Literature DB >> 18174009

Urine drug screening: practical guide for clinicians.

Karen E Moeller1, Kelly C Lee, Julie C Kissack.   

Abstract

Drug testing, commonly used in health care, workplace, and criminal settings, has become widespread during the past decade. Urine drug screens have been the most common method for analysis because of ease of sampling. The simplicity of use and access to rapid results have increased demand for and use of immunoassays; however, these assays are not perfect. False-positive results of immunoassays can lead to serious medical or social consequences if results are not confirmed by secondary analysis, such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The Department of Health and Human Services' guidelines for the workplace require testing for the following 5 substances: amphetamines, cannabinoids, cocaine, opiates, and phencyclidine. This article discusses potential false-positive results and false-negative results that occur with immunoassays of these substances and with alcohol, benzodiazepines, and tricyclic antidepressants. Other pitfalls, such as adulteration, substitution, and dilution of urine samples, are discussed. Pragmatic concepts summarized in this article should minimize the potential risks of misinterpreting urine drug screens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18174009     DOI: 10.4065/83.1.66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  98 in total

1.  21-year-old woman with palpitations and vomiting.

Authors:  Peter P Stanich; Paul S Mueller
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Sensitivity and specificity of urinary ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in liver disease patients.

Authors:  Scott H Stewart; David G Koch; Douglas M Burgess; Ira R Willner; Adrian Reuben
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Drug-induced acute psychosis in an adolescent first-time user of 4-HO-MET.

Authors:  Jakob Täljemark; Björn Axel Johansson
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.785

4.  Trends in laboratory test volumes for Medicare Part B reimbursements, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Shahram Shahangian; Todd D Alspach; J Rex Astles; Ajay Yesupriya; William K Dettwyler
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  False positive phencyclidine result on urine drug testing: a little known cause.

Authors:  Gabriella L Landy; Mukesh Kripalani
Journal:  BJPsych Bull       Date:  2015-02

6.  Buyer Beware: Pitfalls in Toxicology Laboratory Testing.

Authors:  D Adam Algren; Michael R Christian
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2015 May-Jun

Review 7.  Maternity Care for Pregnant Women with Opioid Use Disorder: A Review.

Authors:  Abigail H Rizk; Sara E Simonsen; Leissa Roberts; Lisa Taylor-Swanson; Jennifer Berkowicz Lemoine; Marcela Smid
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 8.  Opioid addiction and abuse in primary care practice: a comparison of methadone and buprenorphine as treatment options.

Authors:  Jean Bonhomme; Ruth S Shim; Richard Gooden; Dawn Tyus; George Rust
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  Hair drug testing results and self-reported drug use among primary care patients with moderate-risk illicit drug use.

Authors:  Jan Gryczynski; Robert P Schwartz; Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Kevin E O'Grady; Steven J Ondersma
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  The reliability and validity of drug users' self reports of amphetamine use among primarily heroin and cocaine users.

Authors:  Lucy E Napper; Dennis G Fisher; Mark E Johnson; Michele M Wood
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.