Literature DB >> 18186684

Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.

Harprit Singh1, Arvind Ganpule, Vineet Malhotra, T Manohar, V Muthu, Mahesh Desai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction remains the most common cause of hydronephrosis in newborns and children. Open pyeloplasty has been the gold standard for management of UPJ obstruction in these patients. We report our technique and outcome with laparoscopic transperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients, ages 2 to 14 years, underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty at our center between June 2004 and December 2006. Thirteen pyeloplasties were on the left side and six on the right side. A transmesocolic approach was used in five left-sided UPJ obstructions. All operations were performed by the transperitoneal route using either three or four ports.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent dismembered (Anderson-Hynes) pyeloplasty, while three had a nondismembered Foley's Y-V pyeloplasty. Mean operative time was 198 minutes (range 105-300 min). Mean estimated blood loss was 45 mL (range 30-130 mL). Mean length of stay was 4 days (range 3-5 d). Mean followup was 13.8 months (range 2-30 mos). Postoperatively, one child had a urinary tract infection that necessitated hospital admission and administration of intravenous antibiotics. Eighteen of 19 patients demonstrated improved drainage with no evidence of obstruction on diuretic renography and/or excretory urography. One patient is awaiting follow-up. There was no conversion to open surgery.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children is a safe, minimally invasive treatment option that duplicates the principles and techniques of definitive open surgical repair. It is technically challenging; with increasing expertise, operative times are reduced significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18186684     DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  7 in total

1.  An updated meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.

Authors:  Yidong Huang; Yang Wu; Wei Shan; Li Zeng; Lugang Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

2.  Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children less than 20 kg by weight: single-center experience.

Authors:  Arvind Ganpule; Ankush Jairath; Abhishek Singh; Shashikant Mishra; Ravindra Sabnis; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Laparoendoscopic single-site urologic surgery in children less than 5 years of age.

Authors:  Arvind Ganpule; Chetan Sheladiya; Shashikant Mishra; Ravindra Sabnis; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-08-07

4.  Study comparing the applicability of dorsal lumbotomy in older children.

Authors:  Jonathan Cloutier; Nadim Haidar; Marie-Pier Rompre-Deschenes; Maryse Grimard; Stéphane Bolduc
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Pyeloplasty techniques using minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Francesco Turrà; Maria Escolino; Alessandra Farina; Alessandro Settimi; Ciro Esposito; François Varlet
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2016-10

6.  Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  Rajendra B Nerli; Mallikarjun Reddy; Vikram Prabha; Ashish Koura; Praveen Patne; M K Ganesh
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: experience of 226 cases at one centre.

Authors:  Marcin Polok; Dominika Borselle; Krystian Toczewski; Wojciech Apoznański; Diana Jędrzejuk; Dariusz Patkowski
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.318

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.