Literature DB >> 1814249

An evaluation of 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 2% mepivacaine with 1:20,000 levonordefrin compared with 2% lidocaine with:100,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block.

S A Hinkley1, A Reader, M Beck, W J Meyers.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the degree of anesthesia obtained with 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 2% mepivacaine with 1:20,000 levonordefrin compared with 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block. Using a repeated measures design, 30 subjects randomly received an inferior alveolar injection using masked cartridges of each solution at three successive appointments. The first molar, first premolar, lateral incisor, and contralateral canine (control) were blindly tested with an Analytic Technology pulp tester at 3-min cycles for 50 min. Anesthetic success was defined as no subject response to the maximum output of the pulp tester (80 reading) within 16 min and maintenance of this reading for the remainder of the testing period.Although subjects felt numb subjectively, anesthetic success as defined here occurred in 46% to 57% of the molars, in 50% to 57% of the premolars, and in 21% to 36% of the lateral incisors. No statistically significant differences in onset, success, failure, or incidence were found among the solutions. We conclude that the three preparations are equivalent for inferior alveolar nerve block of 50-min duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1814249      PMCID: PMC2161976     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  15 in total

1.  MINIMUM DOSAGE TECHNIQUE IN THE CLINICAL COMPARISON OF REPRESENTATIVE MODERN LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENTS.

Authors:  A COWAN
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1964 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Studies on the duration of local anesthesia. Effects of volume and concentration of a local anesthetic solution on the duration of dental infiltration anesthesia.

Authors:  G Aberg; G Sydnes
Journal:  Int J Oral Surg       Date:  1978-06

3.  An evaluation of an electric pulp tester as a measure of analgesia in human vital teeth.

Authors:  L J Dreven; A Reader; M Beck; W J Meyers; J Weaver
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  The periodontal ligament injection: a comparison of the efficacy in human maxillary and mandibular teeth.

Authors:  J J White; A Reader; M Beck; W J Meyers
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Clinical evaluation of mepivacaine and lidocaine.

Authors:  D J Bradley; N D Martin
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 2.291

6.  Prilocaine and lignocaine plus adrenaline. A clinical comparison.

Authors:  G Brown; N L Ward
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1969-06-17       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  Periodontal ligament injection: a clinical evaluation.

Authors:  R E Walton; B J Abbott
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  Difficulties in achieving local anesthesia.

Authors:  E Kaufman; P Weinstein; P Milgrom
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.634

9.  An evaluation of volumes and concentrations of lidocaine in human inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  D L Vreeland; A Reader; M Beck; W Meyers; J Weaver
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.171

10.  Conduction block analgesia in the mandible. A comparative investigation of the techniques of Fischer and Gow-Gates.

Authors:  E Agren; K Danielsson
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  1981
View more
  22 in total

1.  Anesthetic efficacy of infiltrations in mandibular anterior teeth.

Authors:  T Yonchak; A Reader; M Beck; K Clark; W J Meyers
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2001

2.  Summary of the scientific literature for pain and anxiety control in dentistry.

Authors:  L C Hassett
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1992

3.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4% prilocaine for maxillary infiltrations.

Authors:  Steven Katz; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2010

4.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% mepivacaine with 1 : 20,000 levonordefrin versus 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine for maxillary infiltrations.

Authors:  Ingrid Lawaty; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2010

Review 5.  Effective anaesthesia of the acutely inflamed pulp: part 1. The acutely inflamed pulp.

Authors:  S S Virdee; D Seymour; S Bhakta
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Anesthetic efficacy of buccal and lingual infiltrations of lidocaine following an inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular posterior teeth.

Authors:  William Foster; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2007

7.  Anesthetic efficacy of 3 volumes of lidocaine with epinephrine in maxillary infiltration anesthesia.

Authors:  Paula Cristina Brunetto; José Ranali; Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano; Patrícia Cristine de Oliveira; Francisco Carlos Groppo; John Gerard Meechan; Maria Cristina Volpato
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2008

8.  Efficacy of 4 % Articaine and 2 % Lidocaine: A clinical study.

Authors:  Deepashri H Kambalimath; R S Dolas; H V Kambalimath; S M Agrawal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-04-05

9.  Anesthetic efficacy of an infiltration in mandibular anterior teeth following an inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Al Reader; Mike Beck; William J Meyers
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2002

10.  An evaluation of lidocaine hydrocarbonate compared with lidocaine hydrochloride for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  M A Chaney; R Kerby; A Reader; F M Beck; W J Meyers; J Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.