Literature DB >> 24932945

Hair drug testing results and self-reported drug use among primary care patients with moderate-risk illicit drug use.

Jan Gryczynski1, Robert P Schwartz2, Shannon Gwin Mitchell2, Kevin E O'Grady3, Steven J Ondersma4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study sought to examine the utility of hair testing as a research measure of drug use among individuals with moderate-risk drug use based on the internationally validated Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST).
METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis using baseline data from a randomized trial of brief intervention for drug misuse, in which 360 adults with moderate-risk drug use were recruited from two community clinics in New Mexico, USA. The current study compared self-reported drug use on the ASSIST with laboratory analysis of hair samples using a standard commercially available 5-panel test with assay screening and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) confirmation. Both self-report and hair testing covered a 3-month period.
RESULTS: Overall concordance between hair testing and self-report was 57.5% (marijuana), 86.5% (cocaine), 85.8% (amphetamines), and 74.3% (opioids). Specificity of hair testing at standard laboratory cut-offs exceeded 90% for all drugs, but sensitivity of hair testing relative to self-report was low, identifying only 52.3% (127/243) of self-disclosed marijuana users, 65.2% (30/46) of cocaine users, 24.2% (8/33) of amphetamine users, and 2.9% (2/68) of opioid users. Among participants who disclosed using marijuana or cocaine in the past 3 months, participants with a negative hair test tended to report lower-frequency use of those drugs (p<.001 for marijuana and cocaine).
CONCLUSIONS: Hair testing can be useful in studies with moderate-risk drug users, but the potential for under-identification of low-frequency use suggests that researchers should consider employing low detection cut-offs and using hair testing in conjunction with self-report.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brief intervention; Hair testing; Moderate-risk drug use; Primary care; Self-report

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24932945      PMCID: PMC4080811          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  30 in total

1.  Validity of drug use reporting in a high-risk community sample: a comparison of cocaine and heroin survey reports with hair tests.

Authors:  M Fendrich; T P Johnson; S Sudman; J S Wislar; V Spiehler
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Dose-related distribution of codeine, cocaine, and metabolites into human hair following controlled oral codeine and subcutaneous cocaine administration.

Authors:  Karl B Scheidweiler; Edward J Cone; Eric T Moolchan; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Predictors of disclosure of continued cocaine use.

Authors:  Katherine Tassiopoulos; Judith Bernstein; Timothy Heeren; Suzette Levenson; Ralph Hingson; Edward Bernstein
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  Validity of self-reported drug use in high risk populations: a meta-analytical review.

Authors:  S Magura; S Y Kang
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.164

5.  Clinical applications of hair testing for drugs of abuse--the Canadian experience.

Authors:  J Klein; T Karaskov; G Koren
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2000-01-10       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Validation of the World Health Organization Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): report of results from the Australian site.

Authors:  David Al Newcombe; Rachel E Humeniuk; Robert Ali
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2005-05

7.  Cannabinoid concentrations in hair from documented cannabis users.

Authors:  Marilyn A Huestis; Richard A Gustafson; Eric T Moolchan; Allan Barnes; James A Bourland; Stacy A Sweeney; Eugene F Hayes; Patrick M Carpenter; Michael L Smith
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Brief motivational intervention at a clinic visit reduces cocaine and heroin use.

Authors:  Judith Bernstein; Edward Bernstein; Katherine Tassiopoulos; Timothy Heeren; Suzette Levenson; Ralph Hingson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Computerized versus in-person brief intervention for drug misuse: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Robert P Schwartz; Jan Gryczynski; Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Arturo Gonzales; Ana Moseley; Thomas R Peterson; Steven J Ondersma; Kevin E O'Grady
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  Evaluation of the IDS One-Step ELISA kits for the detection of illicit drugs in hair.

Authors:  Marie-Laure Pujol; Vincent Cirimele; Pierre Julien Tritsch; Marion Villain; Pascal Kintz
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 2.395

View more
  16 in total

1.  The impact of non-concordant self-report of substance use in clinical trials research.

Authors:  C Brendan Clark; Cosmas M Zyambo; Ye Li; Karen L Cropsey
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Hair analysis and its concordance with self-report for drug users presenting in emergency department.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Neal Oden; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Michael P Bogenschutz
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-08-07       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  A comparison of the utility of urine- and hair testing in detecting self-reported drug use among young adult opioid users.

Authors:  Joseph J Palamar; Austin Le; Honoria Guarino; Pedro Mateu-Gelabert
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Validity of Self-reported Cannabis Use Among Pregnant Females in Northern California.

Authors:  Kelly C Young-Wolff; Varada Sarovar; Lue-Yen Tucker; Nancy Goler; Amy Conway; Constance Weisner; Mary Anne Armstrong; Stacey Alexeeff
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.702

5.  Prevalence of dyslipidemia and its association with opium consumption in the Rafsanjan cohort study.

Authors:  Zahra Jamali; Mojgan Noroozi Karimabad; Parvin Khalili; Tabandeh Sadeghi; Ahmadreza Sayadi; Faegheh Mohammadakbari Rostamabadi; Carlo La Vecchia; Ali Esmaeili-Nadimi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  What is the prevalence of drug use in the general population? Simulating underreported and unknown use for more accurate national estimates.

Authors:  Natalie S Levy; Joseph J Palamar; Stephen J Mooney; Charles M Cleland; Katherine M Keyes
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 6.996

7.  Accuracy of the Audio Computer Assisted Self Interview version of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ACASI ASSIST) for identifying unhealthy substance use and substance use disorders in primary care patients.

Authors:  Pritika C Kumar; Charles M Cleland; Marc N Gourevitch; John Rotrosen; Shiela Strauss; Linnea Russell; Jennifer McNeely
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Immediate Versus Delayed Computerized Brief Intervention for Illicit Drug Misuse.

Authors:  Jan Gryczynski; Kevin E O'Grady; Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Steven J Ondersma; Robert P Schwartz
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.702

9.  A randomized trial of computerized vs. in-person brief intervention for illicit drug use in primary care: outcomes through 12 months.

Authors:  Jan Gryczynski; Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Arturo Gonzales; Ana Moseley; Thomas R Peterson; Steven J Ondersma; Kevin E O'Grady; Robert P Schwartz
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2014-09-16

10.  Using mobile health technologies to test the association of cocaine use with sexual desire and risky sexual behaviors among people with and without HIV who use illicit stimulants.

Authors:  Yunan Xu; Sheri L Towe; Shakiera T Causey; Christina S Meade
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.