Literature DB >> 24013090

Patient-reported outcome measures: an on-line system empowering patient choice.

J Wilson1, F Arshad2, N Nnamoko3, A Whiteman4, J Ring1, B Roy4.   

Abstract

An innovative web-based system was developed to allow patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to be easily administered. Stakeholders guided the design and implementation. The software gives patients access to their current and previous scores. This pilot study focused on patients undergoing arthroscopic subacromial decompression, evaluated using the Oxford shoulder score (OSS). Patients showing good improvement in their OSS were offered the choice to return for routine follow-up clinic appointments, or continue rehabilitation, reassured by their improved score. Thirty-six of 117 patients were eligible. Thirty of these (83%) were opted to avoid further clinics. PROMs 2.0 can be used for any medical intervention with a validated PROM. Evolution and refinement is ongoing. Funding has been granted for 12 primary and secondary healthcare trusts to implement PROMs 2.0. Further work is needed to assess economic impact, patient views and satisfaction with the process. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Innovation; Measure; Outcome; Patient Choice; clinical decision support; eHealth

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24013090      PMCID: PMC4078267          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  4 in total

1.  The Oxford shoulder score revisited.

Authors:  Jill Dawson; Katherine Rogers; Ray Fitzpatrick; Andrew Carr
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings.

Authors:  Jill Dawson; Helen Doll; Ray Fitzpatrick; Crispin Jenkinson; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-18

3.  A pilot randomized, controlled trial of treatment for painful arc of the shoulder.

Authors:  David J Cloke; Helen Watson; Sarah Purdy; I Nick Steen; John R Williams
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; A Carr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-07
  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Patient and clinician perspectives on a patient-facing dashboard that visualizes patient reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Lucy H Liu; Sarah B Garrett; Jing Li; Dana Ragouzeos; Beth Berrean; Daniel Dohan; Patricia P Katz; Jennifer L Barton; Jinoos Yazdany; Gabriela Schmajuk
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Meaningful patient and public involvement in digital health innovation, implementation and evaluation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Baines; Hannah Bradwell; Katie Edwards; Sebastian Stevens; Samantha Prime; John Tredinnick-Rowe; Miles Sibley; Arunangsu Chatterjee
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 3.318

3.  Comparison of patient- and clinician-reported outcome measures in lower back rehabilitation: introducing a new integrated performance measure (t2D).

Authors:  Andrej Zdravkovic; Vincent Grote; Michael Pirchl; Martin Stockinger; Richard Crevenna; Michael J Fischer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.