Literature DB >> 19815795

The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension.

Sarah Brown-Schmidt1.   

Abstract

During conversation, interlocutors build on the set of shared beliefs known as common ground. Although there is general agreement that interlocutors maintain representations of common ground, there is no consensus regarding whether common-ground representations constrain initial language interpretation processes. Here, I propose that executive functioning--specifically, failures in inhibition control--can account for some occasional insensitivities to common-ground information. The present article presents the results of an experiment that demonstrates that individual differences in inhibition control determine the degree to which addressees successfully inhibit perspective-inappropriate interpretations of temporary referential ambiguities in their partner's speech. Whether mentioned information was grounded or not also played a role, suggesting that addressees may show sensitivity to common ground only when it is established collaboratively. The results suggest that, in conversation, perspective information routinely guides online language processing and that occasional insensitivities to perspective can be attributed partly to difficulties in inhibiting perspective-inappropriate interpretations.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19815795     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

1.  Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind.

Authors:  S M Carlson; L J Moses
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

2.  Theory of mind and conceptual change.

Authors:  H M Wellman; D Cross
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2001 May-Jun

3.  Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution.

Authors:  Aparna S Nadig; Julie C Sedivy
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-07

4.  Predicting cognitive control from preschool to late adolescence and young adulthood.

Authors:  Inge-Marie Eigsti; Vivian Zayas; Walter Mischel; Yuichi Shoda; Ozlem Ayduk; Mamta B Dadlani; Matthew C Davidson; J Lawrence Aber; B J Casey
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-06

5.  Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation.

Authors:  Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Christine Gunlogson; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-12-31

6.  Processing demands in belief-desire reasoning: inhibition or general difficulty?

Authors:  Ori Friedman; Alan M Leslie
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2005-05

7.  Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground.

Authors:  Dale J Barr
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-08-28

8.  The role of perspective in identifying domains of reference.

Authors:  Daphna Heller; Daniel Grodner; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-06-30

Review 9.  Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts.

Authors:  K M Eberhard; M J Spivey-Knowlton; J C Sedivy; M K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1995-11

10.  Limits on theory of mind use in adults.

Authors:  Boaz Keysar; Shuhong Lin; Dale J Barr
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-08
View more
  43 in total

1.  Social Coordination in Older Adulthood: A Dual-Process Model.

Authors:  Meghan L Healey; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?

Authors:  Ariel N James; Scott H Fraundorf; Eun-Kyung Lee; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  The director task: A test of Theory-of-Mind use or selective attention?

Authors:  Paula Rubio-Fernández
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

4.  Predicting others' knowledge: Knowledge estimation as cue utilization.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11

5.  To name or to describe: shared knowledge affects referential form.

Authors:  Daphna Heller; Kristen S Gorman; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-03-02

Review 6.  Why are bilinguals better than monolinguals at false-belief tasks?

Authors:  Paula Rubio-Fernández
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

7.  The interplay of local attraction, context and domain-general cognitive control in activation and suppression of semantic distractors during sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; John C Trueswell; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

8.  What's learned together stays together: speakers' choice of referring expression reflects shared experience.

Authors:  Kristen S Gorman; Whitney Gegg-Harrison; Chelsea R Marsh; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The cognitive mechanisms underlying perspective taking between conversational partners: evidence from speakers with Alzheimer׳s disease.

Authors:  Liane Wardlow; Iva Ivanova; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Tracking Colisteners' Knowledge States During Language Comprehension.

Authors:  Olessia Jouravlev; Rachael Schwartz; Dima Ayyash; Zachary Mineroff; Edward Gibson; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.