Literature DB >> 18164700

Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation.

Sarah Brown-Schmidt1, Christine Gunlogson, Michael K Tanenhaus.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the role of common ground in the production and on-line interpretation of wh-questions such as What's above the cow with shoes? Experiment 1 examined unscripted conversation, and found that speakers consistently use wh-questions to inquire about information known only to the addressee. Addressees were sensitive to this tendency, and quickly directed attention toward private entities when interpreting these questions. A second experiment replicated the interpretation findings in a more constrained setting. These results add to previous evidence that the common ground influences initial language processes, and suggests that the strength and polarity of common ground effects may depend on contributions of sentence type as well as the interactivity of the situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18164700      PMCID: PMC2491908          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  10 in total

1.  The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking.

Authors:  J E Arnold; J G Eisenband; S Brown-Schmidt; J C Trueswell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-07-14

2.  Taking perspective in conversation: the role of mutual knowledge in comprehension.

Authors:  B Keysar; D J Barr; J A Balin; J S Brauner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-01

3.  Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution.

Authors:  Aparna S Nadig; Julie C Sedivy
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-07

4.  Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs.

Authors:  Roger Bakeman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

Review 5.  Language processing in the natural world.

Authors:  Michael K Tanenhaus; Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The role of perspective in identifying domains of reference.

Authors:  Daphna Heller; Daniel Grodner; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-06-30

7.  Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: a targeted language game approach.

Authors:  Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-06-01

8.  Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  M K Tanenhaus; M J Spivey-Knowlton; K M Eberhard; J C Sedivy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts.

Authors:  K M Eberhard; M J Spivey-Knowlton; J C Sedivy; M K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1995-11

10.  Limits on theory of mind use in adults.

Authors:  Boaz Keysar; Shuhong Lin; Dale J Barr
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-08
  10 in total
  27 in total

1.  How do I remember that I know you know that I know?

Authors:  Rachael D Rubin; Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Melissa C Duff; Daniel Tranel; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-11-28

Review 2.  Language processing in the natural world.

Authors:  Michael K Tanenhaus; Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Influence of perspective and goals on reference production in conversation.

Authors:  Si On Yoon; Sungryong Koh; Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

4.  The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension.

Authors:  Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

Review 5.  Language in dialogue: when confederates might be hazardous to your data.

Authors:  Anna K Kuhlen; Susan E Brennan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

6.  To name or to describe: shared knowledge affects referential form.

Authors:  Daphna Heller; Kristen S Gorman; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-03-02

7.  Memory and Common Ground Processes in Language Use.

Authors:  Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Melissa C Duff
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-10-31

8.  Modeling Intensive Polytomous Time-Series Eye-Tracking Data: A Dynamic Tree-Based Item Response Model.

Authors:  Sun-Joo Cho; Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Paul De Boeck; Jianhong Shen
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  What's learned together stays together: speakers' choice of referring expression reflects shared experience.

Authors:  Kristen S Gorman; Whitney Gegg-Harrison; Chelsea R Marsh; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Tracking Colisteners' Knowledge States During Language Comprehension.

Authors:  Olessia Jouravlev; Rachael Schwartz; Dima Ayyash; Zachary Mineroff; Edward Gibson; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.