Literature DB >> 18172838

Assessment of programs for ligand binding affinity prediction.

Ryangguk Kim1, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

The prediction of the binding free energy between a ligand and a protein is an important component in the virtual screening and lead optimization of ligands for drug discovery. To determine the quality of current binding free energy estimation programs, we examined FlexX, X-Score, AutoDock, and BLEEP for their performance in binding free energy prediction in various situations including cocrystallized complex structures, cross docking of ligands to their non-cocrystallized receptors, docking of thermally unfolded receptor decoys to their ligands, and complex structures with "randomized" ligand decoys. In no case was there a satisfactory correlation between the experimental and estimated binding free energies over all the datasets tested. Meanwhile, a strong correlation between ligand molecular weight-binding affinity correlation and experimental predicted binding affinity correlation was found. Sometimes the programs also correctly ranked ligands' binding affinities even though native interactions between the ligands and their receptors were essentially lost because of receptor deformation or ligand randomization, and the programs could not decisively discriminate randomized ligand decoys from their native ligands; this suggested that the tested programs miss important components for the accurate capture of specific ligand binding interactions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18172838      PMCID: PMC2702145          DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  43 in total

1.  Docking into knowledge-based potential fields: a comparative evaluation of DrugScore.

Authors:  Christoph A Sotriffer; Holger Gohlke; Gerhard Klebe
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-05-09       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases.

Authors:  T J Ewing; S Makino; A G Skillman; I D Kuntz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome.

Authors:  Robert H Waterston; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Ewan Birney; Jane Rogers; Josep F Abril; Pankaj Agarwal; Richa Agarwala; Rachel Ainscough; Marina Alexandersson; Peter An; Stylianos E Antonarakis; John Attwood; Robert Baertsch; Jonathon Bailey; Karen Barlow; Stephan Beck; Eric Berry; Bruce Birren; Toby Bloom; Peer Bork; Marc Botcherby; Nicolas Bray; Michael R Brent; Daniel G Brown; Stephen D Brown; Carol Bult; John Burton; Jonathan Butler; Robert D Campbell; Piero Carninci; Simon Cawley; Francesca Chiaromonte; Asif T Chinwalla; Deanna M Church; Michele Clamp; Christopher Clee; Francis S Collins; Lisa L Cook; Richard R Copley; Alan Coulson; Olivier Couronne; James Cuff; Val Curwen; Tim Cutts; Mark Daly; Robert David; Joy Davies; Kimberly D Delehaunty; Justin Deri; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Colin Dewey; Nicholas J Dickens; Mark Diekhans; Sheila Dodge; Inna Dubchak; Diane M Dunn; Sean R Eddy; Laura Elnitski; Richard D Emes; Pallavi Eswara; Eduardo Eyras; Adam Felsenfeld; Ginger A Fewell; Paul Flicek; Karen Foley; Wayne N Frankel; Lucinda A Fulton; Robert S Fulton; Terrence S Furey; Diane Gage; Richard A Gibbs; Gustavo Glusman; Sante Gnerre; Nick Goldman; Leo Goodstadt; Darren Grafham; Tina A Graves; Eric D Green; Simon Gregory; Roderic Guigó; Mark Guyer; Ross C Hardison; David Haussler; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; LaDeana W Hillier; Angela Hinrichs; Wratko Hlavina; Timothy Holzer; Fan Hsu; Axin Hua; Tim Hubbard; Adrienne Hunt; Ian Jackson; David B Jaffe; L Steven Johnson; Matthew Jones; Thomas A Jones; Ann Joy; Michael Kamal; Elinor K Karlsson; Donna Karolchik; Arkadiusz Kasprzyk; Jun Kawai; Evan Keibler; Cristyn Kells; W James Kent; Andrew Kirby; Diana L Kolbe; Ian Korf; Raju S Kucherlapati; Edward J Kulbokas; David Kulp; Tom Landers; J P Leger; Steven Leonard; Ivica Letunic; Rosie Levine; Jia Li; Ming Li; Christine Lloyd; Susan Lucas; Bin Ma; Donna R Maglott; Elaine R Mardis; Lucy Matthews; Evan Mauceli; John H Mayer; Megan McCarthy; W Richard McCombie; Stuart McLaren; Kirsten McLay; John D McPherson; Jim Meldrim; Beverley Meredith; Jill P Mesirov; Webb Miller; Tracie L Miner; Emmanuel Mongin; Kate T Montgomery; Michael Morgan; Richard Mott; James C Mullikin; Donna M Muzny; William E Nash; Joanne O Nelson; Michael N Nhan; Robert Nicol; Zemin Ning; Chad Nusbaum; Michael J O'Connor; Yasushi Okazaki; Karen Oliver; Emma Overton-Larty; Lior Pachter; Genís Parra; Kymberlie H Pepin; Jane Peterson; Pavel Pevzner; Robert Plumb; Craig S Pohl; Alex Poliakov; Tracy C Ponce; Chris P Ponting; Simon Potter; Michael Quail; Alexandre Reymond; Bruce A Roe; Krishna M Roskin; Edward M Rubin; Alistair G Rust; Ralph Santos; Victor Sapojnikov; Brian Schultz; Jörg Schultz; Matthias S Schwartz; Scott Schwartz; Carol Scott; Steven Seaman; Steve Searle; Ted Sharpe; Andrew Sheridan; Ratna Shownkeen; Sarah Sims; Jonathan B Singer; Guy Slater; Arian Smit; Douglas R Smith; Brian Spencer; Arne Stabenau; Nicole Stange-Thomann; Charles Sugnet; Mikita Suyama; Glenn Tesler; Johanna Thompson; David Torrents; Evanne Trevaskis; John Tromp; Catherine Ucla; Abel Ureta-Vidal; Jade P Vinson; Andrew C Von Niederhausern; Claire M Wade; Melanie Wall; Ryan J Weber; Robert B Weiss; Michael C Wendl; Anthony P West; Kris Wetterstrand; Raymond Wheeler; Simon Whelan; Jamey Wierzbowski; David Willey; Sophie Williams; Richard K Wilson; Eitan Winter; Kim C Worley; Dudley Wyman; Shan Yang; Shiaw-Pyng Yang; Evgeny M Zdobnov; Michael C Zody; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  L/D Protein Ligand Database (PLD): additional understanding of the nature and specificity of protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Dushyanthan Puvanendrampillai; John B O Mitchell
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Luhua Lai; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Yipin Lu; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-06-05       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols. 2. Examination of docked ligand orientation sampling methodology: mapping a pharmacophore for success.

