Literature DB >> 18178952

High peritoneal permeability is not associated with higher mortality or technique failure in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis.

Xiao Yang1, Wei Fang, Joanne M Bargman, Dimitrios G Oreopoulos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) who have high small-molecule peritoneal transport have increased mortality.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of baseline peritoneal transport characteristics on patient and technique survival in incident peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, most of whom are on automated PD (APD), with the use of icodextrin.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study.
SETTING: A single PD unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 193 new patients that began PD between January 2000 and September 2004, and had an initial peritoneal equilibration test within 6 months of commencement of PD. Patients were divided into low (L), low average (LA), high average (HA), and high (H) peritoneal transport groups. Death-censored technique failure and patient survival were examined.
RESULTS: Of the 193 patients, 151 (78.1%) were on APD or on APD with icodextrin or on CAPD with icodextrin. At the end of 1, 3, and 5 years, patient survival was 91%, 82%, and 67% in LA group; 95%, 77%, and 69% in HA group; and 96%, 71%, and 71% in H group. Technique survival was 100%, 90%, and 77% in LA group; 96%, 84%, and 72% in HA group; and 92%, 87%, and 77% in H group. High peritoneal permeability did not predict worse patient survival or technique failure, while age, diabetes, a lower glomerular filtration rate, and high body mass index (> or =30 kg/m(2)) were independent predictors of death.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that higher peritoneal transport is not a significant independent risk factor for either mortality or death-censored technique failure. The favorable outcome for high transporters in this study may be due to improved management of volume status by the increased use of APD and the use of icodextrin-based dialysis fluid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18178952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  17 in total

1.  Plasma volume, albumin, and fluid status in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Biju John; B Kay Tan; Stephen Dainty; Patrik Spanel; David Smith; Simon J Davies
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  The influence of initial peritoneal transport characteristics, inflammation, and high glucose exposure on prognosis for peritoneal membrane function.

Authors:  M José Fernández-Reyes; M Auxiliadora Bajo; Gloria Del Peso; Marta Ossorio; Raquel Díaz; Beatriz Carretero; Rafael Selgas
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Peritoneal albumin and protein losses do not predict outcome in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Olga Balafa; Nynke Halbesma; Dirk G Struijk; Friedo W Dekker; Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Predicting Risk in Peritoneal Dialysis: Is Membrane Biology Destiny?

Authors:  Maria Erika Ramirez; Joanne Bargman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  The importance of using peritoneal equlibration test for the peritoneal transport type characterization in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Snezana Uncanin; Senija Rasić; Damir Rebić; Jasminka Dzemidzić; Alma Muslimović; Begler Begović; Vedad Herenda
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.363

6.  Independent effects of systemic and peritoneal inflammation on peritoneal dialysis survival.

Authors:  Mark Lambie; James Chess; Kieron L Donovan; Yong Lim Kim; Jun Young Do; Hi Bahl Lee; Hyunjin Noh; Paul F Williams; Andrew J Williams; Sara Davison; Marc Dorval; Angela Summers; John D Williams; John Bankart; Simon J Davies; Nicholas Topley
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  High peritoneal transport status is not an independent risk factor for high mortality in patients treated with automated peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Tae Ik Chang; Jung Tak Park; Dong Hyung Lee; Ju Hyun Lee; Tae Hyun Yoo; Beom Seok Kim; Shin-Wook Kang; Ho Yung Lee; Kyu Hun Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Association of peritoneal dialysis clinic size with clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Laura C Plantinga; Nancy E Fink; Fredric O Finkelstein; Neil R Powe; Bernard G Jaar
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Peritoneal protein clearance and not peritoneal membrane transport status predicts survival in a contemporary cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey Perl; Kit Huckvale; Michelle Chellar; Biju John; Simon J Davies
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Peritoneal transport: getting more complicated.

Authors:  James G Heaf
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 5.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.