Literature DB >> 26131065

An updated meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.

Yidong Huang1, Yang Wu1, Wei Shan1, Li Zeng1, Lugang Huang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To further explore the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction compared with open pyeloplasty (OP).
METHODS: PUBMED, Web of science and Cochrane library were searched until Oct. 2014 to find eligible studies. WMD, OR, RD and their 95% CIs were used to estimate the difference. Baseline such as age, gender and crossing vessel, perioperative outcomes such as length of stay, operative time, overall complications, and success rate were compared. All the meta-analyses were performed in Revman 5.2.
RESULTS: 15 comparative studies and one RCT were eligible and included in the meta-analysis. Compared with OP, LP groups might be associated with shorted length of hospital stay (WMD: -1.92, 95% CI: -2.45--1.39), reduced complications (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.49-1.01) and equal success rate (RD: 0.01, 95% CI: -0.02-0.04), but prolonged operative time (WMD: 48.64, 95% CI: 31.16-66.12).
CONCLUSION: Our findings supported that laparoscopic pyeloplasty is feasibility and safety in the treatment of UPJ obstruction in children, especially in high-volume centers with experienced experts. Considering the select bias and recall bias, more RCTs are required to further explore the efficiencies of LP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty; children; meta-analysis; ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Year:  2015        PMID: 26131065      PMCID: PMC4483847     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  25 in total

1.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Xisheng Wang; Zejian Zhang; Naixiong Peng; Chunxiao Liu
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.535

2.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty in children from age of 3 years: our clinical outcomes compared with open surgery.

Authors:  Fred van der Toorn; Joop van den Hoek; Katja P Wolffenbuttel; Jeroen R Scheepe
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 1.830

3.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: preliminary report of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Heidi A Penn; John M Gatti; Sara M Hoestje; Romano T DeMarco; Charles L Snyder; J Patrick Murphy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year experience.

Authors:  Lars Henning Olsen; Yazan F Rawashdeh; Troels M Jorgensen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Cytokine responses following laparoscopic or open pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  Longxin Wang; Weijun Qin; Feng Tian; Geng Zhang; Jianglin Yuan; He Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Surgical management of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a Pediatric Health Information System database study.

Authors:  Vijaya M Vemulakonda; Charles A Cowan; Thomas S Lendvay; Byron D Joyner; Richard W Grady
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  National trends of perioperative outcomes and costs for open, laparoscopic and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Briony K Varda; Emilie K Johnson; Curtis Clark; Benjamin I Chung; Caleb P Nelson; Steven L Chang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Retroperitoneoscopic vs open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.

Authors:  J S Valla; J Breaud; S J Griffin; N Sautot-Vial; F Beretta; R Guana; T Gelas; X Carpentier; R Leculee; H Steyaert
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 1.830

9.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  Harprit Singh; Arvind Ganpule; Vineet Malhotra; T Manohar; V Muthu; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: 4-year experience.

Authors:  Po N Lam; Carson Wong; Timothy L Mulholland; Jeffery B Campbell; Bradley P Kropp
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  10 in total

1.  [Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children].

Authors:  F Vauth; W H Rösch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Long Term Outcome of 112 Pediatric Patients With Ureteroplevic Junction Obstruction Treated by Endourologic Retrograde Balloon Dilatation.

Authors:  Javier Ordóñez; Rubén Ortiz; Alberto Parente; Laura Burgos; Beatriz Fernández-Bautista; Laura Pérez-Egido; José María Angulo
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 3.  A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery.

Authors:  Paul Stephen Cullis; Katrin Gudlaugsdottir; James Andrews
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparative, Prospective, Case-Control Study of Open versus Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Children with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Long-term Results.

Authors:  Lisandro A Piaggio; Juan P Corbetta; Santiago Weller; Ricardo Augusto Dingevan; Víctor Duran; Javier Ruiz; Juan C Lopez
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.418

5.  Minimally invasive open dismembered pyeloplasty technique: Miniature incision, muscle-splitting dissection, and nopelvis reduction in children.

Authors:  Farzaneh Sharifiaghdas; Mahboubeh Mirzaei; Azar Daneshpajooh; Shahin Abbaszadeh
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-08-11

6.  Reflective Practice About Retroperitoneal Laparoscopy in Comparison to Open Surgery for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair in Children Less Than 1 Year of Age.

Authors:  Anthony Kallas-Chemaly; Matthieu Peycelon; Liza Ali; Christine Grapin-Dagorno; Elisabeth Carricaburu; Pascale Philippe-Chomette; Goharig Enezian; Annabel Paye-Jaouen; Alaa El-Ghoneimi
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Antegrade stent placement in laparoscopic upper urinary tract surgery. Is there an easy way?

Authors:  Kaan Gökçen; Gökhan Gökçe; Yakup Kordan; Emre Kıraç; Gökçe Dündar; Emin Yener Gültekin
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 1.195

8.  A comparative study on the Efficacy of Retroperitoneoscopic Pyeloplasty and Open Surgery for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children.

Authors:  Jianghua Jia; Qingsong Meng; Ming Zhang; Jinchun Qi; Dongbin Wang
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

9.  Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery-A Bibliometric Study on 30 Years of Research Activity.

Authors:  Boshen Shu; Xiaoyan Feng; Illya Martynov; Martin Lacher; Steffi Mayer
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-21

10.  Surgical approaches for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction - a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Annemarie Uhlig; Johannes Uhlig; Lutz Trojan; Marc Hinterthaner; Alexander von Hammerstein-Equord; Arne Strauss
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.264

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.