Literature DB >> 18088419

Construction and characterization of an expressed sequenced tag library for the mosquito vector Armigeres subalbatus.

George F Mayhew1, Lyric C Bartholomay, Hang-Yen Kou, Thomas A Rocheleau, Jeremy F Fuchs, Matthew T Aliota, I-Yu Tsao, Chiung-Yen Huang, Tze-Tze Liu, Kwang-Jen Hsiao, Shih-Feng Tsai, Ueng-Cheng Yang, Nicole T Perna, Wen-Long Cho, Bruce M Christensen, Cheng-Chen Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mosquito, Armigeres subalbatus, mounts a distinctively robust innate immune response when infected with the nematode Brugia malayi, a causative agent of lymphatic filariasis. In order to mine the transcriptome for new insight into the cascade of events that takes place in response to infection in this mosquito, 6 cDNA libraries were generated from tissues of adult female mosquitoes subjected to immune-response activation treatments that lead to well-characterized responses, and from aging, naïve mosquitoes. Expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from each library were produced, annotated, and subjected to comparative analyses.
RESULTS: Six libraries were constructed and used to generate 44,940 expressed sequence tags, of which 38,079 passed quality filters to be included in the annotation project and subsequent analyses. All of these sequences were collapsed into clusters resulting in 8,020 unique sequence clusters or singletons. EST clusters were annotated and curated manually within ASAP (A Systematic Annotation Package for Community Analysis of Genomes) web portal according to BLAST results from comparisons to Genbank, and the Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster genome projects.
CONCLUSION: The resulting dataset is the first of its kind for this mosquito vector and provides a basis for future studies of mosquito vectors regarding the cascade of events that occurs in response to infection, and thereby providing insight into vector competence and innate immunity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18088419      PMCID: PMC2262096          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


Background

The perpetuation of mosquito-borne diseases is dependent on the compatibility of the pathogen with its invertebrate and vertebrate hosts, as dictated by each respective genome. The failure of traditional mosquito-borne disease control efforts to reduce the burden of these diseases on public health has created an incentive to develop a more comprehensive understanding of molecular interactions between host and pathogen, in order to develop novel means to control disease transmission. Innate immune responsiveness in the mosquito host is of particular interest in such explorations because extensive research efforts have shown that vector mosquito species produce robust humoral and cellular immune responses against invading pathogens [1-4]. A vector species that employs a unique, robust immune response against an invading pathogen is the mosquito, Armigeres subalbatus, a natural vector of the nematode parasites that cause lymphatic filariasis. This debilitating disease affects 120 million people annually, one third of who suffer gross pathology (CDC 2006). Ar. subalbatus is ideally suited for laboratory studies of immune responsiveness because it is a natural vector of the filarial worm, Brugia pahangi, but it exhibits a refractory state to the microfilariae of Brugia malayi by virtue of a strong melanotic encapsulation response; therefore, it is the ideal organism for studying molecular mechanisms of the anti-filarial worm response as a function of the broader innate immune capacity of the mosquito. In fact, Ar. subalbatus is one of the few species of mosquito to effectively use melanotic encapsulation as a natural defense mechanism against metazoan pathogens [5]. Ar. subalbatus also serves as a competent laboratory vector of Plasmodium gallinaceum, the causative agent of avian malaria in Asia ([6] and Christensen et al., unpublished data), and also has been implicated in the transmission of Japanese encephalitis virus in Taiwan [7,8]. Experimental evidence has shown that humoral and cellular immune responses play a fundamental role in mosquito refractoriness to a particular pathogen; however, very little is known about their genetic control. As a result, our laboratory is using Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) as a tool to elucidate the function of known genes and assist in the discovery of previously unknown, "immunity"-related genes. In addition, this high-throughput molecular approach to gene discovery provides the capacity to tactically design oligonucleotide-based microarrays that can be further used to gain insight into vector-pathogen interactions. With no genome sequencing project on the horizon for Ar. subalbatus, these EST libraries and microarrays constitute the only tools currently available to gauge immune responsiveness in this medically important vector species. We previously reported a comprehensive analysis of ESTs from complementary DNA (cDNA) libraries created from adult, female Ar. subalbatus hemocytes [1]. Experimental evidence has shown the importance of mosquito hemocytes (blood cells) as both initiators and mediators of mosquito immune responses [9-13]; therefore, material was collected from the perfusate (which contains hemocytes) of Micrococcus luteus and Escherichia coli inoculated mosquitoes at 1, 3, 6, 12, & 24 hours post bacterial inoculation. These bacterial species have been extensively used to examine immune peptide production in mosquitoes [14,15], and each activates a different arm of the innate immune response. The primary response of Ar. subalbatus to E. coli is phagocytosis, whereas the primary response to M. luteus is melanization, and it has been determined that this is independent of Gram type [10,11]. In order to more completely represent the baseline physiology and innate immune capabilities of this mosquito, cDNA libraries were created from adult, female Ar. subalbatus mRNA collected from whole body mosquitoes inoculated with the same mixture of bacteria. Material also was collected from whole body Ar. subalbatus exposed to filarial worm parasites. A blood meal containing B. malayi induces the melanization response in Ar. subalbatus; therefore, whole body material was collected from female mosquitoes 24, 48, and 72 hours after an infective blood feed. Intrathoracic injection of Dirofilaria immitis microfilariae into the mosquito's hemocoel also induces a strong melanotic encapsulation response in Ar. subalbatus and is a model system by which the immune response is stimulated without exposing the mosquito to both the parasite and a blood meal [16]. This model system for infection facilitates the uncoupling of two processes – namely blood meal digestion and ovarian development – that compete for biochemical resources [17]. Whole body mosquitoes inoculated with D. immitis were collected at 24 and 48 hours post-inoculation. Libraries also were constructed from 5–7 and 14–21 day old naïve whole body females to ensure representation of transcripts from non-immune activated, aging mosquitoes. An attempt to sequence clones from a library from blood-fed naïve females was not successful.

Results and Discussion

Sequencing and clustering

Non-normalized cDNA libraries were constructed from newly emerged female mosquitoes inoculated with bacteria, inoculated or blood fed with filarial worm parasites, and from aging, naïve adult females. ESTs were sequenced from the 5' end by the University of Wisconsin Genome Sequencing Center, and the National Yang-Ming University core facility, and were assembled to collapse the entire dataset, reduce redundancy, and simplify downstream annotation (Table 1). Of the 44,940 trace files generated by the two sequencing units, 38,079 traces passed quality control (85% success rate) and were sent to assembly with an average high quality (phred score 20+) length of 450 bases. The resulting collapsed data resulted in 8,020 clusters, of which 4,949 are composed of one trace (singletons). The deepest cluster contains 870 ESTs, with an average of 11 (+/- 37) ESTs per cluster.
Table 1

Summary of Ar. subalbatus EST and EST cluster production from six cDNA libraries.

