Literature DB >> 18166203

Voluntary and involuntary attention affect face discrimination differently.

Michael Esterman1, William Prinzmetal, Joseph DeGutis, Ayelet Landau, Eliot Hazeltine, Timothy Verstynen, Lynn Robertson.   

Abstract

Do voluntary (endogenous) and involuntary (exogenous) attention have the same perceptual consequences? Here we used fMRI to examine activity in the fusiform face area (FFA--a region in ventral visual cortex responsive to faces) and frontal-parietal areas (dorsal regions involved in spatial attention) under voluntary and involuntary spatial cueing conditions. The trial and stimulus parameters were identical for both cueing conditions. However, the cue predicted the location of an upcoming target face in the voluntary condition but was nonpredictive in the involuntary condition. The predictable cue condition led to increased activity in the FFA compared to the nonpredictable cue condition. These results show that voluntary attention leads to more activity in areas of the brain associated with face processing than involuntary attention, and they are consistent with differential behavioral effects of attention on recognition-related processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18166203      PMCID: PMC2277324          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  37 in total

Review 1.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function.

Authors:  E K Miller; J D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; G R Mangun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement.

Authors:  M Carrasco; C Penpeci-Talgar; M Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  E Leslie Cameron; Joanna C Tai; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Testing cognitive models of visual attention with fMRI and MEG.

Authors:  P Downing; J Liu; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising color singleton in visual search.

Authors:  Gernot Horstmann
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-11

8.  Endogenous and exogenous attention shifts are mediated by the same large-scale neural network.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Dirk J Heslenfeld; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Spatial uncertainty explains exogenous and endogenous attentional cuing effects in visual signal detection.

Authors:  Ian C Gould; Bradley J Wolfgang; Philip L Smith
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Neural networks underlying endogenous and exogenous visual-spatial orienting.

Authors:  Andrew R Mayer; Jill M Dorflinger; Stephen M Rao; Michael Seidenberg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  7 in total

1.  Contingent capture and inhibition of return: a comparison of mechanisms.

Authors:  William Prinzmetal; Jordan A Taylor; Loretta Barry Myers; Jacqueline Nguyen-Espino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cholinergic enhancement increases the effects of voluntary attention but does not affect involuntary attention.

Authors:  Ariel Rokem; Ayelet N Landau; Dave Garg; William Prinzmetal; Michael A Silver
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Voluntary and involuntary attention vary as a function of impulsivity.

Authors:  Ayelet N Landau; Deena Elwan; Sarah Holtz; William Prinzmetal
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

4.  No effect of spatial attention on the processing of a motion ensemble: Evidence from Posner cueing.

Authors:  Louisa A Talipski; Stephanie C Goodhew; Mark Edwards
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Investigating the Characteristics of Covert Unilateral Spatial Neglect Using the Modified Posner Task: A Single-subject Design Study.

Authors:  Shinpei Osaki; Kazu Amimoto; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Junpei Tanabe; Nao Yoshihiro
Journal:  Prog Rehabil Med       Date:  2021-03-06

6.  Differential impact of endogenous and exogenous attention on activity in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Elisha P Merriam; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Spatial and temporal attention modulate the early stages of face processing: behavioural evidence from a reaching paradigm.

Authors:  Genevieve L Quek; Matthew Finkbeiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.