Literature DB >> 21539770

Study comparing the applicability of dorsal lumbotomy in older children.

Jonathan Cloutier1, Nadim Haidar, Marie-Pier Rompre-Deschenes, Maryse Grimard, Stéphane Bolduc.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: : Dismembered pyeloplasty through dorsal lumbotomy to correct ureteropelvic junction obstruction is mainly successfully performed in children under 5 years old for technical reasons. We compared children who underwent dorsal lumbotomy by age group (<5 vs. ≥5 years old) to determine if the surgical success and long-term results were comparable.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: : We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 134 children undergoing a pyeloplasty. Group 1 consisted of children <5 years old (n = 90) and Group 2 consisted of children ≥5 years old. Patients' characteristics, as well as hospital stay, narcotic use, radiologic follow-up and success rate, were compared. Success was defined by absence of symptoms and ≥50% reduction in renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter and/or scintigraphic normalization of the drainage T1/2 when obtained. Univariate analysis was performed to compare the groups.
RESULTS: : Mean age (years) and weight (kg) at surgery for Groups 1 and 2 were 1/8 kg and 11/35 kg, respectively. Mean operative time was 98 minutes versus 120 minutes, respectively; mean hospital stay was 2.5 days for both groups and analgesia requirement was 50% higher in Group 2. A Pippi-Salle stent was used in 90% (n = 120) of cases. Mean follow-up was 26 months and the success rate was 89% and 90% for Groups 1 and 2, respectively.
CONCLUSION: : Our study showed comparable success rates. We can infer that, as a technique, dismembered pyeloplasty is effective and safe in the younger and older children.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 21539770      PMCID: PMC3526625          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.10064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  12 in total

1.  Dorsal lumbotomy incision for pediatric pyeloplasty--a good alternative.

Authors:  R Kumar; G Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient.

Authors:  Pasquale Casale; Richard W Grady; Byron D Joyner; Ilia S Zeltser; T Ernesto Figueroa; Michael E Mitchell
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Dorsal lumbotomy incision in paediatric pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Minu Bajpai; Arbinder Kumar; Madhavi Tripathi; Chandrashekhar S Bal
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  The dorsal lumbotomy incision in pediatric urological surgery.

Authors:  S M Orland; H M Snyder; J W Duckett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties.

Authors:  Luis H P Braga; Armando J Lorenzo; Walid A Farhat; Darius J Bägli; Antoine E Khoury; Joao L Pippi Salle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Posterior lumbotomy in pediatric pyeloplasty.

Authors:  R Gonzalez; H Aliabadi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children: comparison with open surgery.

Authors:  Lisandro A Piaggio; Julie Franc-Guimond; Paul H Noh; Mark Wehry; T Ernesto Figueroa; Julia Barthold; Ricardo González
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The minimally invasive open pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Job K Chacko; Martin A Koyle; Gerald C Mingin; Peter D Furness
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 1.830

9.  A comparison of open vs laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty using the pediatric health information system database--do benefits of laparoscopic approach recede at younger ages?

Authors:  Stacy T Tanaka; John A Grantham; John C Thomas; Mark C Adams; John W Brock; John C Pope
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  Harprit Singh; Arvind Ganpule; Vineet Malhotra; T Manohar; V Muthu; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  3 in total

1.  Revving up our service to Canadian Urology: CUAJ a proud venue.

Authors:  D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Intensification de nos services à l'urologie canadienne : le JAUC, un périodique fier.

Authors:  D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Honestly and carefully assessing outcomes of dorsal lumbotomy incision for pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  Barry Kogan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.