Literature DB >> 18178653

Development of a physics-based force field for the scoring and refinement of protein models.

Liliana Wroblewska1, Anna Jagielska, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

The minimal requirements of a physics-based potential that can refine protein structures are the existence of a correlation between the energy with native similarity and the scoring of the native structure as the lowest in energy. To develop such a force field, the relative weights of the Amber ff03 all-atom potential supplemented by an explicit hydrogen-bond potential were adjusted by global optimization of energetic and structural criteria for a large set of protein decoys generated for a set of 58 nonhomologous proteins. The average correlation coefficient of the energy with TM-score significantly improved from 0.25 for the original ff03 potential to 0.65 for the optimized force field. The fraction of proteins for which the native structure had lowest energy increased from 0.22 to 0.90. Moreover, use of an explicit hydrogen-bond potential improves scoring performance of the force field. Promising preliminary results were obtained in applying the optimized potentials to refine protein decoys using only an energy criterion to choose the best decoy among sampled structures. For a set of seven proteins, 63% of the decoys improve, 18% get worse, and 19% are not changed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18178653      PMCID: PMC2275715          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.121947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  31 in total

1.  Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA.

Authors:  K T Simons; R Bonneau; I Ruczinski; D Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999

2.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials.

Authors:  Brian N Dominy; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-05-07       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.

Authors:  Anthony K Felts; Emilio Gallicchio; Anders Wallqvist; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-08-01

6.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Meng-Juei Hsieh; Ray Luo
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-08-15

8.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

9.  Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  17 in total

1.  Predicting flexible loop regions that interact with ligands: the challenge of accurate scoring.

Authors:  Matthew L Danielson; Markus A Lill
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-11-09

2.  Sub-AQUA: real-value quality assessment of protein structure models.

Authors:  Yifeng David Yang; Preston Spratt; Hao Chen; Changsoon Park; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 1.650

3.  Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; Alberto Pérez; Michael J Schnieders; Lan Hua; Matthew P Jacobson; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-08-30

4.  Use of decoys to optimize an all-atom force field including hydration.

Authors:  Yelena A Arnautova; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Protein model refinement using an optimized physics-based all-atom force field.

Authors:  Anna Jagielska; Liliana Wroblewska; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Selecting high quality protein structures from diverse conformational ensembles.

Authors:  Ashwin Subramani; Peter A DiMaggio; Christodoulos A Floudas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Symmetry-restrained molecular dynamics simulations improve homology models of potassium channels.

Authors:  Andriy Anishkin; Adina L Milac; H Robert Guy
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-03

8.  Assessment of the protein-structure refinement category in CASP8.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; Lan Hua; Michael J Schnieders; Vijay S Pande; Matthew P Jacobson; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

9.  Identifying native-like protein structures with scoring functions based on all-atom ECEPP force fields, implicit solvent models and structure relaxation.

Authors:  Yelena A Arnautova; Yury N Vorobjev; Jorge A Vila; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-10

10.  Splitting statistical potentials into meaningful scoring functions: testing the prediction of near-native structures from decoy conformations.

Authors:  Patrick Aloy; Baldo Oliva
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.