Literature DB >> 23738761

Trends in laboratory test volumes for Medicare Part B reimbursements, 2000-2010.

Shahram Shahangian1, Todd D Alspach, J Rex Astles, Ajay Yesupriya, William K Dettwyler.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Changes in reimbursements for clinical laboratory testing may help us assess the effect of various variables, such as testing recommendations, market forces, changes in testing technology, and changes in clinical or laboratory practices, and provide information that can influence health care and public health policy decisions. To date, however, there has been no report, to our knowledge, of longitudinal trends in national laboratory test use.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Medicare Part B-reimbursed volumes of selected laboratory tests per 10,000 enrollees from 2000 through 2010.
DESIGN: Laboratory test reimbursement volumes per 10,000 enrollees in Medicare Part B were obtained from the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (Baltimore, Maryland). The ratio of the most recent (2010) reimbursed test volume per 10,000 Medicare enrollees, divided by the oldest data (usually 2000) during this decade, called the volume ratio, was used to measure trends in test reimbursement. Laboratory tests with a reimbursement claim frequency of at least 10 per 10,000 Medicare enrollees in 2010 were selected, provided there was more than a 50% change in test reimbursement volume during the 2000-2010 decade. We combined the reimbursed test volumes for the few tests that were listed under more than one code in the Current Procedural Terminology (American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois). A 2-sided Poisson regression, adjusted for potential overdispersion, was used to determine P values for the trend; trends were considered significant at P < .05.
RESULTS: Tests with the greatest decrease in reimbursement volumes were electrolytes, digoxin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and lithium, with volume ratios ranging from 0.27 to 0.64 (P < .001). Tests with the greatest increase in reimbursement volumes were meprobamate, opiates, methadone, phencyclidine, amphetamines, cocaine, and vitamin D, with volume ratios ranging from 83 to 1510 (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Although reimbursement volumes increased for most of the selected tests, other tests exhibited statistically significant downward trends in annual reimbursement volumes. The observed changes in reimbursement volumes may be explained by disease prevalence and severity, patterns of drug use, clinical or laboratory practices, and testing recommendations and guidelines, among others. These data may be useful to policy makers, health systems researchers, laboratory directors, and industry scientists to understand, address, and anticipate trends in laboratory testing in the Medicare population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23738761      PMCID: PMC4698806          DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0149-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  90 in total

1.  National Inventory of Clinical Laboratory Testing Services (NICLTS). Development and test distribution for 1996.

Authors:  S J Steindel; W J Rauch; M K Simon; J Handsfield
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Reducing the use of coagulation test panels.

Authors:  Timothy K Amukele; Geoffrey S Baird; Wayne L Chandler
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.276

Review 3.  Serum thyroid-stimulating hormone measurement for assessment of thyroid function and disease.

Authors:  D S Ross
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.741

4.  Trends in antiepileptic drug utilisation in UK primary care 1993-2008: cohort study using the General Practice Research Database.

Authors:  Jennifer M Nicholas; Leone Ridsdale; Mark P Richardson; Mark Ashworth; Martin C Gulliford
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 5.  Case finding and screening strategies for thyroid dysfunction.

Authors:  Jim R Stockigt
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 6.  Human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid testing in developed countries.

Authors:  Neerja Bhatla; Shilpa Singla; Divya Awasthi
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 5.237

Review 7.  Cervical cancer screening from Pap smear to human papillomavirus DNA testing.

Authors:  X W Jin; H Xu
Journal:  Compr Ther       Date:  2001

Review 8.  Newborn screening strategies for congenital hypothyroidism: an update.

Authors:  Stephen H LaFranchi
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 9.  Thyroid disease: a review for primary care.

Authors:  J Larson; E H Anderson; M Koslawy
Journal:  J Am Acad Nurse Pract       Date:  2000-06

Review 10.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Eileen M Burd
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 26.132

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Dietary Vitamin D Intake for the Elderly Population: Update on the Recommended Dietary Allowance for Vitamin D.

Authors:  Lynette M Smith; J Christopher Gallagher
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.741

2.  The vitamin D status of the US population from 1988 to 2010 using standardized serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D shows recent modest increases.

Authors:  Rosemary L Schleicher; Maya R Sternberg; David A Lacher; Christopher T Sempos; Anne C Looker; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu; Elizabeth A Yetley; Madhulika Chaudhary-Webb; Khin L Maw; Christine M Pfeiffer; Clifford L Johnson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Trends in Dietary Supplement Use Among US Adults From 1999-2012.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Kantor; Colin D Rehm; Mengmeng Du; Emily White; Edward L Giovannucci
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  The laboratory test utilization management toolbox.

Authors:  Geoffrey Baird
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 5.  Clinical Management of Low Vitamin D: A Scoping Review of Physicians' Practices.

Authors:  Michelle Rockwell; Vivica Kraak; Matthew Hulver; John Epling
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  High-dose versus low-dose ergocalciferol for correcting hypovitaminosis D after fragility hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Atthakorn Jarusriwanna; Suchat Phusunti; Pojchong Chotiyarnwong; Aasis Unnanuntana
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.921

7.  Tachycardia in hyperthyroidism: Not so common.

Authors:  Muriel Tania Go; Amrutha Mary George; Bettina Tahsin; Leon Fogelfeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Magnesium deficit ? overlooked cause of low vitamin D status?

Authors:  Armin Zittermann
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 9.  Development of Vitamin D Toxicity from Overcorrection of Vitamin D Deficiency: A Review of Case Reports.

Authors:  Kornelia Galior; Stefan Grebe; Ravinder Singh
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Vitamin D prescribing in children in UK primary care practices: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Mandy Wan; Laura J Horsfall; Emre Basatemur; Jignesh Prakash Patel; Rukshana Shroff; Greta Rait
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.