Literature DB >> 19255763

Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.

Rajendra B Nerli1, Mallikarjun Reddy, Vikram Prabha, Ashish Koura, Praveen Patne, M K Ganesh.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children has been proven to be safe and effective, with comparable results to open surgery. Due to the extension of laparoscopic indications from ablative to reconstructive procedures requiring endoscopic suturing, most centres have plateaued within their learning curve. Based on our own experience with a little more than 100 cases, we focus on the complications and the definitive learning curve of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 103 laparoscopic pyeloplasties were performed during the period January 2002 to June 2008. Of these, 102 underwent laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty and one underwent laparoscopic vascular hitch for crossing lower pole vessels. Intraoperative incidents/complications were analysed using the Satava classification, and the postoperative complications according to the Clavien classification.
RESULTS: Intraoperative incidents occurred in 2.91% of the cases, mostly without consequences for the child including faulty port placement needing placement of an extra port and umbilical port side bleed. Postoperative complications occurred in 11.65% children and included prolonged ileus, prolonged urinary leak, fever, haematuria and recurrent ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) stenosis. Recurrent UPJ stenosis occurred in 4.85% of children needing reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children is not only feasible, but safe and effective. Intraoperative incidents occur in up to 3% of the cases, and complications in 12.9-15.8%. Increased experience, training and knowledge regarding the incidence and management of complications will be able to further reduce these in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19255763     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-009-2341-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  19 in total

1.  Geometry of laparoscopic suturing and knotting techniques.

Authors:  T Frede; C Stock; C Renner; Z Budair; Y Abdel-Salam; J Rassweiler
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Laparoscopic and robotic approach to genitourinary anomalies in children.

Authors:  Craig A Peters
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Clavien; J R Sanabria; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  H L Tan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  Mallikarjun Reddy; R B Nerli; Rajeev Bashetty; I R Ravish
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Clinical assessment of pelvic and ureteral function.

Authors:  R H Whitaker
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.

Authors:  C A Peters; R N Schlussel; A B Retik
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Dogu Teber; Thomas Frede
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  Harprit Singh; Arvind Ganpule; Vineet Malhotra; T Manohar; V Muthu; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: 4-year experience.

Authors:  Po N Lam; Carson Wong; Timothy L Mulholland; Jeffery B Campbell; Bradley P Kropp
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  4 in total

1.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: the SGPGI experience.

Authors:  Ruchir Maheshwari; M S Ansari; Anil Mandhani; Aneesh Srivastava; Rakesh Kapoor
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

2.  Categorization of intraoperative ureteroscopy complications using modified Satava classification system.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Berkan Resorlu; Tolga Sahin; Selcuk Sarikaya; Mirze Bayindir; Ural Oguz; Abdullah Armagan; Ali Unsal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Morbidity assessment in surgery: refinement proposal based on a concept of perioperative adverse events.

Authors:  Airazat M Kazaryan; Bård I Røsok; Bjørn Edwin
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2013-05-16

4.  High-pressure balloon assessment of pelviureteric junction prior to laparoscopic "vascular hitch".

Authors:  Alberto Parente; Jose-Maria Angulo; Rosa Romero; Laura Burgos; Ruben Ortiz
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.