Literature DB >> 19440855

Predicting non-sentinel lymph node status after positive sentinel biopsy in breast cancer: what model performs the best in a Czech population?

Oldrich Coufal1, Tomás Pavlík, Pavel Fabian, Rita Bori, Gábor Boross, István Sejben, Róbert Maráz, Jaroslav Koca, Eva Krejcí, Iva Horáková, Vendula Foltinová, Pavlína Vrtelová, Vojtech Chrenko, Wolde Eliza Tekle, Mária Rajtár, Mihály Svébis, Vuk Fait, Gábor Cserni.   

Abstract

Several models have previously been proposed to predict the probability of non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastases after a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of two previously published nomograms (MSKCC, Stanford) and to develop an alternative model with the best predictive accuracy in a Czech population. In the basic population of 330 SLN-positive patients from the Czech Republic, the accuracy of the MSKCC and the Stanford nomograms was tested by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). A new model (MOU nomogram) was proposed according to the results of multivariate analysis of relevant clinicopathologic variables. The new model was validated in an independent test population from Hungary (383 patients). In the basic population, six of 27 patients with isolated tumor cells (ITC) in the SLN harbored additional NSLN metastases. The AUCs of the MSKCC and Stanford nomograms were 0.68 and 0.66, respectively; for the MOU nomogram it reached 0.76. In the test population, the AUC of the MOU nomogram was similar to that of the basic population (0.74). The presence of only ITC in SLN does not preclude further nodal involvement. Additional variables are beneficial when considering the probability of NSLN metastases. In the basic population, the previously published nomograms (MSKCC and Stanford) showed only limited accuracy. The developed MOU nomogram proved more suitable for the basic population, such as for another independent population from a mid-European country.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19440855     DOI: 10.1007/s12253-009-9177-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  26 in total

Review 1.  Complete sectioning of axillary sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer. Analysis of two different step sectioning and immunohistochemistry protocols in 246 patients.

Authors:  G Cserni
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Low performance of the MSKCC nomogram in preoperatively ultrasonically negative axillary lymph node in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Janez Zgajnar; Andraz Perhavec; Marko Hocevar; Maja Podkrajsek; Kristijana Hertl; Snjezana Frkovic-Grazio; Maja Pohar; Nikola Besic
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Can the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram predict the likelihood of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients in the Netherlands?

Authors:  Marjolein L Smidt; Deborah M Kuster; Gert Jan van der Wilt; Frederik B Thunnissen; Kimberley J Van Zee; Luc J A Strobbe
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram.

Authors:  Amy C Degnim; Carol Reynolds; Gouri Pantvaidya; Shaheen Zakaria; Tanya Hoskin; Sunni Barnes; Margaret V Roberts; Peter C Lucas; Kevin Oh; Meryem Koker; Michael S Sabel; Lisa A Newman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node positivity.

Authors:  N K Soni; H L Carmalt; D J Gillett; A J Spillane
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Use and limitations of a nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after a positive sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Lajos Kocsis; Mihály Svébis; Gábor Boross; Mária Sinkó; Róbert Maráz; Mária Rajtár; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Distinction between isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in breast cancer: is it reliable and useful?

Authors:  Isabelle de Mascarel; Gaetan MacGrogan; Marc Debled; Veronique Brouste; Louis Mauriac
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Comparison of two models for the prediction of nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer.

Authors:  Riccardo Ponzone; Furio Maggiorotto; Luca Mariani; Maria Elena Jacomuzzi; Alessandra Magistris; Paola Mininanni; Nicoletta Biglia; Piero Sismondi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Nodal stage classification for breast carcinoma: improving interobserver reproducibility through standardized histologic criteria and image-based training.

Authors:  Roderick R Turner; Donald L Weaver; Gabor Cserni; Susan C Lester; Karen Hirsch; David A Elashoff; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Giuseppe Viale; Giovanni Mazzarol; Julio A Ibarra; Stuart J Schnitt; Armando E Giuliano
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Consensus on the regional lymph nodes irradiation in breast cancer.

Authors:  E Bayo; I Herruzo; M Arenas; M Algara
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Breast Carcinoma: A Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Edi Brogi
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Development of a prediction model based on LASSO regression to evaluate the risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in Chinese breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Lei Meng; Ting Zheng; Yuanyuan Wang; Zhao Li; Qi Xiao; Junfeng He; Jinxiang Tan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Factors Influencing Non-sentinel Node Involvement in Sentinel Node Positive Patients and Validation of MSKCC Nomogram in Indian Breast Cancer Population.

Authors:  Naveen Padmanabhan; Muhamed Faizal Ayub; Khadher Hussain; Ann Kurien; Selvi Radhakrishna
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-12-05

5.  A simple risk score to predict the presence of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node.

Authors:  Raquel F D van la Parra; Petronella G M Peer; Wilfred K de Roos; Miranda F Ernst; Johannes H W de Wilt; Koop Bosscha
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Multicenter validation of two nomograms to predict non-sentinel node involvement in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio Piñero; Manuel Canteras; Arancha Moreno; Francisco Vicente; Julia Giménez; Ana Tocino; Edelmiro Iglesias; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Luzdivina Santamaría; Miguel Lorenzo; Manuel García; Diego Ramirez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Multi-institutional comparison of non-sentinel lymph node predictive tools in breast cancer patients with high predicted risk of further axillary metastasis.

Authors:  Gábor Cserni; Rita Bori; Róbert Maráz; Marjut H K Leidenius; Tuomo J Meretoja; Paivi S Heikkila; Peter Regitnig; Gero Luschin-Ebengreuth; Janez Zgajnar; Andraz Perhavec; Barbara Gazic; György Lázár; Tibor Takács; András Vörös; Riccardo A Audisio
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 3.201

8.  Establishing a prediction model of axillary nodal burden based on the combination of CT and ultrasound findings and the clinicopathological features in patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Xianfu Sun; Qiang Zhang; Lianjie Niu; Tao Huang; Yingjie Wang; Shengze Zhang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-02

9.  CK19 mRNA in blood can predict non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Xing-Fei Yu; Hong-Jian Yang; Lei Lei; Chen Wang; Jian Huang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-24

10.  Application of artificial neural networks for predicting presence of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsies.

Authors:  Tomasz Nowikiewicz; Paweł Wnuk; Bogdan Małkowski; Andrzej Kurylcio; Janusz Kowalewski; Wojciech Zegarski
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.