Literature DB >> 20433430

The importance of using peritoneal equlibration test for the peritoneal transport type characterization in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

Snezana Uncanin1, Senija Rasić, Damir Rebić, Jasminka Dzemidzić, Alma Muslimović, Begler Begović, Vedad Herenda.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the importance of the peritoneal equilibration test (PET) in evaluation of the peritoneal membrane transport status in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). The study included 30 adult continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients, 16 male and 14 female, mean age 61 +/- 16.5 years with a prescription of four exchanges of 2 litres (L) per day, who underwent peritoneal equilibration test (PET). Eleven of patients were diabetics. A modified PET was performed during a 4 hours dwell using 4.25% glucose dialysis solution. The dialysate/ plasma ratio of creatinine (D/P) at the end of the procedure, and the dialysate 240 min/ initial dialysate ratio of glucose (D/Do) were calculated and used as parameter of solute transport. With the test, categorization of patients was possible into high (H), high-average (HA), low average (LA), and low (L) transporters. In multivariate analysis age, gender, time on dialysis, comorbid diseases, diabetes mellitus (DM), serum albumin, were considered as independent factors influencing the PET. Among 30 patients 5 (16.7%) were classified as H transporters, 6 (20%) as HA, and 19 (63.3%) as LA. There were no patients in low category. Creatinine D/P at 4 hours was not different DM and non-DM patients. There were significant differences in gender, comorbid disease, serum albumin, D4/Do glucose and volume drained in 4 hours. The high transporter group had higher proportion of man (p<0.05), higher proportion of patients with comorbid diseases, lower serum albumin concentration (p<0.001), lower D4/Do glucose (p<0.001), and lower drained volume (p<0.001). The PET was en easy, inexpensive, reliable test to assess peritoneal transport type and it also provided information about peritoneal clearance of solutes and ultrafiltration. Peritoneal transport type classification was recognized not only as aid for prescription, but also as a prognostic index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20433430      PMCID: PMC5627712          DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2010.2645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci        ISSN: 1512-8601            Impact factor:   3.363


  10 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and management of ultrafiltration problems in peritoneal dialysis. International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis Ad Hoc Committee on Ultrafiltration Management in Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  S Mujais; K Nolph; R Gokal; P Blake; J Burkart; G Coles; Y Kawaguchi; H Kawanishi; S Korbet; R Krediet; B Lindholm; D Oreopoulos; B Rippe; R Selgas
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Peritoneal membrane transport: driving under the influence.

Authors:  Olivier Devuyst; Nicholas Topley
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Is high peritoneal transport rate an independent risk factor for CAPD mortality?

Authors:  A M Cueto-Manzano; R Correa-Rotter
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Inherent high peritoneal transport and ultrafiltration deficiency: their mid-term clinical relevance.

Authors:  María-José Fernández Reyes; María-Auxiliadora Bajo; Covadonga Hevía; Gloria Del Peso; Silvia Ros; Auxiliadora García de Miguel; Antonio Cirugeda; María-José Castro; José A Sánchez-Tomero; Rafael Selgas
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Analysis of the prevalence and causes of ultrafiltration failure during long-term peritoneal dialysis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Watske Smit; Natalie Schouten; Nicole van den Berg; Monique J Langedijk; Dirk G Struijk; Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  A positive effect of AII inhibitors on peritoneal membrane function in long-term PD patients.

Authors:  Inna Kolesnyk; Marlies Noordzij; Friedo W Dekker; Elisabeth W Boeschoten; Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.992

7.  High peritoneal permeability is not associated with higher mortality or technique failure in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Xiao Yang; Wei Fang; Joanne M Bargman; Dimitrios G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Increased peritoneal membrane transport is associated with decreased patient and technique survival for continuous peritoneal dialysis patients. The Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group.

Authors:  D N Churchill; K E Thorpe; K D Nolph; P R Keshaviah; D G Oreopoulos; D Pagé
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 9.  Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Elvia García-López; Juan J Carrero; Mohamed E Suliman; Bengt Lindholm; Peter Stenvinkel
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Effects of interleukin-6 T15A single nucleotide polymorphism on baseline peritoneal solute transport rate in incident peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Young-Hwan Hwang; Min-Jeong Son; Jaeseok Yang; Kiwon Kim; Wookyung Chung; Kwon-Wook Joo; Yonsu Kim; Curie Ahn; Kook-Hwan Oh
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.