Literature DB >> 18165270

Evaluation of the Epstein-Barr virus R-gene quantification kit in whole blood with different extraction methods and PCR platforms.

Samira Fafi-Kremer1, Patrice Morand, Come Barranger, Gérard Barguès, Stéphane Magro, Jérôme Bés, Philippe Bourgeois, Martine Joannes, Jean-Marie Seigneurin.   

Abstract

Reliable real-time quantitative PCR assays to measure Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA load (EBV) are useful for monitoring EBV-associated diseases. We evaluated a new commercial kit, EBV R-gene Quantification kit (Argene, Varilhes, France) to quantify EBV DNA load in whole blood. Assay performance was assessed with two PCR platforms (LightCycler 2.0 and SmartCycler 2.0) and three commercial DNA extraction methods. The assay was compared with our in-house real-time EBV PCR using samples from the Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics 2006 EBV proficiency program and using 167 whole-blood specimens from individuals with infectious mononucleosis, from transplanted or HIV-infected patients, and from EBV-seropositive healthy carriers. The EBV R-gene assay was sensitive to 500 copies of EBV DNA per milliliter of whole blood with the two PCR platforms and the three extraction methods and was linear across 4 orders of magnitude. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variations were less than 20%. Nine of 10 samples tested with the EBV R-gene were in agreement with the expected qualitative results of the Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics 2006 EBV proficiency program, and 7 of 10 samples were within +/-0.5 log units of the expected quantitative values, with discrepant results mostly observed for low viral load (ie, <1000 copies/ml). In the clinical specimens, the correlation between the R-gene assay and the in-house PCR was high (r=0.92). In conclusion, the EBV R-gene assay accurately assesses the EBV DNA load in whole blood of patients with various forms of EBV infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18165270      PMCID: PMC2175546          DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2008.070054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  26 in total

1.  Development of a real-time quantitative assay for detection of Epstein-Barr virus.

Authors:  H G Niesters; J van Esser; E Fries; K C Wolthers; J Cornelissen; A D Osterhaus
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Epstein-Barr virus infection.

Authors:  J I Cohen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Validation of Roche LightCycler Epstein-Barr virus quantification reagents in a clinical laboratory setting.

Authors:  Margaret L Gulley; Hongxin Fan; Sandra H Elmore
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Routine use of real-time quantitative PCR for laboratory diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infections.

Authors:  Karen Brengel-Pesce; Patrice Morand; Anne Schmuck; Marie-Josette Bourgeat; Marlyse Buisson; Gérard Barguès; Makhlouf Bouzid; Jean-Marie Seigneurin
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.327

5.  Patients at risk for development of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: plasma versus peripheral blood mononuclear cells as material for quantification of Epstein-Barr viral load by using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  H J Wagner; M Wessel; W Jabs; F Smets; L Fischer; G Offner; P Bucsky
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2001-09-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  A longitudinal and prospective study of Epstein-Barr virus load in AIDS-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Fabrice Bonnet; Anne-Christine Jouvencel; Marie Parrens; Magali Joblon Leon; Emmanuelle Cotto; Isabelle Garrigue; Philippe Morlat; Jacques Beylot; Hervé Fleury; Marie-Edith Lafon
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 3.168

7.  Epstein-Barr viral load assessment in immunocompetent patients with fulminant infectious mononucleosis.

Authors:  Jan A M van Laar; Corinne M P Buysse; Ann C T M Vossen; Björn Hjálmarsson; Bart van Den Berg; Kirsten van Lom; Jaap Deinum
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-04-08

8.  Performance characteristics of two real-time PCR assays for the quantification of Epstein-Barr virus DNA.

Authors:  Charles E Hill; Shealynn B Harris; Elizabeth E Culler; James C Zimring; Frederick S Nolte; Angela M Caliendo
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Toward standardization of Epstein-Barr virus DNA load monitoring: unfractionated whole blood as preferred clinical specimen.

Authors:  S J Stevens; I Pronk; J M Middeldorp
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of various blood compartments and reporting units for the detection and quantification of Epstein-Barr virus in peripheral blood.

Authors:  H Hakim; C Gibson; J Pan; K Srivastava; Z Gu; M J Bankowski; R T Hayden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of commercial extraction systems and PCR assays for quantification of Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in whole blood.

Authors:  Raphaële Germi; Julien Lupo; Touyana Semenova; Sylvie Larrat; Nelly Magnat; Laurence Grossi; Jean-Marie Seigneurin; Patrice Morand
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparative evaluation of a commercially available automated system for extraction of viral DNA from whole blood: application to monitoring of epstein-barr virus and cytomegalovirus load.

Authors:  Sylvie Pillet; Thomas Bourlet; Bruno Pozzetto
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Using Epstein-Barr viral load assays to diagnose, monitor, and prevent posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

Authors:  Margaret L Gulley; Weihua Tang
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Epstein-Barr virus: general factors, virus-related diseases and measurement of viral load after transplant.

Authors:  Luciana Cristina Fagundes Gequelin; Irina N Riediger; Sueli M Nakatani; Alexander W Biondo; Carmem M Bonfim
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2011

5.  An Isothermal, Multiplex Amplification Assay for Detection and Genotyping of Human Papillomaviruses in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues.

Authors:  Yi-Wei Tang; Lorena Lozano; Xin Chen; Troy D Querec; Nora Katabi; Antonio Moreno-Docón; Hongmei Wang; Daniel Fix; Louise De Brot; Tracy A McMillen; Ju-Yoon Yoon; Amparo Torroba; Youxiang Wang; Elizabeth R Unger; Kay J Park
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 6.  Laboratory assays for Epstein-Barr virus-related disease.

Authors:  Margaret L Gulley; Weihua Tang
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  Measurement of Epstein-Barr virus DNA load using a novel quantification standard containing two EBV DNA targets and SYBR Green I dye.

Authors:  Meav-Lang J Lay; Robyn M Lucas; Mala Ratnamohan; Janette Taylor; Anne-Louise Ponsonby; Dominic E Dwyer
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.099

8.  The impact of targeting repetitive BamHI-W sequences on the sensitivity and precision of EBV DNA quantification.

Authors:  Armen Sanosyan; Alexis Fayd'herbe de Maudave; Karine Bollore; Valérie Zimmermann; Vincent Foulongne; Philippe Van de Perre; Edouard Tuaillon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.