# ESTs# EST clusters
Bacteria (whole body)5,6542,372
Bacteria (hemocytes)11,3002,107
D. immitis (whole body)7,0142,510
B. malayi (whole body)7,1923,096
Naïve 7 (whole body)4,2891,911
Naïve 14 (whole body)5,4052,325
Combined38,0798,020

The condition of mosquitoes/inocula used to generate the material for each cDNA library is listed in the left-hand column. Bacteria = mixture of E. coli and M. luteus.

Summary of Ar. subalbatus EST and EST cluster production from six cDNA libraries. The condition of mosquitoes/inocula used to generate the material for each cDNA library is listed in the left-hand column. Bacteria = mixture of E. coli and M. luteus.

Functional annotation of EST clusters and singletons

Consensus sequences from clustering were output in fasta format and used in comparisons to the GenBank non-redundant database, the D. melanogaster and An. gambiae genomes, and to the other Ar. subalbatus EST sets created during the project. Each EST cluster/singleton and its corresponding sequence similarity data were uploaded into ASAP. Within the ASAP interface, annotators assessed sequence alignments and followed intact hyperlinks to NCBI, the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (Ensembl), FlyBase, and orthologous sequences within ASAP and at National Yang Ming University, in order to ascribe a predicted gene product and/or function to each sequence. Supporting evidence for each annotation is typically in the form of a hyperlink to a database and can be viewed in ASAP. These annotations then were reviewed and approved or rejected by a curator. Annotation followed the controlled vocabulary established in a previous study, such that each EST cluster was attributed with some functional information, and indication of quality of the BLAST hit used to attribute that information [1]. Of the 8,020 EST clusters, 2,843 were annotated as "unknown" (having no significant match to any of the databases searched), and 1896 were annotated as "conserved unknown" with varying degrees of confidence. Sequences were submitted to NCBI as annotated EST clusters into the Core Nucleotide database and made available for public viewing through ASAP.

Library to library comparison

An analysis of EST clusters from the complete project was done by combining annotations and cluster composition (in terms of source libraries) to provide insight into the molecular effort put forth by the mosquito in the face of different types of immunological challenge. Within Microsoft Access, a table was built that contains EST clusters according to ASAP ID number, contig number (created during assembly in Seqman), project (cDNA library) from which ESTs were contributed, and the number of ESTs contributed per project. Queries were built to extract the number of EST clusters unique to a particular library (e.g., bacteria-inoculated whole body), or shared between projects (e.g. bacteria-inoculated whole body and hemocyte libraries) (Figure 1). Shared are 69 clusters unique to a response to bacteria-inoculation, 98 unique to the response against filarial nematodes, and 4,498 are represented in at least one of the 4 immune-activated projects. Amongst those 4,498, 20 are represented in all 4 of those projects, perhaps indicative of the importance of these genes in immune responsiveness. Included amongst these 20 is a Clip domain serine protease (An. gambiae [ENSANGP00000017225]), Serpin 27A (D. melanogaster [FBgn0028990]), and Aslectin (AY426975) – a ficolin-like pattern recognition molecule [18]. Unique to the response against B. malayi infection is a protein-tyrosine kinase, involved in the JAK-STAT cascade, which is represented by 107 ESTs.
Figure 1

A comparison of EST clusters from . The type of immune response activation for mosquitoes is listed in the primary row and column. At the intersection of each row and column, the number of clusters unique to that combination of libraries is listed in bold, followed by the number of those clusters that are designated as unknown (U) or conserved unknown (CU). Clusters from the 4 immune response activated libraries (Immune activated combined) were queried against the naïve libraries such that: a cluster is represented in at least 1 of the 4 libraries (but not in naive) (top -1), or clusters are represented in all 4 of the libraries (but not in naive) (bottom – 2).

A comparison of EST clusters from . The type of immune response activation for mosquitoes is listed in the primary row and column. At the intersection of each row and column, the number of clusters unique to that combination of libraries is listed in bold, followed by the number of those clusters that are designated as unknown (U) or conserved unknown (CU). Clusters from the 4 immune response activated libraries (Immune activated combined) were queried against the naïve libraries such that: a cluster is represented in at least 1 of the 4 libraries (but not in naive) (top -1), or clusters are represented in all 4 of the libraries (but not in naive) (bottom – 2). To examine the statistical likelihood that the numbers of ESTs in each cluster represent a true sampling of the biological variation between the six libraries, and to compare the results of clustering with microarray results [19], cluster data were submitted to the IDEG6 website for analysis [20]. The number of ESTs in each cluster was normalized based on the number of total ESTs collected and the total number of ESTs in each library. Six statistics were compared, including Audic and Claverie [21], Greller and Tobin [22], Stekel [23], Chi Square 2 × 2, general Chi Square, and Fisher's Exact Test, all corrected via a Bonferroni method. The results of the entire test are included as a supplementary table (see Additional file 1). Table 2 presents the 99 EST clusters that show the highest significant difference between libraries (p > 0.00001, R > 4). Although significant increases in ESTs encoding immune-related products are observed (i.e. sequences expected to be increasing according to infection status of the mosquitoes used to collect material for libraries), this is not always the case. Several clusters that encode "house keeping" products are demonstrably enriched for ESTs from immune-challenged libraries (e.g. cytochromes and dehydrogenases) suggesting that these metabolic genes play essential roles in the physiology of an immune and/or stress response. In addition, many of the clusters that are significantly different between libraries encode gene products of completely unknown function. A comparison with microarray data from Aliota, et al.[19], shows some overlap between the two methods. Out of the 99 clusters that are significantly different (Table 2), 19 share significant changes when compared with microarray data from B. malayi infected females (highlighted in Table 2). Combined, these EST and microarray data provide several target sequences for further study in relation to mosquito innate immunity.
Table 2

Clusters showing significant differences as determined by Stekel R value and Chi square analysis.

