Literature DB >> 18093828

Oncological safety and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.

N Patani1, H Devalia, A Anderson, K Mokbel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The management of early breast cancer with skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is not based on evidence from randomised controlled trials. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the oncological safety, post-operative morbidity and patients' satisfaction with SSM and IBR using the latissimus dorsi (LD) myocutaneous flap and/or breast prosthesis.
METHODS: Eighty-three consecutive women underwent 93 SSMs with IBR (10 bilateral), using the LD flap plus implant (n=55) or implant alone (n=38), indications included early breast cancer and prophylaxis due to BRCA-1 gene mutation. Nipple reconstruction was performed in 38 patients, using the trefoil local flap technique, nipple sharing or Monocryl mesh. Twenty-three underwent contra-lateral surgery in order to optimise symmetry, including 15 augmentations and eight mastopexy/reduction mammoplasties. Patient satisfaction with the outcome of surgery was assessed on a linear visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (most satisfied).
RESULTS: There was no local recurrence (LR) after a median follow-up of 34 months (range=3-79 months). Overall survival was 98.8%, three patients developed distant disease and one patient died of metastatic breast cancer. No case of partial or total LD flap loss was observed. Morbidities included infection, requiring implant removal in two patients and one patient developed marginal ischaemia of the skin envelope. Significant capsule formation, requiring capsulotomy, was observed in 87% of patients who had either PMR or prior RT compared with 13% for those who did not have RT. Sixty-one (73.5%) of 83 patients completed the questionnaire with a median and mean satisfaction scores of 10.0 and 9.3, respectively (range=6-10).
CONCLUSION: SSM with IBR is associated with low morbidity, high levels of patient satisfaction and is oncologically adequate for T(is), T1 and T2 tumours without extensive skin involvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18093828     DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2007.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0960-7404            Impact factor:   3.279


  23 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of video-assisted skin-sparing partial mastectomy for breast cancer and immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi muscle flap as breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Hiroo Nakajima; Ikuya Fujiwara; Naruhiko Mizuta; Koichi Sakaguchi; Mahiro Ohashi; Asako Nishiyama; Yoshimi Umeda; Miho Ichida; Junji Magae
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennica Platt; Nancy Baxter; Toni Zhong
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Factors influencing the decision to pursue immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Mariska Weenk; Philipp Wunschel; Erwin Heine; Luc J Strobbe
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

4.  Preservation of the nipple-areola complex in skin-sparing mastectomy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Ryo Miyake; Satoki Kinoshita; Naoko Shimada; Ken Uchida; Hiroshi Takeyama; Toshiaki Morikawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and short-term morbidity in patients undergoing mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicholas B Abt; José M Flores; Pablo A Baltodano; Karim A Sarhane; Francis M Abreu; Carisa M Cooney; Michele A Manahan; Vered Stearns; Martin A Makary; Gedge D Rosson
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Appalachian Status Is a Negative Predictor of Breast Reconstruction Following Breast Cancer Resection.

Authors:  Ryan C DeCoster; Megan A Stout; Jack C Burns; Max A Shrout; Margaret Wetzel; Adam J Dugan; Brian D Rinker; Timothy A Butterfield; J Matthew Webster; Henry C Vasconez
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Effect of Home Monitoring via Mobile App on the Number of In-Person Visits Following Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kathleen A Armstrong; Peter C Coyte; Mitchell Brown; Brett Beber; John L Semple
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Does Immediate Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy affect the Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy?

Authors:  Jeonghui Lee; Se Kyung Lee; Sangmin Kim; Min Young Koo; Min-Young Choi; Soo Youn Bae; Dong Hui Cho; Jiyoung Kim; Seung Pil Jung; Jun-Ho Choe; Jung-Han Kim; Jee Soo Kim; Jeong Eon Lee; Jung-Hyun Yang; Seok Jin Nam
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.588

Review 9.  Recent advances in the surgical care of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Alessandra Mascaro; Massimo Farina; Raffaella Gigli; Carlo E Vitelli; Lucio Fortunato
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 10.  Prosthetic breast reconstruction: indications and update.

Authors:  Tam T Quinn; George S Miller; Marie Rostek; Miguel S Cabalag; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.