Literature DB >> 18182666

Nodal stage classification for breast carcinoma: improving interobserver reproducibility through standardized histologic criteria and image-based training.

Roderick R Turner1, Donald L Weaver, Gabor Cserni, Susan C Lester, Karen Hirsch, David A Elashoff, Patrick L Fitzgibbons, Giuseppe Viale, Giovanni Mazzarol, Julio A Ibarra, Stuart J Schnitt, Armando E Giuliano.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Reliable pathologic stage classification of axillary lymph nodes is an important determinant of prognosis and therapeutic decision making for patients with invasive breast cancer. Pathologists' distinction between micrometastasis (pN1mi) and isolated tumor cells [ITC; pN0(i+)] is variable using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual (Sixth Edition). We sought to determine whether a set of clearly defined histologic criteria could lead to reproducible nodal classification by pathologists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Digital images of sentinel lymph node biopsies from 56 patients with small-volume nodal metastases were examined by six experienced breast pathologists (MDs), first as a pre-test, and again as a post-test after studying a training program that outlined and illustrated the classification criteria.
RESULTS: Post-test results, after study of the training program, were significantly improved. Compared with the reference MD, agreement improved from 76.2% (pre-test kappa = 0.575; standard deviation [SD], 0.25) to 97.3% (post-test kappa = 0.947; SD, 0.049). Multirater analysis of agreement among the six MDs improved from 71.5% (pre-test kappa = 0.487; ASE, 0.039) to 95.7% (post-test kappa = 0.915; ASE, 0.037). Agreement on lobular carcinoma metastasis classification improved from 55% (23 of 42; pre-test) to 100% (42 of 42; post-test) (P < .001), and agreement on ITC classification in nodal parenchyma improved from 67.6% (69 of 102; pre-test) to 98.0% (100 of 102; post-test; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Application of current definitions for classification of small-volume nodal metastases are inconsistent, leading to variable classification of ITC and micrometastases. Reproducibility of pathologic nodal stage classification is achievable through study of a training set to clarify the AJCC criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18182666     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.0179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  18 in total

Review 1.  Minimal disease in sentinel nodes.

Authors:  Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  A quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assay for rapid, automated analysis of breast cancer sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Steven J Hughes; Liqiang Xi; William E Gooding; David J Cole; Michael Mitas; John Metcalf; Rohit Bhargava; David Dabbs; Jesus Ching; Lynn Kozma; William McMillan; Tony E Godfrey
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Lymph node micrometastasis in N stage: a call for more evidence.

Authors:  Yijiu Ren; Chenyang Dai; Huikang Xie; Yunlang She; Hang Su; Chang Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Ratio between positive lymph nodes and total excised axillary lymph nodes as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with nonmetastatic lymph node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Hassan A Hatoum; Faek R Jamali; Nagi S El-Saghir; Khaled M Musallam; Muhieddine Seoud; Hani Dimassi; Jaber Abbas; Mohamad Khalife; Fouad I Boulos; Ayman N Tawil; Fadi B Geara; Ziad Salem; Achraf A Shamseddine; Karine Al-Feghali; Ali I Shamseddine
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-08-07

5.  Predicting non-sentinel lymph node status after positive sentinel biopsy in breast cancer: what model performs the best in a Czech population?

Authors:  Oldrich Coufal; Tomás Pavlík; Pavel Fabian; Rita Bori; Gábor Boross; István Sejben; Róbert Maráz; Jaroslav Koca; Eva Krejcí; Iva Horáková; Vendula Foltinová; Pavlína Vrtelová; Vojtech Chrenko; Wolde Eliza Tekle; Mária Rajtár; Mihály Svébis; Vuk Fait; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.201

6.  Patients' choice on axillary lymph node dissection following sentinel lymph node micrometastasis--first report on prospective use of a nomogram in very low risk patients.

Authors:  Gábor Cserni; Istvánné Bezsenyi; László Markó
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.201

7.  Importance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thin melanoma.

Authors:  Byron E Wright; Randall P Scheri; Xing Ye; Mark B Faries; Roderick R Turner; Richard Essner; Donald L Morton
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-09

Review 8.  [Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: pathological analysis and interpretation].

Authors:  G Cserni; T Decker
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 9.  Prognostic and predictive factors and genetic analysis of early breast cancer.

Authors:  Miguel Martín; Fernando González Palacios; Javier Cortés; Juan de la Haba; José Schneider
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 10.  Sentinel lymph nodes for breast carcinoma: an update on current practice.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Edi Brogi
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.