GBIDProductasuhemdiroinfimacbacbrumalnaïve7naïve14RChi
EU204979NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2245231410211900
EU204980NADH dehydrogenase subunit 61721881101100
EU204999cytochrome c oxidase subunit I245672411595400
EU205005unknown325523317266600
EU205016cytosolic small ribosomal subunit S266069574136670.0000010.000001
EU205017NADH dehydrogenase28224610.0000020.000001
EU205057ubiquitin830001000
EU205058cytochrome c oxidase subunit III277798320625200
EU205059cytochrome b47191419800
EU205061mitochondrial adenosine triphosphatase subunit 620260361514500
EU205096ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase subunit62941291100
EU205097cytochrome c7415812111200
EU205100unknown2435912379547200
EU205101putative: conserved unknown3218732060.0000010.000002
EU205152ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase561451114900
EU205153AT DNA binding071513680.0000020.00033
EU205154questionable: Bombyx mori prophenoloxidase activating factor 326133110.0000010
EU205155questionable: conserved unknown167218100.0000060.00008
EU205171ubiquinol-cytochrome-c reductase9416829202600
EU205182cytosolic large ribosomal subunit L3627433324264700
EU205185NADH dehydrogenase4728104700
EU205197gelsolin129203833135700
EU205226cytosolic large ribosomal subunit L40215005100.000005
EU205248cytochrome C oxidase subunit II52151269270.0000010.000002
EU205296Myosin alkali light chain 1353803600
EU205304questionable: receptor binding0002600.0002280.000002
EU205306questionable: cytochrome c oxidase63136613300
EU205324conserved unknown17040040.0000030.000054
EU205330cytosolic small ribosomal subunit S939734368325400
EU205338superoxide dismutase20210110.0000020.000001
EU205349ribosomal protein L412761001709412610400
EU205374nucleoside diphosphate kinase214111050.0000020.000002
EU205385questionable: protein-tyrosine kinase0001070000
EU205393hydrogen transporting two sector ATPase53111181790.0000030.000002
EU205409cecropin17110050.0000060.000023
EU205450serine protease1628931900
EU205451cytosolic small ribosomal subunit S3A7826271620290.0000680.000132
EU205465defensin136142765900
EU205470putative: heat shock001562300
EU205505lysozyme116173210113500
EU205526cytochrome c oxidase13015111016500
EU205556putative: conserved unknown003410300
EU205557putative: conserved unknown0009010.0000470.000003
EU205560cecropin3235173141100
EU205570putative: conserved unknown091315770.0000030.000718
EU205592conserved unknown6321111212160.0000070.000004
EU205632putative: calcium ion binding protein001300000
EU205658serine protease11218424372900
EU205659unknown350302000
EU205708proton-transporting ATP synthase complex subunit70894141600
EU205709putative: conserved unknown25032220.0000010
EU205750hydrogen-exporting ATPase332521900
EU205751putative: odorant-binding0009000.0000150
EU205764questionable: odorant-binding protein 56e0009000.0000150
EU205767trypsin000250000
EU205782trypsin1022198701077000
EU205800unknown5497113900
EU205806questionable: odorant-binding0001230000
EU205807questionable: odorant-binding000280000
EU205828trypsin385101133200
EU205832questionable: apolipophorin12905322600
EU205858vitellogenin C000180000
EU205893unknown1300000100
EU205915hydrogen transporting two sector ATPase416522400
EU205924putative: serine protease51328214600
EU205925putative: serine protease1151041250.0000010.000002
EU205991unknown031392400
EU205996ATPase synthase16410000.0000030.000012
EU206001NADH dehydrogenase36638710.0000010.000001
EU206048conserved unknown4581110460.0000210.000005
EU206083putative: serine protease000610000
EU206123putative: serine protease0511287800
EU206138questionable: conserved unknown000320000
EU206244cytosolic large ribosomal subunit L34a1381097300
EU206248zinc-metalloproteinase precursor2141012300
EU206376putative: cathepsin000300000
EU206422infection responsive short peptide (gambicin)1723404717240.0000010.000002
EU206504unknown000120000
EU206507ATP/ADP antiporter (transporter)213101000
EU206546beta-globin000340000
EU206601cathepsin000190000
EU206635trypsin040163200
EU206733putative: conserved unknown0009000.0000150
EU206824putative: arrestin 201368990.0000040.000307
EU206866questionable: conserved unknown000320000
EU206900rhodopsin0213115110.0000010.000066
EU206907questionable: chitin binding000120000
EU206986unprocessed 18S ribosomal RNA401010000
EU207626unknown900010200
EU207634unknown107566538228900
EU207658NADH dehydrogenase subunit26221850.0000030.000006
EU207722questionable: triacylglycerol lipase0008000.0000660.000002
EU207765putative: odorant-binding protein G.1A.F000220000
EU207810putative: trypsin000211000
EU207816hydrogen transporting two sector ATPase488868130.0000040.000001
EU207921vitellogenin000190000
EU207965defensin17250000.0000020.00002
EU208023questionable: threonine-rich salivary mucin0000640.0000310.000003
EU212979NADH dehydrogenase3651004300

Clusters and their constituent ESTs were analysed using IDEG6 [20] to find clusters where the number of ESTs were statistically different between the libraries. Of 8,020 clusters analysed, 99 showed a significantly differential number of ESTs collected from one or more of the libraries. Each row represents the Genbank Accession number for cluster, and the columns are the number of ESTs from each of the six libraries that are a member of it. The libraries are: asuhem (bacteria-inoculated, hemocyte), diroinf (whole body, Dirofilaria immitis injected), imacbac (bacteria-inoculated whole body), brumal (blood-fed Brugia malayi), n7 and n14 (naïve, 5–7 and 12–14 days of age). The R value is the inverse log of the Stekel R Score [23], and the Chi value is a general Chi square analysis.

Clusters showing significant differences as determined by Stekel R value and Chi square analysis. Clusters and their constituent ESTs were analysed using IDEG6 [20] to find clusters where the number of ESTs were statistically different between the libraries. Of 8,020 clusters analysed, 99 showed a significantly differential number of ESTs collected from one or more of the libraries. Each row represents the Genbank Accession number for cluster, and the columns are the number of ESTs from each of the six libraries that are a member of it. The libraries are: asuhem (bacteria-inoculated, hemocyte), diroinf (whole body, Dirofilaria immitis injected), imacbac (bacteria-inoculated whole body), brumal (blood-fed Brugia malayi), n7 and n14 (naïve, 5–7 and 12–14 days of age). The R value is the inverse log of the Stekel R Score [23], and the Chi value is a general Chi square analysis.

