Literature DB >> 15488402

Neural networks underlying endogenous and exogenous visual-spatial orienting.

Andrew R Mayer1, Jill M Dorflinger, Stephen M Rao, Michael Seidenberg.   

Abstract

The orienting of visual-spatial attention is fundamental to most organisms and is controlled through external (exogenous) or internal (endogenous) processes. Exogenous orienting is considered to be reflexive and automatic, whereas endogenous orienting refers to the purposeful allocation of attentional resources to a predetermined location in space. Although behavioral, electrophysiological and lesion research in both primates and humans suggests that separate neural systems control these different modes of orienting, previous human neuroimaging studies have largely reported common neuronal substrates. Therefore, event-related FMRI (ER-FMRI) was used to independently examine different components of the orienting response including endogenous facilitation, exogenous facilitation and inhibition of return (IOR). In contrast to previous studies, endogenous versus exogenous facilitation resulted in widespread cortical activation including bilateral temporoparietal junction, bilateral superior temporal gyrus, right middle temporal gyrus, right frontal eye field and left intraparietal sulcus. Conversely, IOR compared to endogenous facilitation resulted in only a single focus of activation in the left superior temporal gyrus. These findings suggest that endogenous orienting activates a large cortical network to achieve internally generated shifts of attentional resources versus the automatic orienting that occurs with exogenous cues. However, similar networks may mediate endogenous orienting and IOR. The activation of the temporoparietal junction suggests that it is involved in more effortful processes, such as endogenous orienting, as well as in attentional reorienting and locating targets. Current results are discussed in terms of the functional development of the visual-spatial attentional system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15488402     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  54 in total

1.  A unique role of endogenous visual-spatial attention in rapid processing of multiple targets.

Authors:  Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; German Palafox; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  An FMRI study of auditory orienting and inhibition of return in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Ronald A Yeo; Amanda Pena; Josef M Ling; Stefan Klimaj; Richard Campbell; David Doezema; Andrew R Mayer
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  The right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Sarah C Krall; Lukas J Volz; Eileen Oberwelland; Christian Grefkes; Gereon R Fink; Kerstin Konrad
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  EALab (Eye Activity Lab): a MATLAB Toolbox for Variable Extraction, Multivariate Analysis and Classification of Eye-Movement Data.

Authors:  Javier Andreu-Perez; Celine Solnais; Kumuthan Sriskandarajah
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2016-01

5.  Cognitive function, P3a/P3b brain potentials, and cortical thickness in aging.

Authors:  Anders M Fjell; Kristine B Walhovd; Bruce Fischl; Ivar Reinvang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Covert orienting of attention and overt eye movements activate identical brain regions.

Authors:  Bianca de Haan; Paul S Morgan; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  FMRI correlates of visuo-spatial reorienting investigated with an attention shifting double-cue paradigm.

Authors:  Elena Natale; Carlo Alberto Marzi; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Saccades and reaches, behaving differently.

Authors:  Bonnie M Lawrence; Andrew L Gardella
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Neuronal modulation of auditory attention by informative and uninformative spatial cues.

Authors:  Andrew R Mayer; Alexandre R Franco; Deborah L Harrington
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Attentional control during the transient updating of cue information.

Authors:  Luiz Pessoa; Andrew Rossi; Shruti Japee; Robert Desimone; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.