Literature DB >> 22562285

In-stent area stenosis on 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography: optimal cutoff value for minimum lumen cross-sectional area of coronary stents compared with intravascular ultrasound.

Woocheol Kwon1, Jiyoun Choi, Jang-Young Kim, Seong-Yoon Kim, Junghan Yoon, Kyoung-Hoon Choe, Seung Hwan Lee, Sung Gyun Ahn.   

Abstract

We aimed to prospectively assess the optimal cutoff value for a minimum lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) on a 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) compared with an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). In 39 patients with 43 stents, the minimum lumen diameter, stent diameter, diameter stenosis, minimum lumen CSA, stent CSA, and area stenosis at the narrowest point were measured independently on 64-slice MDCT and IVUS images. For the assessment of diameter and CSA, 64-slice MDCT showed good correlations with IVUS (r = 0.82 for minimum lumen diameter, r = 0.66 for stent diameter, r = 0.79 for minimum lumen CSA, and r = 0.75 for stent CSA, respectively, P < 0.0001). For the assessment of diameter and area stenoses, a 64-slice MDCT showed good correlations with IVUS (r = 0.89 and 0.91, respectively, P < 0.0001). The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value to detect in-stent area restenosis (≥ 50 % area stenosis) of a 64-slice MDCT were 77, 100, 100, and 91 %, respectively. The cutoff value of a 64-slice MDCT, determined by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, was 5.0 mm(2) with 76.5 % sensitivity and 92.3 % specificity for significant in-stent area restenosis; the area under the ROC curve was 0.902 (P < 0.0001). A good correlation was found between a 64-slice MDCT and the IVUS, regarding the assessment of diameter and area stenoses of coronary stents in selected patients implanted with stents of more than 3 mm in diameter. Optimal cutoff value for the minimum lumen CSA of coronary stents on the 64-slice MDCT is 5 mm(2) to predict a CSA of 4 mm(2) on IVUS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22562285     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0057-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  22 in total

Review 1.  American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  G S Mintz; S E Nissen; W D Anderson; S R Bailey; R Erbel; P J Fitzgerald; F J Pinto; K Rosenfield; R J Siegel; E M Tuzcu; P G Yock
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Accuracy of density measurements within plaques located in artificial coronary arteries by X-ray multislice CT: results of a phantom study.

Authors:  S Schroeder; T Flohr; A F Kopp; C Meisner; A Kuettner; C Herdeg; A Baumbach; B Ohnesorge
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 3.  Intravascular ultrasound: a histological study of vessels during life. The new 'gold standard' for vascular imaging.

Authors:  B F Waller; C A Pinkerton; J D Slack
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Daniele Andreini; Gianluca Pontone; Antonio L Bartorelli; Daniela Trabattoni; Saima Mushtaq; Erika Bertella; Andrea Annoni; Alberto Formenti; Sarah Cortinovis; Piero Montorsi; Fabrizio Veglia; Giovanni Ballerini; Mauro Pepi
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector-row CT for detection of in-stent restenosis vs detection of stenosis in nonstented coronary arteries.

Authors:  Joelle M Kefer; Emmanuel Coche; Jean-Louis J Vanoverschelde; Bernhard L Gerber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Carlos A G Van Mieghem; Filippo Cademartiri; Nico R Mollet; Patrizia Malagutti; Marco Valgimigli; Willem B Meijboom; Francesca Pugliese; Eugene P McFadden; Jurgen Ligthart; Giuseppe Runza; Nico Bruining; Pieter C Smits; Evelyn Regar; Willem J van der Giessen; Georgios Sianos; Ron van Domburg; Peter de Jaegere; Gabriel P Krestin; Patrick W Serruys; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Drug-eluting stents compared with thin-strut bare stents for the reduction of restenosis: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Jürgen Pache; Alban Dibra; Julinda Mehilli; Josef Dirschinger; Albert Schömig; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Venu Jasti; Eugen Ivan; Venkata Yalamanchili; Nattawut Wongpraparut; Massoud A Leesar
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment.

Authors:  K M Das; Ayman A El-Menyar; Amar M Salam; Rajvir Singh; Wafer Amin K Dabdoob; Hajar A Albinali; Jassim Al Suwaidi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the sirius trial.

Authors:  Shinjo Sonoda; Yoshihiro Morino; Junya Ako; Mitsuyasu Terashima; Ali H M Hassan; Heidi N Bonneau; Martin B Leon; Jeffrey W Moses; Paul G Yock; Yasuhiro Honda; Richard E Kuntz; Peter J Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2012 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Assessment of the healing process after percutaneous implantation of a cardiovascular device: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elodie Perdreau; Zakaria Jalal; Richard D Walton; Jérôme Naulin; Julie Magat; Bruno Quesson; Hubert Cochet; Olivier Bernus; Jean-Benoît Thambo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in the detection of coronary artery in-stent restenosis: evidence from an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Dai; Jiang-Rong Wang; Peng-Fei Hu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.