Literature DB >> 12112706

Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.

Anthony K Felts1, Emilio Gallicchio, Anders Wallqvist, Ronald M Levy.   

Abstract

Protein decoy data sets provide a benchmark for testing scoring functions designed for fold recognition and protein homology modeling problems. It is commonly believed that statistical potentials based on reduced atomic models are better able to discriminate native-like from misfolded decoys than scoring functions based on more detailed molecular mechanics models. Recent benchmark tests on small data sets, however, suggest otherwise. In this work, we report the results of extensive decoy detection tests using an effective free energy function based on the OPLS all-atom (OPLS-AA) force field and the Surface Generalized Born (SGB) model for the solvent electrostatic effects. The OPLS-AA/SGB effective free energy is used as a scoring function to detect native protein folds among a total of 48,832 decoys for 32 different proteins from Park and Levitt's 4-state-reduced, Levitt's local-minima, Baker's ROSETTA all-atom, and Skolnick's decoy sets. Solvent electrostatic effects are included through the Surface Generalized Born (SGB) model. All structures are locally minimized without restraints. From an analysis of the individual energy components of the OPLS-AA/SGB energy function for the native and the best-ranked decoy, it is determined that a balance of the terms of the potential is responsible for the minimized energies that most successfully distinguish the native from the misfolded conformations. Different combinations of individual energy terms provide less discrimination than the total energy. The results are consistent with observations that all-atom molecular potentials coupled with intermediate level solvent dielectric models are competitive with knowledge-based potentials for decoy detection and protein modeling problems such as fold recognition and homology modeling. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12112706     DOI: 10.1002/prot.10171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  34 in total

1.  Can correct protein models be identified?

Authors:  Björn Wallner; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Energy functions for protein design I: efficient and accurate continuum electrostatics and solvation.

Authors:  Navin Pokala; Tracy M Handel
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Mimicking the action of folding chaperones in molecular dynamics simulations: Application to the refinement of homology-based protein structures.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Alan E Mark
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Integrated Modeling Program, Applied Chemical Theory (IMPACT).

Authors:  Jay L Banks; Hege S Beard; Yixiang Cao; Art E Cho; Wolfgang Damm; Ramy Farid; Anthony K Felts; Thomas A Halgren; Daniel T Mainz; Jon R Maple; Robert Murphy; Dean M Philipp; Matthew P Repasky; Linda Y Zhang; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner; Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Decoys for docking.

Authors:  Alan P Graves; Ruth Brenk; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Conformational sampling with implicit solvent models: application to the PHF6 peptide in tau protein.

Authors:  Austin Huang; Collin M Stultz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Comparison between Generalized-Born and Poisson-Boltzmann methods in physics-based scoring functions for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Matthew C Lee; Rong Yang; Yong Duan
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 1.810

9.  Identification of correct regions in protein models using structural, alignment, and consensus information.

Authors:  Björn Wallner; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Local quality assessment in homology models using statistical potentials and support vector machines.

Authors:  Marc Fasnacht; Jiang Zhu; Barry Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.