Literature DB >> 11566315

Testing cognitive models of visual attention with fMRI and MEG.

P Downing1, J Liu, N Kanwisher.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging techniques can be used not only to identify the neural substrates of attention, but also to test cognitive theories of attention. Here we consider four classic questions in the psychology of visual attention: (i) Are some 'special' classes of stimuli (e.g. faces) immune to attentional modulation?; (ii) What are the information units on which attention operates?; (iii) How early in stimulus processing are attentional effects observed?; and (iv) Are common mechanisms involved in different modes of attentional selection (e.g. spatial and non-spatial selection)? We describe studies from our laboratory that illustrate the ways in which fMRI and MEG can provide key evidence in answering these questions. A central methodological theme in many of our fMRI studies is the use of analyses in which the activity in certain functionally-defined regions of interest (ROIs) is used to test specific cognitive hypotheses. An analogous sensor-of-interest (SOI) approach is applied to MEG. Our results include: evidence for the modulation of face representations by attention; confirmation of the independent contributions of object-based and location-based selection; evidence for modulation of face representations by non-spatial selection within the first 170 ms of processing; and implication of the intraparietal sulcus in functions general to spatial and non-spatial visual selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11566315     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00121-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  20 in total

1.  Working memory templates are maintained as feature-specific perceptual codes.

Authors:  Kartik K Sreenivasan; Deepak Sambhara; Amishi P Jha
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Perception and action selection dissociate human ventral and dorsal cortex.

Authors:  Akiko Ikkai; Trenton A Jerde; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Within-subject reproducibility of category-specific visual activation with functional MRI.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Paul E Downing
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Real-time fMRI using brain-state classification.

Authors:  Stephen M LaConte; Scott J Peltier; Xiaoping P Hu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Dissociation of face-selective cortical responses by attention.

Authors:  Maura L Furey; Topi Tanskanen; Michael S Beauchamp; Sari Avikainen; Kimmo Uutela; Riitta Hari; James V Haxby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Neuroimaging evidence for object model verification theory: Role of prefrontal control in visual object categorization.

Authors:  Giorgio Ganis; Haline E Schendan; Stephen M Kosslyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Individual differences in multiple types of shifting attention.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; John Jonides; Edward E Smith
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12

8.  Change detection related to peripheral facial expression: an electroencephalography study.

Authors:  Barbara Khittl; Herbert Bauer; Peter Walla
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Gating by induced Α-Γ asynchrony in selective attention.

Authors:  David Pascucci; Alexis Hervais-Adelman; Gijs Plomp
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  Exploring visual-spatial working memory: a critical review of concepts and models.

Authors:  J McAfoose; B T Baune
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 7.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.