Literature DB >> 11003075

Retrospective analysis of surgical outcome, symptom changes, and hearing improvement following myringoplasty.

N A Bhat1, R De.   

Abstract

This study examines the surgical and audiologic results of myringoplasty and what factors affect these outcomes. It also examines whether patients experience any improvement in their main symptoms following surgery. This was a retrospective analysis of case notes, patient questionnaires, and audiograms of all patients undergoing myringoplasty between 1990 and 1995 at Walsgrave Hospital, Coventry, UK. Overall success of myringoplasty for consultants was 81% and for trainees was 79%, with an overall success rate of 86% in children. Posterior and inferior perforations had a 90% success rate for repair, compared to only 67% of anterior perforations. There was a statistically significant reduction in air-bone gaps following myringoplasty, and the majority of patients felt that their ears were drier and had improved hearing. Myringoplasty is a successful procedure in the hands of consultants and trainees alike. The results are satisfactory enough to justify surgery purely for deafness and also in symptomatic children. There is a strong correlation between surgical success and resolution of symptoms and generally a satisfactory improvement in hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11003075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0381-6605


  20 in total

1.  Myringoplasty for chronic otitis media.

Authors:  Neeraj Goyal; Vikas Kakkar; Preeti Goyal; S P S Yadav
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Does Nasal Septal Deviation Affect the Success of Tympanoplasty Surgery?

Authors:  M Tan; M T Kalcioglu; M Akarcay; Y Toplu; S Karaca
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 0.171

3.  It is prudent to consider use of endoscopic tympanoplasty to treat complicated middle-ear disease.

Authors:  Zhengcai Lou; Zi-Han Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Influence of middle ear mucosal condition on post-tympanoplasty audiologic outcome.

Authors:  Chan Il Song; Hye Ran Hong; Tae Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Perhaps consider transmeatal approach for microscopic myringoplasty.

Authors:  J Borgstein; C M N Kalule
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Commentary on: comparison of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Zhengcai Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Study of the Etiological Factors of Failures of Myringoplasty: A Observational Study.

Authors:  Sushil K Sharma; Dinesh Kumar; Ramsiya Singh; Ved P Upadhyay; Abhishek K Dubey
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-04-06

8.  Myringoplasty: Impact of Size and Site of Perforation on the Success Rate.

Authors:  Arindam Das; Bhavika Sen; Debashish Ghosh; Arunabha Sengupta
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-12-10

9.  Simultaneous myringoplasty and septoplasty, and the use of nasal septal perichondrium.

Authors:  Cevat Uçar; Mustafa Kazkayasi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Myringoplasty: surgical outcomes and hearing improvement: is it worth performing to improve hearing?

Authors:  M Karela; Sandeep Berry; A Watkins; J J Phillipps
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.