Budgeon; Robert Henry Eikelboom; Marcus David Atlas; Rodney James Dilley; Minghao Zheng; Robert Jeffery Marano
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Simultaneous myringoplasty and septoplasty, and the use of nasal septal perichondrium.

Authors:  Cevat Uçar; Mustafa Kazkayasi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Longitudinal Study of Type I Interlay Tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Manish Chandra; Satveer Singh Jassal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-08-20

10.  Overlay versus underlay myringoplasty: report of outcomes considering closure of perforation and hearing function.

Authors:  B Sergi; J Galli; E De Corso; C Parrilla; G Paludetti
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.