Literature DB >> 16707366

Performance characteristics of two real-time PCR assays for the quantification of Epstein-Barr virus DNA.

Charles E Hill1, Shealynn B Harris, Elizabeth E Culler, James C Zimring, Frederick S Nolte, Angela M Caliendo.   

Abstract

We compared the performance of a laboratory-developed 5'-nuclease real-time polymerase chain reaction assay and a commercial assay (LightCycler, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) for quantification of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA. Using standards provided by the manufacturer, the LightCycler assay was linear from 100 to 1 million copies per reaction. Based on dilution of a plasmid containing the amplicon, the laboratory-developed assay was linear from 22 to 45 million copies per reaction. Both assays detected 0.5 copies of genomic EBV DNA per reaction; both showed good reproducibility with coefficients of variation from 0.3% to 2.4% for the LightCycler and 1.8% to 5.1% for the laboratory-developed assay. For 31 whole blood specimens with measurable values in both assays, the viral load values obtained with the LightCycler averaged 2.3-fold higher than those obtained with the laboratory-developed assay. Testing 30 matched whole blood and plasma samples in the laboratory-developed assay showed whole blood viral load values averaged 10-fold higher than those for plasma. The LightCycler and laboratory-developed assays are sensitive and reproducible with broad linear ranges. Further clinical evaluation is needed to determine the viral load cutoff that is predictive of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16707366     DOI: 10.1309/ABEY-V2VK-E6DH-XAAA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Epstein-Barr virus R-gene quantification kit in whole blood with different extraction methods and PCR platforms.

Authors:  Samira Fafi-Kremer; Patrice Morand; Come Barranger; Gérard Barguès; Stéphane Magro; Jérôme Bés; Philippe Bourgeois; Martine Joannes; Jean-Marie Seigneurin
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Viral surveillance and subclinical viral infection in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Jodi M Smith; Vikas R Dharnidharka
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 3.  Using Epstein-Barr viral load assays to diagnose, monitor, and prevent posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

Authors:  Margaret L Gulley; Weihua Tang
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  Laboratory assays for Epstein-Barr virus-related disease.

Authors:  Margaret L Gulley; Weihua Tang
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  A global view of the oncogenic landscape in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an integrated analysis at the genetic and expression levels.

Authors:  Chunfang Hu; Wenbin Wei; Xiaoyi Chen; Ciaran B Woodman; Yunhong Yao; John M Nicholls; Irène Joab; Sim K Sihota; Jian-Yong Shao; K Dalia Derkaoui; Aicha Amari; Stephanie L Maloney; Andrew I Bell; Paul G Murray; Christopher W Dawson; Lawrence S Young; John R Arrand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Duplex realtime PCR method for Epstein-Barr virus and human DNA quantification: its application for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders detection.

Authors:  María Dolores Fellner; Karina Durand; Marcelo Rodriguez; Lucía Irazu; Virginia Alonio; María Alejandra Picconi
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.257

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.