Gene ontology

To attribute more functional information to annotations in ASAP, Gene Ontology (GO) classifications were migrated from Flybase annotations to homologous Ar. subalbatus clusters, because Flybase contains the most complete dataset for a related species from which to draw. GO annotations were attributed to 2,793 (35% of total) EST clusters. From the perspective of the entire dataset, 851 (11%) clusters have annotations but lack a GO annotation. Data from GO analyses are presented graphically, according to second tier categories within the top-level categories of Biological Process, Cellular Compartment, and Molecular Function. Of particular interest for this dataset are those clusters related to innate immunity, so a more in-depth (4th and 6th tier) view is presented (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Summary of Gene Ontology assignments to 2,793 . A gene list of assigned annotations was processed using WEGO (Web Gene Ontology Annotation Plot). Numbers outside the pie charts represent the number of clusters within each category. (Top) Tier 2 summaries of the three main branches of the gene ontology: Molecular Function, Cellular Component, and Biological Process. The categories of physiological process (GO:0007582) and cellular process (GO:0009987) were removed from the display in order to visualize the categories containing fewer members. (Bottom) Pie charts of Tier 3 and Tier 4, 5, and 6 of the GO subcategory of Biological Processes, response to stimuli (GO:0050896) and defense response.

Summary of Gene Ontology assignments to 2,793 . A gene list of assigned annotations was processed using WEGO (Web Gene Ontology Annotation Plot). Numbers outside the pie charts represent the number of clusters within each category. (Top) Tier 2 summaries of the three main branches of the gene ontology: Molecular Function, Cellular Component, and Biological Process. The categories of physiological process (GO:0007582) and cellular process (GO:0009987) were removed from the display in order to visualize the categories containing fewer members. (Bottom) Pie charts of Tier 3 and Tier 4, 5, and 6 of the GO subcategory of Biological Processes, response to stimuli (GO:0050896) and defense response. Because of the unique immune response capabilities of Ar. subalbatus, EST clusters were interrogated beyond the GO analysis for clusters encoding immunity-related proteins. Those clusters encoding proteins that have a documented role in Ar. subalbatus immunity were sorted according to representation in different libraries (Table 3). In addition, immunity related genes and proteins were subdivided into categories including: CASPs: Caspases, CATs: Catalases, CLIPs: CLIP-Domain Serine Proteases, CTLs: C-Type Lectins, FREPs: Fibrinogen-Related Proteins, GALEs: Galactoside-Binding Lectins, IAPs: Inhibitors of Apoptosis, IMDPATHs: IMD Pathway Members, JAKSTATs: Signal Transduction, LYSs: Lysozymes, MLs: MD2-Like Receptors, PGRPs: Peptidoglycan Recognition Proteins, PPOs: Prophenoloxidases, PRDXs: Peroxidases, REL: Relish-like Proteins, SCRs: Scavenger Receptors, SODs: Superoxide Dismutatses, SPZs: Spaetzle-like Proteins, SRPNs: Serine Protease Inhibitors, TEPs: Thio-Ester Containing Proteins, TOLLs: Toll-Receptors, and TOLLPATHs: Toll Pathway Members. Representatives of each of these subcategories can be found amongst the ESTs in these libraries (Tables 3 and 4). Clusters identified as immunity-related according to homology to genes in ImmunoDB [24] were broken down into the number of ESTs represented per cluster from each library (Table 4).
Table 3

Armigeres subalbatus EST clusters that represent characterized, published sequences from this mosquito.

GB AccessionDescriptionASAPIDasuhemdiroinfimacbacbrumaln7n14
AF318200.1ABC membrane transporter (white)n/a
AY426976.1 (AY426975.1)aslectin AL-1ACN-0180799311100
ACN-0183776100000
AY603183.1beta 1,3-glucan recognition protein (GRP)ACN-0184624001000
AY662686.1dopa decarboxylaseACN-0182608021010
AY960762.1dopachrome conversion enzymeACN-0181349010001
AF317822.1glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6pd)n/a
AY571966.1phenylalanine hydroxylaseACN-0184263100111
AF260567.1prophenoloxidase In/a
AF286468.1prophenoloxidase IIn/a
AY487171.1prophenoloxidase IIIn/a
AY487172.1prophenoloxidase IVACN-0186737000100
DQ862064.1prophenoloxidase VACN-0182951001000
DQ862065.1prophenoloxidase VIACN-0186767010000
ACN-0182961100000
AY487170.1serine proteaseACN-0181859000100

Because of the unique, robust melanization response that is elicited when Ar. subalbatus is infected with certain nematode parasites, several molecules related to melanogenesis have been the subject of comprehensive characterization. EST clusters encoding these gene products are presented according to the number of ESTs in the following libraries: asuhem (bacteria-inoculated, hemocyte), diroinf (whole body, Dirofilaria immitis injected), imacbac (bacteria-inoculated whole body), brumal (blood-fed Brugia malayi), n7 and n14 (naïve, 7 and 14 days of age).

Table 4

Searching Ar. subalbatus EST clusters for immunity-related sequences based on homology to other flies.

FamilySubfamilyasuhemdiroinfimacbacbrumalnaïve7naïve14Total ReadsR Value
AMPCecropin9865705641473770.070988
AMPDefensin23841781615284160
AMPDiptericin02000130.160764
CASPCASP11011040.673041
CATCAT01000010.561495
CLIPCLIP-CLIP-CLIP-SPH11100140.670142
CLIPCLIP-SP13633372422272790
CLIPCLIP-SP-CLIP-SP10010020.668311
CLIPCLIP-SPH15333555814473600
CLIPSP-CLIP40000040.060745
CLIPSP-CLIP-SPH20010030.440816
CLIPSPH-CLIP10000010.754901
CLIPSPH-CLIP-SPH11020150.576541
CLIPSP-SPH-CLIP01000010.561495
CTLCTL8019271725171850.000002
FREPFREP17922448640.000764
GALEGALE00211260.206431
GNBPGNBP01100020.420516
IAPIAP11030270.260929
IMDPATHIKKg10010020.668311
LYSLYSC12221371915422560
MLML14105893490.223609
PGRPPGRP914225230.312906
PPOPPO11010030.653363
PRDXGPX821103150.100553
PRDXHPX12131080.446023
PRDXTPX7351448410.136651
SCRSCRA073122150.004735
SCRSCRB10012040.26927
SCRSCRC10000010.754901
SODSOD-Cu-Zn533722220.798952
SODSOD-Mn-Fe3054246510.000052
SPZSPZ00100010.575875
SRPNSRPN-INHIB2688284560.001248
SRPNSRPN-nonINHIB422032130.281764
TEPTEP112114100.376665
TOLLPATHTUBE00000110.562898
Totals9652753692471762632295

Peptide sequences were harvested from ImmunoDB [24] for An. gambiae, Ae. aegypti, and D. melanogaster for each of the following gene families: All 8,020 EST clusters were blasted against a database of these peptides using blastx (e-value cutoff of 1e-5). BLAST hits were parsed from output files using tcl_blast_parser_123_V017.tcl [55] with a cut-off of 40% match, 1e-20 normalized e-value, and a minimum match length of 30 residues. Top hits were taken for each significant match and verified manually. Matches then were categorized by family and subfamily according to Waterhouse et al. (2007) (Left column) and the composition (# of compiled sequences) of EST clusters were collated from the assembly according to the library(s) from which ESTs came: asuhem (bacteria-inoculated, hemocyte), diroinf (whole body, Dirofilaria immitis injected), imacbac (bacteria-inoculated whole body), brumal (blood-fed Brugia malayi), n7 and n14 (naïve, 5–7 and 12–14 days of age). Stekel R values [23] were determined for the groupings using IDEG6 [20] and those having a score of 0.001 or better were considered significantly differential, and are flagged with bolded and underlined text for the row.

