Literature DB >> 18183410

The Oxford shoulder score revisited.

Jill Dawson1, Katherine Rogers, Ray Fitzpatrick, Andrew Carr.   

Abstract

The validated, patient-reported Oxford shoulder score (OSS) was introduced around 10 years ago, primarily for the assessment of outcomes of shoulder surgery (excluding shoulder stabilisation) in randomised trials. Its uptake has steadily increased in a number of countries and its use has also been extended. Recently a number of issues have been raised in relation to other related patient-reported outcome measures which were devised around the same time as the OSS. This included recommendations to change the scoring system. This paper reviews issues concerning patient-reported outcome measures that apply to the OSS and makes some recommendations (including changes to the scoring system) as to how it should be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18183410     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-007-0549-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  97 in total

1.  The range of the Oxford Shoulder Score in the asymptomatic population: a marker for post-operative improvement.

Authors:  F Younis; J Sultan; S Dix; P J Hughes
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Shoulder outcome measures: is there a right answer?

Authors:  James E Beastall; Shona Fielding; Eva Christie; Alan J Johnstone
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  The use of shoulder scoring systems and outcome measures in the UK.

Authors:  M Varghese; J Lamb; R Rambani; B Venkateswaran
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Italian version of the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score.

Authors:  Benedetta Mazzoni; Davide Cucchi; Tiziano Giovannelli; Matteo Paci; Paolo Arrigoni; Simone Nicoletti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Patient-reported outcome measures: an on-line system empowering patient choice.

Authors:  J Wilson; F Arshad; N Nnamoko; A Whiteman; J Ring; B Roy
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Factors affecting short- and long-term outcomes of manipulation under anaesthesia in patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder.

Authors:  Anthony A Theodorides; John M Owen; Adrian E Sayers; David A Woods
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2014-04-08

7.  Bone Osteolysis Following Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction Using Synthetic Ligament (Surgilig™).

Authors:  Praveen Sarda; Andrew M Richards; Steven A Corbett
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2013-08-23

8.  Comparison of bony increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty and standard reverse shoulder arthroplasty outcomes.

Authors:  Muhammad Umar; Michael Hughes; Lisa-Marie Barrington-Ford; Kaira Pearson; Mohammad Waseem
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-06

9.  Is fibromyalgia a cause of failure in the treatment of a painful shoulder?

Authors:  D Blonna; E Bellato; E Marini; N Barbasetti; L Mattei; F Fissore; C Arrigoni; F Castoldi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-04-16

Review 10.  Ultrasound-Guided Versus Anatomic Landmark-Guided Steroid Injection of the Subacromial Bursa in the Management of Subacromial Impingement: A Systematic Review of Randomised Control Studies.

Authors:  Charles I Ayekoloye; Osondu Nwangwu
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.