BACKGROUND: Angiographic assessment of left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis is often difficult and unreliable. To date, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is used to determine the significance of lesions in patients with LMCA stenosis of uncertain significance. We aimed to prospectively show the ability of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to assess LMCA luminal and plaque dimensions, and to characterize atherosclerotic plaque, as compared to IVUS and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), in patients with angiographically uncertain LMCA stenosis. METHODS: Twenty patients, with angiographically uncertain LMCA stenosis, underwent coronary evaluation with IVUS, QCA and 16-slice MDCT. Minimal lumen diameter (MLD), minimal lumen area (MLA), lumen area stenosis (LAS) and plaque burden (PB) were assessed. RESULTS: The MLD (median [interquartile range]) was 3.2 mm (2.5-3.7) by IVUS, 2.8 mm (2.3-3.3) by QCA (r=0.52, P<0.05), and 2.8 mm (2.5-3.8) by MDCT (r=0.77, P<0.01). MDCT estimated MLA as 10.7 mm(2) (7.1-12.6) Vs. 9.9 mm(2) (6.5-13.5) by IVUS (r=0.93, P<0.01). Very high correlations were observed between MDCT and IVUS in assessing LAS (mean +/- SD) (25.8+/-19.1% and 29.0+/-24.9% respectively, r=0.83, P<0.01), and PB (49.2+/-15.8% and 49.2+/-19.7% respectively, r=0.94, P<0.01). MDCT assigned plaque as being non-calcified with a sensitivity of 100%, while calcified plaques with a sensitivity of 75%. CONCLUSION: A high degree of correlation was found between MDCT and IVUS regarding the assessment of minimal lumen diameter and area, lumen area stenosis and plaque burden as well as plaque characterization in patients with angiographically borderline LMCA stenosis. Therefore, in patients selected for non-invasive coronary tree evaluation, MDCT may provide a valuable tool for the assessment, decision-making and follow-up of patients with uncertain LMCA disease.
BACKGROUND: Angiographic assessment of left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis is often difficult and unreliable. To date, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is used to determine the significance of lesions in patients with LMCA stenosis of uncertain significance. We aimed to prospectively show the ability of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to assess LMCA luminal and plaque dimensions, and to characterize atherosclerotic plaque, as compared to IVUS and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), in patients with angiographically uncertain LMCA stenosis. METHODS: Twenty patients, with angiographically uncertain LMCA stenosis, underwent coronary evaluation with IVUS, QCA and 16-slice MDCT. Minimal lumen diameter (MLD), minimal lumen area (MLA), lumen area stenosis (LAS) and plaque burden (PB) were assessed. RESULTS: The MLD (median [interquartile range]) was 3.2 mm (2.5-3.7) by IVUS, 2.8 mm (2.3-3.3) by QCA (r=0.52, P<0.05), and 2.8 mm (2.5-3.8) by MDCT (r=0.77, P<0.01). MDCT estimated MLA as 10.7 mm(2) (7.1-12.6) Vs. 9.9 mm(2) (6.5-13.5) by IVUS (r=0.93, P<0.01). Very high correlations were observed between MDCT and IVUS in assessing LAS (mean +/- SD) (25.8+/-19.1% and 29.0+/-24.9% respectively, r=0.83, P<0.01), and PB (49.2+/-15.8% and 49.2+/-19.7% respectively, r=0.94, P<0.01). MDCT assigned plaque as being non-calcified with a sensitivity of 100%, while calcified plaques with a sensitivity of 75%. CONCLUSION: A high degree of correlation was found between MDCT and IVUS regarding the assessment of minimal lumen diameter and area, lumen area stenosis and plaque burden as well as plaque characterization in patients with angiographically borderline LMCA stenosis. Therefore, in patients selected for non-invasive coronary tree evaluation, MDCT may provide a valuable tool for the assessment, decision-making and follow-up of patients with uncertain LMCA disease.
Authors: G S Mintz; S E Nissen; W D Anderson; S R Bailey; R Erbel; P J Fitzgerald; F J Pinto; K Rosenfield; R J Siegel; E M Tuzcu; P G Yock Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Alexander W Leber; Andreas Knez; Alexander Becker; Christoph Becker; Maximilian Reiser; Gerhard Steinbeck; Peter Boekstegers Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Amir-Ali Fassa; Kenji Wagatsuma; Stuart T Higano; Verghese Mathew; Gregory W Barsness; Ryan J Lennon; David R Holmes; Amir Lerman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-01-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: A Cameron; H G Kemp; L D Fisher; A Gosselin; M P Judkins; J W Kennedy; J Lesperance; J G Mudd; T J Ryan; J F Silverman; F Tristani; R E Vlietstra; L F Wexler Journal: Circulation Date: 1983-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: F D Loop; B W Lytle; D M Cosgrove; W C Sheldon; M Irarrazaval; P C Taylor; L K Groves; A D Pichard Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1979-08 Impact factor: 2.778