Armigeres subalbatus EST clusters that represent characterized, published sequences from this mosquito. Because of the unique, robust melanization response that is elicited when Ar. subalbatus is infected with certain nematode parasites, several molecules related to melanogenesis have been the subject of comprehensive characterization. EST clusters encoding these gene products are presented according to the number of ESTs in the following libraries: asuhem (bacteria-inoculated, hemocyte), diroinf (whole body, Dirofilaria immitis injected), imacbac (bacteria-inoculated whole body), brumal (blood-fed Brugia malayi), n7 and n14 (naïve, 7 and 14 days of age). Searching Ar. subalbatus EST clusters for immunity-related sequences based on homology to other flies. Peptide sequences were harvested from ImmunoDB [24] for An. gambiae, Ae. aegypti, and D. melanogaster for each of the following gene families: All 8,020 EST clusters were blasted against a database of these peptides using blastx (e-value cutoff of 1e-5). BLAST hits were parsed from output files using tcl_blast_parser_123_V017.tcl [55] with a cut-off of 40% match, 1e-20 normalized e-value, and a minimum match length of 30 residues. Top hits were taken for each significant match and verified manually. Matches then were categorized by family and subfamily according to Waterhouse et al. (2007) (Left column) and the composition (# of compiled sequences) of EST clusters were collated from the assembly according to the library(s) from which ESTs came: asuhem (bacteria-inoculated, hemocyte), diroinf (whole body, Dirofilaria immitis injected), imacbac (bacteria-inoculated whole body), brumal (blood-fed Brugia malayi), n7 and n14 (naïve, 5–7 and 12–14 days of age). Stekel R values [23] were determined for the groupings using IDEG6 [20] and those having a score of 0.001 or better were considered significantly differential, and are flagged with bolded and underlined text for the row. This analysis underscores the degree to which immunity related ESTs are enriched in libraries from bacteria-inoculated mosquitoes. Particularly from the hemocyte library, ESTs from all subcategories are represented in abundance (Table 4). We expected to see some evidence of increased abundance of ESTs related to melanization, because published reports on the melanization response indicate that phenoloxidase is up-regulated as a result of immune-response activation [5]. However, few ESTs representing the biochemical pathway of melanogenesis were evident amongst the clusters (see Table 3). This limited representation could be a result of cloning bias inherent in library production, or introduced due to inoculation methodology, or even wound healing. Or, up-regulation may not be necessary to affect the response that we know to be occurring in the mosquito at the time points chosen for library construction [19].

Comparisons with Ae. aegypti, An. gambiae, and D. melanogaster

The family Culicidae contains approximately 2,500 species of mosquitoes, of which only a handful are capable of vectoring disease. Much of the current effort to understand the molecular components of vector competence has focused on An. gambiae and Ae. aegypti [25,26], because these species transmit disease agents that have a tremendous impact on global public health (malaria, and dengue fever and yellow fever viruses, respectively). Comparative genomics analysis between these mosquitoes and the ongoing genome project on Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus, as compared to the fruit fly, have provided and will provide resources to bolster studies to systematically investigate common and mosquito species-specific gene function [25-28]. This includes gaining new insight into the molecular basis of insecticide resistance, host-seeking behaviour, blood feeding, and vector-parasite interactions that are unique to blood-feeding (hematophagous) vectors. The last of these is perhaps the most dramatic separation between the mosquitoes and fruit flies – hematophagy is intimately tied to a variety of physiologies including oogenesis and immunity, and therefore imposes unique demands on mosquitoes as compared to Drosophila. In a microarray analysis of An. gambiae, 25% of the genes on the array changed transcript levels in response to blood-feeding [29]. Among the Diptera, there is an evolutionary divergence of approximately 250 million years separating mosquitoes from D. melanogaster. The mosquitoes An. gambiae and Ae. aegypti are separated by 150 million years [26]. An. gambiae is a member of the subfamily Anophelinae, which contains the primary vectors of human malaria. In contrast, Ae. aegypti is a member of the subfamily Culicinae, which contains the majority of mosquito species that are of medical or veterinary importance, e.g., Aedes, Culex, Armigeres, and Mansonia. These two mosquito subfamilies differ significantly in genomic structure [30-32], and in vector competence. Broadly, Anopheles species are most often incriminated as vectors of parasitic disease agents (e.g., malaria and filarial worm parasites), and Aedes and Culex species are critically important in the transmission of arthropod-borne viruses as well as filarial worms. Ar. subalbatus is a competent vector of viruses and parasites, and is more closely related to Ae. aegypti than to An gambiae; Ae. aegypti and Ar. subalbatus are phylogenetically linked at the level of tribe (Culicini). Therefore, comparisons between these two species of mosquito may provide unique insights into vector competence and innate immunity. Based on the evolutionary distance, vector status, and vector competence of the fly species for which we have genome data, we asked: of the 8,020 EST clusters or singletons, how many have homologs in the available databases for 4 fly genomes/transcriptomes? The output from blastx analysis of predicted peptide sequences was filtered to search for homologous sequences using an e-value cutoff of 1e-20, a percent match of 40% (true matches, not conserved), and a minimum match length of 30 for the high-scoring segment pair. A large number of clusters (3,013 (38%)) did not have a homolog in any database as defined by this screen. Those clusters that were homologous were subjected to Venn analysis (Figure 3A) to discover overlapping predicted peptides in 3 other mosquito species: Ae. aegypti, (Ae Vectorbase AaegL1.1), An. gambiae (Anoph Vectorbase AgamP3), and C.p. quinquefasciatus (Cpip Vectorbase CpipJ1.0_5), and the fruit fly, D. melanogaster. The mosquito with the largest number of gene products that are uniquely homologous to Ar. subalbatus is Ae. aegypti, as would be predicted by the degree of relatedness of these two mosquitoes. In comparing Ar. subalbatus to all available mosquito and Drosophila homologous predicted peptides, 2908 sequences are represented in all fly species. A significant number (2,074) of clusters from Ar. subalbatus qualify as homologs to genes in other mosquito species, but have no homolog in the fruit fly (Figure 3B).
Figure 3

