Literature DB >> 19797614

A quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assay for rapid, automated analysis of breast cancer sentinel lymph nodes.

Steven J Hughes1, Liqiang Xi, William E Gooding, David J Cole, Michael Mitas, John Metcalf, Rohit Bhargava, David Dabbs, Jesus Ching, Lynn Kozma, William McMillan, Tony E Godfrey.   

Abstract

We have previously reported that a quantitative reverse transcription (QRT)-PCR assay accurately analyzes sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to assess a completely automated, cartridge-based version of the assay for accuracy, predictive value, and reproducibility. The triplex (two markers + control) QRT-PCR assay was incorporated into a single-use cartridge for point-of-care use on the GeneXpert system. Three academic centers participated equally. Twenty-nine positive lymph nodes and 30 negative lymph nodes were analyzed to establish classification rules. SLNs from 120 patients were subsequently analyzed by QRT-PCR and histology (including immunohistochemistry), and the predetermined decision rules were used to classify the SLNs; 112 SLN specimens produced an informative result by both QRT-PCR and histology. By histological analysis, 21 SLNs were positive and 91 SLNs were negative for metastasis. QRT-PCR characterization produced a classification with 100% sensitivity, 97.8% specificity, and 98.2% accuracy compared with histology (91.3% positive predictive value and 100% negative predictive value). Interlaboratory reproducibility analyses demonstrated that a 95% prediction interval for a new measurement (DeltaCt) ranged between 0.403 and 0.956. This fully automated QRT-PCR assay accurately characterizes breast cancer SLNs for the presence of metastasis. Furthermore, the assay is not dependent on subjective interpretation, is reproducible across three clinical environments, and is rapid enough to allow intraoperative decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19797614      PMCID: PMC2765757          DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.090037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  33 in total

1.  Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Authors:  C Chao; S L Wong; D Ackermann; D Simpson; M B Carter; C M Brown; M J Edwards; K M McMasters
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Sentinel lymph node evaluation for tumor metastasis.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hunt; Zubair W Baloch; Virginia A LiVolsi
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Combining several screening tests: optimality of the risk score.

Authors:  Martin W McIntosh; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Temperature-controlled primer limit for multiplexing of rapid, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assays: application to intraoperative cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Siva Raja; Talal El-Hefnawy; Lori A Kelly; Melissa L Chestney; James D Luketich; Tony E Godfrey
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 5.  Prognostic significance of micrometastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Michael C Coello; James D Luketich; Virginia R Litle; Tony E Godfrey
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 6.  Sentinel node biopsy: interpretation and management of patients with immunohistochemistry-positive sentinel nodes and those with micrometastases.

Authors:  Emiel J T Rutgers
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Prognostic value of quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in lymph node-negative esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  T E Godfrey; S Raja; S D Finkelstein; W E Gooding; L A Kelly; J D Luketich
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Variability in the levels of PML-RAR alpha fusion transcripts detected by the laboratories participating in an external quality control program using several reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction protocols.

Authors:  P Bolufer; F Lo Coco; D Grimwade; E Barragán; D Diverio; B Cassinat; C Chomienne; M Gonzalez; D Colomer; M T Gomez; I Marugan; J Román; M D Delgado; J A García-Marco; R Bornstein; J L Vizmanos; B Martinez; J Jansen; A Villegas; J M de Blas; P Cabello; M A Sanz
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  Interlaboratory evaluation of a new reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of circulating melanoma cells: a multicenter study of the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  U Reinhold; C Berkin; A K Bosserhoff; A Deutschmann; C Garbe; R Gläser; R Hein; G Krähn; R U Peter; G Rappl; B Schittek; S Seiter; S Ugurel; M Volkenandt; W Tilgen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Interpretive disparity among pathologists in breast sentinel lymph node evaluation.

Authors:  Cory A Roberts; Peter D Beitsch; Craig E Litz; D Sue Hilton; Gene E Ewing; Edward Clifford; Walton Taylor; Marc R Hapke; Armineh Babaian; Imrana Khalid; Joe D Hall; Guy Lindberg; Kyle Molberg; Hossein Saboorian
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  5 in total

1.  An intra-operative RT-LAMP method allows rapid and reliable detection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Hao; Yi Liu; Xiru Li; Hua Kang; Xiang Qu; Jianmiao He; Haixu Hu; Yan Huang; Bing Liu; Chengze Yu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Rapid molecular detection of metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma as an intraoperative adjunct to sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Robert L Ferris; Patrick Stefanika; Liqiang Xi; William Gooding; Raja R Seethala; Tony E Godfrey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Intraoperative qRT-PCR for detection of lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Robert L Ferris; Liqiang Xi; Raja R Seethala; Jon Chan; Shaun Desai; Benjamin Hoch; William Gooding; Tony E Godfrey
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Lymphatics, lymph nodes and the immune system: barriers and gateways for cancer spread.

Authors:  Robert L Ferris; Michael T Lotze; Stanley P L Leong; David S B Hoon; Donald L Morton
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.150

5.  A population-based validation study of the DCIS Score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone.

Authors:  Eileen Rakovitch; Sharon Nofech-Mozes; Wedad Hanna; Frederick L Baehner; Refik Saskin; Steven M Butler; Alan Tuck; Sandip Sengupta; Leela Elavathil; Prashant A Jani; Michel Bonin; Martin C Chang; Susan J Robertson; Elzbieta Slodkowska; Cindy Fong; Joseph M Anderson; Farid Jamshidian; Dave P Miller; Diana B Cherbavaz; Steven Shak; Lawrence Paszat
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.872

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.