Literature DB >> 19890480

Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: a targeted language game approach.

Sarah Brown-Schmidt1, Michael K Tanenhaus.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the restriction of referential domains during unscripted conversation by analyzing the modification and on-line interpretation of referring expressions. Experiment 1 demonstrated that from the earliest moments of processing, addressees interpreted referring expressions with respect to referential domains constrained by the conversation. Analysis of eye movements during the conversation showed elimination of standard competition effects seen with scripted language. Results from Experiment 2 pinpointed two pragmatic factors responsible for restriction of the referential domains used by speakers to design referential expressions and demonstrated that the same factors predict whether addressees consider local competitors to be potential referents during on-line interpretation of the same expressions. These experiments demonstrate for the first time that on-line interpretation of referring expressions in conversation is facilitated by referential domains constrained by pragmatic factors which predict when addressees are likely to encounter temporary ambiguity in language processing.

Year:  2008        PMID: 19890480      PMCID: PMC2771881          DOI: 10.1080/03640210802066816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  19 in total

1.  Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints.

Authors:  Delphine Dahan; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?

Authors:  Tanya Kraljic; Susan E Brennan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs.

Authors:  Roger Bakeman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

4.  The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing.

Authors:  P Zwitserlood
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1989-06

5.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Language and thought: aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics.

Authors:  D R Olson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 7.  Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts.

Authors:  K M Eberhard; M J Spivey-Knowlton; J C Sedivy; M K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1995-11

8.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

9.  Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies.

Authors:  W Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-08-24       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  28 in total

1.  How do I remember that I know you know that I know?

Authors:  Rachael D Rubin; Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Melissa C Duff; Daniel Tranel; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-11-28

Review 2.  Language processing in the natural world.

Authors:  Michael K Tanenhaus; Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation.

Authors:  Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Christine Gunlogson; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-12-31

4.  A new experimental paradigm to study children's processing of their parent's unscripted language input.

Authors:  Sudha Arunachalam
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 5.  Language in dialogue: when confederates might be hazardous to your data.

Authors:  Anna K Kuhlen; Susan E Brennan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

6.  What happened (and what didn't): Discourse constraints on encoding of plausible alternatives.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Aaron S Benjamin; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  What's learned together stays together: speakers' choice of referring expression reflects shared experience.

Authors:  Kristen S Gorman; Whitney Gegg-Harrison; Chelsea R Marsh; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Experimental investigations of weak definite and weak indefinite noun phrases.

Authors:  Natalie M Klein; Whitney M Gegg-Harrison; Greg N Carlson; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-05-15

10.  Perceiving referential intent: Dynamics of reference in natural parent-child interactions.

Authors:  John C Trueswell; Yi Lin; Benjamin Armstrong; Erica A Cartmill; Susan Goldin-Meadow; Lila R Gleitman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.