Literature DB >> 22234805

Influence of knee flexion and femoral cross-pin insertion angle on posterolateral structures of the knee and lateral fixation lengths during ACL reconstruction.

Jin Goo Kim1, Yong Seuk Lee, Jeong Ku Ha, Sung Soo Jun, Young Jin Chang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Some studies have investigated knee flexion angle on the sagittal plane and insertion angle of the cross-pin on the coronal plane to evaluate proper femoral fixation. They evaluated the possibilities of injury to the posterolateral (PL) and neurovascular structures using several methods. The purposes of this study were to evaluate (1) the influence of knee flexion and femoral cross-pin insertion angles on knee PL structures and (2) the lateral fixation length of the cross-pin.
METHODS: Ten fresh cadaveric knees with no previous surgeries around the knee were used. Transtibial femoral tunnels (1:30 or 10:30 o'clock position) were made at three different knee flexion angles (70°, 90°, and 110°). Two cross-pin guidewires (superior and inferior pins) were drilled at three different insertion angles [downward 30°, 0° (parallel to floor line), and upward 30°] for each knee flexion position. The distances from the insertion point of the two cross-pins to the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and popliteus tendon (PT), and the distance from the lateral wall of the femoral tunnel to the lateral cortex of the femoral condyle were measured.
RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the superior and inferior pin depths (p = 0.56 and 0.39). The distances from the superior pin to the LCL and from the inferior pin to the LCL were significantly shorter in all knee flexions with 0° and an upward 30° insertion angle than with 70° and 90° knee flexion with a downward 30° insertion angle, respectively (superior pin: p = 0.02 and 0.03; inferior pin: p = 0.03 and 0.03). No significant difference was observed in the distance between the superior pin and inferior pins and the PT (p = 0.25).
CONCLUSIONS: The cross-pin was inserted close to the LCL and PT, and a downward 30° angle was the safest insertion angle. Lateral fixation length was sufficient for the cross-pin fixation in the 10:30- or 1:30-positioned femoral tunnel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22234805     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-011-0922-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  14 in total

1.  Broken bioabsorbable femoral cross-pin after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft: a case report.

Authors:  Ilkyu Han; Yeon Ho Kim; Jae Ho Yoo; Sang Cheol Seong; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Do broken cross-pins compromise stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendons?

Authors:  Nam-Hong Choi; Jung-Hoon Lee; Brian N Victoroff
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Transverse femoral fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstrings grafts: an anatomic study about the relationships between the transcondylar device and the posterolateral structures of the knee.

Authors:  Nicolas Pujol; Thierry David; Thomas Bauer; Philippe Hardy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Analysis of the graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel aperture in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the transtibial and the far anteromedial portal technique.

Authors:  Koji Nishimoto; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kiyonori Mizuno; Yuichi Hoshino; Kouki Nagamune; Seiji Kubo; Masayoshi Yagi; Motoi Yamaguchi; Shinichi Yoshiya; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The effect of intra-operative knee flexion angle on determination of graft location in the anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yuichi Hoshino; Kouki Nagamune; Masayoshi Yagi; Daisuke Araki; Koji Nishimoto; Seiji Kubo; Doita Minoru; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Influence of knee flexion angle on femoral tunnel characteristics when drilled through the anteromedial portal during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Georges Basdekis; Claude Abisafi; Pascal Christel
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Loose intra-articular body following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  A J Cossey; R S Paterson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Femoral bioabsorbable cross-pin fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Jun Sic Park; Yong Seuk Lee; Young Jin Cho
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Broken femoral cross pin after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: case report.

Authors:  Neal C Chen; Robert E Boykin; Peter J Millett
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  The influence of tibial positioning on the diagnostic accuracy of combined posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral rotatory instability of the knee.

Authors:  Young-Bok Jung; Chang-Hyun Nam; Ho-Joong Jung; Yong-Seuk Lee; Young-Bong Ko
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.