Literature DB >> 22979849

Implicit ligand theory: rigorous binding free energies and thermodynamic expectations from molecular docking.

David D L Minh1.   

Abstract

A rigorous formalism for estimating noncovalent binding free energies and thermodynamic expectations from calculations in which receptor configurations are sampled independently from the ligand is derived. Due to this separation, receptor configurations only need to be sampled once, facilitating the use of binding free energy calculations in virtual screening. Demonstrative calculations on a host-guest system yield good agreement with previous free energy calculations and isothermal titration calorimetry measurements. Implicit ligand theory provides guidance on how to improve existing molecular docking algorithms and insight into the concepts of induced fit and conformational selection in noncovalent macromolecular recognition.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22979849      PMCID: PMC3460968          DOI: 10.1063/1.4751284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  45 in total

1.  Application of the frozen atom approximation to the GB/SA continuum model for solvation free energy.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Jörg Weiser; Peter Shenkin; István Kolossváry; W Clark Still
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-01-30       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Discovery of a novel binding trench in HIV integrase.

Authors:  Julie R Schames; Richard H Henchman; Jay S Siegel; Christoph A Sotriffer; Haihong Ni; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 3.  Virtual screening of chemical libraries.

Authors:  Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go.

Authors:  N Moitessier; P Englebienne; D Lee; J Lawandi; C R Corbeil
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing.

Authors:  Alan P Graves; Devleena M Shivakumar; Sarah E Boyce; Matthew P Jacobson; David A Case; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Induced-fit or preexisting equilibrium dynamics? Lessons from protein crystallography and MD simulations on acetylcholinesterase and implications for structure-based drug design.

Authors:  Yechun Xu; Jacques Ph Colletier; Hualiang Jiang; Israel Silman; Joel L Sussman; Martin Weik
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Use of MM-PBSA in reproducing the binding free energies to HIV-1 RT of TIBO derivatives and predicting the binding mode to HIV-1 RT of efavirenz by docking and MM-PBSA.

Authors:  J Wang; P Morin; W Wang; P A Kollman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  The Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for the Estimation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Mauro Lapelosa; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Systematic exploitation of multiple receptor conformations for virtual ligand screening.

Authors:  Giovanni Bottegoni; Walter Rocchia; Manuel Rueda; Ruben Abagyan; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Induced fit or conformational selection? The role of the semi-closed state in the maltose binding protein.

Authors:  Denis Bucher; Barry J Grant; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  11 in total

1.  Systematic Testing of Belief-Propagation Estimates for Absolute Free Energies in Atomistic Peptides and Proteins.

Authors:  Rory M Donovan-Maiye; Christopher J Langmead; Daniel M Zuckerman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Power transformations improve interpolation of grids for molecular mechanics interaction energies.

Authors:  David D L Minh
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Implicit ligand theory for relative binding free energies.

Authors:  Trung Hai Nguyen; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Using the fast fourier transform in binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Trung Hai Nguyen; Huan-Xiang Zhou; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Alchemical Grid Dock (AlGDock): Binding Free Energy Calculations between Flexible Ligands and Rigid Receptors.

Authors:  David D L Minh
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Efficiency of Stratification for Ensemble Docking Using Reduced Ensembles.

Authors:  Bing Xie; John D Clark; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Implicit ligand theory for relative binding free energies: II. An estimator based on control variates.

Authors:  Trung Hai Nguyen; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Phys Commun       Date:  2020-11-26

8.  Absolute Binding Free Energies between T4 Lysozyme and 141 Small Molecules: Calculations Based on Multiple Rigid Receptor Configurations.

Authors:  Bing Xie; Trung Hai Nguyen; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Constrained Molecular Dynamics as Gibbs Sampling.

Authors:  Laurentiu Spiridon; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Alchemical Grid Dock (AlGDock) calculations in the D3R Grand Challenge 3 : Binding free energies between flexible ligands and rigid receptors.

Authors:  Bing Xie; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.