Homologous sequences for . A) Comparative analysis of Ar. subalbatus EST clusters with predicted peptides from 3 other mosquito species with completed genomes: Ae. aegypti, An. gambiae, and C.p. quinquefasciatus. Overlapping regions indicate homologous sequences from blastx searches against the peptide databases. A homolog is defined as having an e-value cutoff of 1e-20, a percent match of 40% (true matches, not conserved), and a minimum match length of 30 for the high-scoring segment pair (HSP). This comparison includes 8,020 possible cluster sequences from Ar. subalbatus (brackets), of which 3,013 had no homolog. Boxes directly adjacent to circles indicate 1) the species being compared to Ar. subalbatus, and 2) the total # of homologous sequences between that species and Ar. subalbatus. B) A gene list of the total of overlapping and non-overlapping Ar. subalbatus homologs to Ae. aegypti, An. gambiae, and C. p. quinquefasciatus was compared to a gene list of homologs found to D. melanogaster. A significant number of genes (2,074) from Ar. subalbatus have no homolog in the fruit fly, but qualify as homologs to genes in other mosquito species.

Homologous sequences for . A) Comparative analysis of Ar. subalbatus EST clusters with predicted peptides from 3 other mosquito species with completed genomes: Ae. aegypti, An. gambiae, and C.p. quinquefasciatus. Overlapping regions indicate homologous sequences from blastx searches against the peptide databases. A homolog is defined as having an e-value cutoff of 1e-20, a percent match of 40% (true matches, not conserved), and a minimum match length of 30 for the high-scoring segment pair (HSP). This comparison includes 8,020 possible cluster sequences from Ar. subalbatus (brackets), of which 3,013 had no homolog. Boxes directly adjacent to circles indicate 1) the species being compared to Ar. subalbatus, and 2) the total # of homologous sequences between that species and Ar. subalbatus. B) A gene list of the total of overlapping and non-overlapping Ar. subalbatus homologs to Ae. aegypti, An. gambiae, and C. p. quinquefasciatus was compared to a gene list of homologs found to D. melanogaster. A significant number of genes (2,074) from Ar. subalbatus have no homolog in the fruit fly, but qualify as homologs to genes in other mosquito species. Taking this one step further, from quantity of hits to quality of hits, we looked at the frequency distribution of e-value hits for the homologous sequences (Figure 4). There is an obvious shift toward more significant e-values for homologs in Ae. aegypti, a shift away from more significant e-values for homologs in Drosophila and Anopheles, and homologs in Cx. pipiens display an intermediate shift, closer to that seen in Ae. aegypti.
Figure 4

Frequency distribution of the quality of blastx matches (according to e-value) for genes considered to be homologs in . The number of e-values within a range is presented as a percentage of the total number of homologs per species. The graph shows an increasing trend of higher quality matches in more closely related species, while a majority of matches in distant species are lower quality.

Frequency distribution of the quality of blastx matches (according to e-value) for genes considered to be homologs in . The number of e-values within a range is presented as a percentage of the total number of homologs per species. The graph shows an increasing trend of higher quality matches in more closely related species, while a majority of matches in distant species are lower quality.

Conclusion

Following recognition of any pathogen in a mosquito, a cascade of innate immune responses ensues that can include humoral responses (e.g. production of antimicrobial peptides), cellular (e.g. phagocytosis) and cell-mediated events (e.g. melanotic encapsulation). Because immunity-related genes function in concert to clear a pathogen [33,34], it is informative to use a holistic approach when evaluating expression and/or regulation i.e. it is likely that most of these genes are not activated independent of other immune-response genes. For example, in Ar. subalbatus, the biochemical pathway required for melanin biosynthesis is well characterized, but there is much to learn about the anti-filarial worm response as a whole in this mosquito species. What is readily apparent from the limited number of functional genomics studies that have investigated insect immunity, is that we really do not know very much about the mechanisms required to successfully eliminate an invading pathogen from a refractory mosquito (Aliota et al. [19]), and the subsequent changes necessary for a successful return to homeostasis. There are a large number of unknown genes found in this and many other EST and microarray projects. We hypothesize that a large proportion of these unknowns are functionally linked to the unique and specific immune response of Ar. subalbatus, because of the material used to construct the libraries from which ESTs were produced. The rapidly expanding bank of large EST datasets and whole genome sequences for mosquitoes [1,26,28,35-39] provide the capability to critically evaluate the unknowns in the context of the many characterized facets of innate immunity, simultaneously. A microarray platform based on this Ar. subalbatus EST dataset has been designed for this purpose, and was screened with material from immune-response activated mosquitoes (Aliota et al. [19]). For comparative purposes at the species level, this large dataset provides an important addition to the available sequence databases. Dipterans exhibit extraordinary variation in morphology, behaviour and physiology, so these ESTs add to the ongoing and increasingly powerful comparisons of fly species [29,40-42]. By virtue of hematophagy, mosquitoes are presented with unique physiologic challenges as compared to fruit files; at a minimum, blood-feeding requires host-seeking, triggers oogenesis, and exposes mosquitoes to a variety of blood-borne pathogens. Some of these challenges are shared with other vectors of disease agents. Vector-borne diseases such as malaria, leishmaniasis, African and American trypanosomiasis, Lyme disease and epidemic typhus, are caused by disease agents that are transmitted by mosquitoes, sandflies, tsetse, kissing bugs, ticks and body lice, respectively. There is a great deal of promise for enhancing our understanding of vector biology through genome sequencing and functional genomics analysis that will be increasingly available for a number of these species [43].

Methods

Mosquito maintenance

Ar. subalbatus was obtained from the University of Notre Dame in 1986. Larvae were hatched in distilled water and fed a ground slurry of Tetramin® fish food. Pupae were separated by sex, and females transferred in lots of 80 to cartons. Adult females were fed on 0.3 M sucrose-soaked cotton balls. All mosquitoes were maintained at 26.5° ± 1°C, 75% ± 10% relative humidity with a 16 hr/8 hr light/dark cycle beginning and ending with a 90 min crepuscular period [1].