Authors:  Andrew C Good; Daniel L Cheney; Doree F Sitkoff; John S Tokarski; Terry R Stouch; Donna A Bassolino; Stanley R Krystek; Yi Li; Jonathan S Mason; Timothy D J Perkins
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.518

8.  Extensive mosaic structure revealed by the complete genome sequence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R A Welch; V Burland; G Plunkett; P Redford; P Roesch; D Rasko; E L Buckles; S-R Liou; A Boutin; J Hackett; D Stroud; G F Mayhew; D J Rose; S Zhou; D C Schwartz; N T Perna; H L T Mobley; M S Donnenberg; F R Blattner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Ligand-induced conformational changes: improved predictions of ligand binding conformations and affinities.

Authors:  Thomas M Frimurer; Günther H Peters; Lars F Iversen; Henrik S Andersen; Niels Peter H Møller; Ole H Olsen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Improved prediction of HIV-1 protease-inhibitor binding energies by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Ekachai Jenwitheesuk; Ram Samudrala
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2003-04-01
View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Tuffery; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Construction and test of ligand decoy sets using MDock: community structure-activity resource benchmarks for binding mode prediction.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 3.  FINDSITE: a combined evolution/structure-based approach to protein function prediction.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Using protein-ligand docking to assess the chemical tractability of inhibiting a protein target.

Authors:  Richard A Ward
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Accounting for ligand conformational restriction in calculations of protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Cen Gao; Min-Sun Park; Harry A Stern
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Receptor-ligand molecular docking.

Authors:  Isabella A Guedes; Camila S de Magalhães; Laurent E Dardenne
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2013-12-21

7.  Implicit ligand theory: rigorous binding free energies and thermodynamic expectations from molecular docking.

Authors:  David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Absolute Binding Free Energies between T4 Lysozyme and 141 Small Molecules: Calculations Based on Multiple Rigid Receptor Configurations.

Authors:  Bing Xie; Trung Hai Nguyen; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.

Authors:  Symon Gathiaka; Shuai Liu; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Jeanne A Stuckey; You Na Kang; Jim Delproposto; Ginger Kubish; James B Dunbar; Heather A Carlson; Stephen K Burley; W Patrick Walters; Rommie E Amaro; Victoria A Feher; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Characterization of small molecule binding. I. Accurate identification of strong inhibitors in virtual screening.

Authors:  Bo Ding; Jian Wang; Nan Li; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.