Literature DB >> 18194328

Retention of telescopic denture in elderly patients with maximum partially edentulous arch.

Ivica Stancić1, Aleksandra Jelenković.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The telescopic denture is one possible solution for prosthetic rehabilitation for a partially dentate arch with few remaining teeth, which is the reason why it is usually considered in elderly patients. The system of double crowns consists of the male component of attachment or patrix, which is cemented to the abutment tooth, and the female component of attachment or matrix, which is the removable part of the restoration. Retention force represents resistance to those forces which tend to separate the partial denture and supporting tissue in the occlusal direction. Its optimal value is 5-9 N per each patrix and it should strictly be between these limits as a stronger or weaker force will endanger the functionality of the denture or damage the supporting tissue of the abutment teeth.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to establish the exact value of the individual and total retention force of the completed telescopic system.
METHOD: The Bredent dynamometer was used for measuring these values. The study involved measuring the individual force of separation of 50 patrix-matrix components, and total force of 20 partial dentures of various designs retained by double crowns made in the Dental Laboratory of the Clinic for Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Stomatology, Belgrade University. The research was carried out in the period from January 2006 to October 2006. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: The results showed different values of separation force - from very low values to those exceeding optimal limits. A reduction in the force of separation is necessary in the case of excessive tightness. If there was looseness between patrix and matrix, the cylindrical components of double crowns need to be lined by a suitable composite material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18194328     DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2007.00204.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerodontology        ISSN: 0734-0664            Impact factor:   2.980


  6 in total

1.  Clinical retention force development of double crowns.

Authors:  Stefan Bayer; Helmut Stark; Lina Gölz; Ludger Keilig; Dominik Kraus; Anja Hansen; Norbert Enkling
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Retention force measurement of telescopic crowns.

Authors:  Stefan Bayer; Helmut Stark; Sebastian Mues; Ludger Keilig; Anja Schrader; Norbert Enkling
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Locator® versus ceramic/electroplated double-crown attachments: a prospective study on the intraindividual comparison of implant-supported mandibular prostheses.

Authors:  Silvia Brandt; Jan Brandt; Ali-Reza Ketabi; Hans-Christoph Lauer; Anna Kunzmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Wear of double crown systems: electroplated vs. casted female part.

Authors:  Stefan Bayer; Dominik Kraus; Ludger Keilig; Lina Gölz; Helmut Stark; Norbert Enkling
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Comparison of retention forces with various fabrication methods and materials in double crowns.

Authors:  Melahat Çelik Güven; Meral Tuna; Ergun Bozdağ; Gizem Nur Öztürk; Gulsen Bayraktar
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 6.  Telescopic Denture.

Authors:  Mohammad Ayham Hakkoum; Ghassan Wazir
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2018-03-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.