Immune response activation and tissue collection

To construct libraries from immune response activated mosquitoes, 2–3 day old adult female Ar. subalbatus either were inoculated or infected with the pathogen or parasite known to elicit the response of interest. Bacteria inoculation. A mixture of E. coli K12 and M. luteus was used as an inoculum as previously described [44]. Cold-immobilized mosquitoes were held in place with a vacuum saddle, and a 0.15 mm stainless steel probe was dipped into a bacterial pellet and inserted into the cervical membrane. Mosquitoes were returned to the insectary for 24, 48, or 72 h prior to harvesting. Dirofilaria immitis inoculation. Cold-immobilized mosquitoes were secured in a vacuum saddle as previously described [45] and injected in the cervical membrane with approximately 20 D. immitis microfilarae (mf) in physiologic saline [46], and returned to the insectary for 24 or 48 hours prior to harvesting. Brugia malayi infection. Sucrose was removed from the cartons 14–16 h prior to presenting mosquitoes to gerbils infected with B. malayi (microfilaraemia of approximately 44 mf/20 ml) for a blood meal. Gerbils were anesthetized with a ketamine/xylazine mixture. Microfilaremia was measured using 20 ul of blood collected by retro-orbital bleeding; formalin was added to lyse red blood cells and microfilariae were counted using phase microscopy as done previously [47]. Replete females were returned to the insectary for 24, 48, or 72 hours prior to harvesting. Naïve blood fed mosquitoes: Sucrose was removed from the cartons 14–16 h prior to presenting mosquitoes to uninfected gerbils for a blood meal. Gerbils were anesthetized as described previously. Replete females were returned to the insectary for 24, 48, or 72 hours prior to harvesting. The library developed from this source did not produce quality sequences, so sequence data are unavailable. Naïve mosquitoes. Females were randomly collected by aspiration from cartons of undisturbed, non-infected naïve adult females at 5–7 and 14–21 days post-eclosion.

Tissue collection

RNA was isolated from 5–10 whole bodies for the following libraries: E. coli and M. luteus inoculated, D. immitis inoculated, B. malayi infected, naïve 7-day, naïve 14-day, and naïve bloodfed. For whole body collection, infected or inoculated female mosquitoes were collected at the aforementioned time points, frozen on dry ice, and stored at -80°C until ready for extraction. Frozen bodies were homogenized in a 1.5 ml tube using a Kontes® tissue grinder in the presence of guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform solution [48]. For hemocyte-derived bacteria inoculated libraries, a volume displacement method was used, as previously described [1]. One drop of perfusate was collected from each mosquito, kept on dry ice, and stored at -80°C until ready for extraction.

Library construction

RNA was extracted from mosquito whole bodies or hemocytes by single-step guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction [48]. RNA was visualized on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels to confirm quality, and then material from all time points were pooled. Complimentary DNA libraries were constructed using the SMART cDNA Library Construction kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). Purified RNA was poly(A) selected for the long range PCR templates for whole body libraries, while total RNA was used for the hemocyte libraries.

Sequence collection

For all libraries, sequence data were collected as previously described [1]. Briefly, plaques were blue/white screened, isolated by robotic picker, and used directly as a template in PCR reactions at the University of Wisconsin. At Yang-Ming the library was subjected to a mass excision protocol to produce plasmid templates for sequencing, as described in the manufacturer's protocol. The number of ESTs produced from either method is described in Table 1.

EST clustering

A total of 44,940 trace files from both the UW and Yang-Ming collections were base-called and vector-trimmed using phred version 0.020425.c [49,50]. A "trim_cutoff" value of 0.025 was used to remove poor quality bases from the ends of reads, and SCF3 trace files were output for downstream clustering. Verified duplicate files from replicate sequencing were removed from the pool to reduce perceived cluster depth and improve data analysis. Poly-A tails and any remaining vector sequences were then removed with TIGR's seqclean [51], traces identified as contaminants from E. coli or any of the pathogens used for stimulus were removed, and finally, all traces with less than 51 bases of quality sequence were discarded, resulting in 38,079 traces proceeding into the assembler. Quality trace data were clustered using LaserGene Seqman, Genome Edition (DNASTAR, Inc.) [52] on a WindowsXP workstation. A rapid, high stringency clustering was performed first, using the "Fast Assembler" module, with the following parameters: minimum match 90%, match size 25, match spacing 150, gap penalty 0, gap length penalty 0.7, end position mismatch 0, and minimum sequence length 50. These parameters are very conservative within the context of this program (i.e. minimizes false joins), so further automated merging with the "Classic Assembler" module was performed at a match size of 12, and a minimum match percentage of 90%. All other parameters were set to default. This had the effect of merging clusters that were very closely related with minimal gap sizes.

Similarity searches

To predict gene products and assign gene ontology classifications, EST clusters were compared to sequences from the GenPept database (Genbank version 156) and gene products from the whole genome annotations of D. melanogaster (Flybase version 5.1), An. gambiae (ENSEMBL genebuild 41), and Ae. aeygpti (Vectorbase version L1.1). A FASTA-formatted file was collected from the assembly software, and subjected to BLASTX searches using the aforementioned databases. An E-value cut-off of 10-3 was used to reduce non-informative hits, and filtering was not used. Search results were uploaded to A Systematic Annotation Package for Community Analysis of Genomes (ASAP) annotation workbench for manual annotation [53].

Sequence annotation

The annotations of EST clusters in ASAP were conducted in a similar fashion as outlined previously [1], excluding protein domain searches due to the large data set size. Homolog information was collected for both An. gambiae (Ensembl) and Ae. aeygpti (Vectorbase), with links provided to those databases. Special attention was paid to Gene Ontology descriptors on the matches to D. melanogaster in Flybase. Where an annotation to Flybase was of "putative" or better, Gene Ontology information was transferred onto the cluster annotation.

Data sharing

All data for this project are publicly accessible in ASAP via the web as annotated collapsed EST clusters [54]. Individual ESTs have been deposited with the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) dbEST: database of Expressed Sequence Tags, under the following accession number range: EU204979 – EU212998.

Authors' contributions

GFM and LCB annotated sequences, analyzed data and prepared the text and figures. HYK analyzed sequence data. TAR constructed libraries and annotated sequence data. LCB and JFF prepared materials for library construction and annotated sequence data. GFM developed sequencing techniques and supervised sequencing efforts at UW-Madison. MTA contributed to manuscript preparation. IYT and CYH excised libraries for plasmid sequencing. TTL, KJH, SFT, and UCY conceived of and optimized parameters for plasmid sequencing. NTP facilitated the use of ASAP to annotate sequence data. WLC, BMC, and CCC conceived these studies and supervised all aspects of data collection and analysis.

Additional file 1

Cluster analysis using six different statistical methods to determine differential copy numbers of ESTs broken down by library. Clusters and their constituent ESTs were analysed using IDEG6 [20] to find clusters where the number of ESTs were statistically different between the libraries. Each row represents the Genbank Accession number for cluster, which is linked to the corresponding record at NCBI for ease of access, and the columns are the number of ESTs from each of the six libraries that are a member of it. The libraries are: asuhem (bacteria-inoculated, hemocyte), diroinf (whole body, Dirofilaria immitis injected), imacbac (bacteria-inoculated whole body), brumal (blood-fed Brugia malayi), n7 and n14 (naïve, 5–7 and 12–14 days of age). Columns with (norm) in the header are the number of ESTs in that library normalized by the number of ESTs total in that library and the number of ESTs total. The "bluer" the shading, the more "up" the relative abundance of ESTs are compared the the rest of the libraries in that row. "AC" columns are Audic and Claverie 2 × 2 comparisons [21]; "Fisher" columns are Fishers Exact Test 2 × 2 comparisons; "Chi2 × 2" columns are Chi Square 2 × 2 comparison, and "GT" is Geller and Tobin scores [22]. The R value is the inverse log of the Stekel R Score [23], and the Chi value is a general Chi square analysis. Yellow shaded cells are filtered in the 95% or higher significance range. The other tab, "Flagged Differential" contains the same data as in Table 4, but include the "AC", "Fishers", "Chi2 × 2", and "GT" columns, and the Genbank accession numbers are linked to NCBI. The yellow cell shading in the product column indicates clusters that are considered differential in Brugia malayi blood-fed females in Aliota, et. al. [19] Click here for file
  50 in total

1.  Anopheles gambiae pilot gene discovery project: identification of mosquito innate immunity genes from expressed sequence tags generated from immune-competent cell lines.

Authors:  G Dimopoulos; T L Casavant; S Chang; T Scheetz; C Roberts; M Donohue; J Schultz; V Benes; P Bork; W Ansorge; M B Soares; F C Kafatos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  DNASTAR's Lasergene sequence analysis software.

Authors:  T G Burland
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

3.  A genome-wide analysis of immune responses in Drosophila.

Authors:  P Irving; L Troxler; T S Heuer; M Belvin; C Kopczynski; J M Reichhart; J A Hoffmann; C Hetru
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Innate immune response of Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  C Lowenberger
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 4.714

Review 5.  Innate immune defense against malaria infection in the mosquito.

Authors:  G Dimopoulos; H M Müller; E A Levashina; F C Kafatos
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.486

6.  The comparison of gene expression from multiple cDNA libraries.

Authors:  D J Stekel; Y Git; F Falciani
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Cellular-mediated reactions to foreign organisms inoculated into the hemocoel of Anopheles albimanus (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Salvador Hernández-Martínez; Humberto Lanz; Mario H Rodríguez; Lilia González-Ceron; Victor Tsutsumi
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.278

8.  The genome sequence of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Robert A Holt; G Mani Subramanian; Aaron Halpern; Granger G Sutton; Rosane Charlab; Deborah R Nusskern; Patrick Wincker; Andrew G Clark; José M C Ribeiro; Ron Wides; Steven L Salzberg; Brendan Loftus; Mark Yandell; William H Majoros; Douglas B Rusch; Zhongwu Lai; Cheryl L Kraft; Josep F Abril; Veronique Anthouard; Peter Arensburger; Peter W Atkinson; Holly Baden; Veronique de Berardinis; Danita Baldwin; Vladimir Benes; Jim Biedler; Claudia Blass; Randall Bolanos; Didier Boscus; Mary Barnstead; Shuang Cai; Angela Center; Kabir Chaturverdi; George K Christophides; Mathew A Chrystal; Michele Clamp; Anibal Cravchik; Val Curwen; Ali Dana; Art Delcher; Ian Dew; Cheryl A Evans; Michael Flanigan; Anne Grundschober-Freimoser; Lisa Friedli; Zhiping Gu; Ping Guan; Roderic Guigo; Maureen E Hillenmeyer; Susanne L Hladun; James R Hogan; Young S Hong; Jeffrey Hoover; Olivier Jaillon; Zhaoxi Ke; Chinnappa Kodira; Elena Kokoza; Anastasios Koutsos; Ivica Letunic; Alex Levitsky; Yong Liang; Jhy-Jhu Lin; Neil F Lobo; John R Lopez; Joel A Malek; Tina C McIntosh; Stephan Meister; Jason Miller; Clark Mobarry; Emmanuel Mongin; Sean D Murphy; David A O'Brochta; Cynthia Pfannkoch; Rong Qi; Megan A Regier; Karin Remington; Hongguang Shao; Maria V Sharakhova; Cynthia D Sitter; Jyoti Shetty; Thomas J Smith; Renee Strong; Jingtao Sun; Dana Thomasova; Lucas Q Ton; Pantelis Topalis; Zhijian Tu; Maria F Unger; Brian Walenz; Aihui Wang; Jian Wang; Mei Wang; Xuelan Wang; Kerry J Woodford; Jennifer R Wortman; Martin Wu; Alison Yao; Evgeny M Zdobnov; Hongyu Zhang; Qi Zhao; Shaying Zhao; Shiaoping C Zhu; Igor Zhimulev; Mario Coluzzi; Alessandra della Torre; Charles W Roth; Christos Louis; Francis Kalush; Richard J Mural; Eugene W Myers; Mark D Adams; Hamilton O Smith; Samuel Broder; Malcolm J Gardner; Claire M Fraser; Ewan Birney; Peer Bork; Paul T Brey; J Craig Venter; Jean Weissenbach; Fotis C Kafatos; Frank H Collins; Stephen L Hoffman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The Anopheles genome and comparative insect genomics.

Authors:  Thomas C Kaufman; David W Severson; Gene E Robinson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Toward a description of the sialome of the adult female mosquito Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  J G Valenzuela; V M Pham; M K Garfield; I M B Francischetti; J M C Ribeiro
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.714

View more
  4 in total

1.  Mosquito transcriptome profiles and filarial worm susceptibility in Armigeres subalbatus.

Authors:  Matthew T Aliota; Jeremy F Fuchs; Thomas A Rocheleau; Amanda K Clark; Julián F Hillyer; Cheng-Chen Chen; Bruce M Christensen
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-04-20

2.  Functions of Armigeres subalbatus C-type lectins in innate immunity.

Authors:  Xiu-Zhen Shi; Cui-Jie Kang; Song-Jie Wang; Xue Zhong; Brenda T Beerntsen; Xiao-Qiang Yu
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.714

Review 3.  Transcriptomic Insights into the Insect Immune Response to Nematode Infection.

Authors:  Ioannis Eleftherianos; Christa Heryanto
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Mosquito transcriptome changes and filarial worm resistance in Armigeres subalbatus.

Authors:  Matthew T Aliota; Jeremy F Fuchs; George F Mayhew; Cheng-Chen Chen; Bruce M Christensen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 3.969

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.